Skip to main content
Log in

Research Governance and Change in Research Ethics Practices at a Major Australian University

  • Articles
  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent revisions of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research put a great emphasis on research governance. Institutional responsibility for the governance of the research is not limited only to the ethical review by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), but also to the accountability for quality, safety, privacy, risk management and financial management of the research. Despite the development of proposed research governance frameworks, many Australian institutions do not have such structures in place and rely excessively on HRECs to perform administrative functions that are not their responsibility. In this paper we report on implementation of a research governance framework at University of New South Wales which led to reduced HREC workload and allowed more attention to its core functions. We present the approach undertaken by the university to separate the ethical review process by HREC from the research governance. We recommend that with proper research governance frameworks in place, the role of HRECs and the institutional responsibility of governance of the research can be defined clearly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, G. 2007. Mind the gap: Griffith University’s approach to the governance of ethical conduct in human research. Monash Bioethics Review 26(1–2): 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W; Cordner, C; Breen, K. 2006. Strengthening Australia’s framework for research oversight. Medical Journal of Australia 184(6): 261–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babl, F. E; Sharwood, L. N. 2008. Research governance: current knowledge among clinical researchers. Medical Journal of Australia 188(11) (June): 649–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, G. S; Frew, D. 2008. Regulation of research through research governance: within and beyond NSW Health. NSW Public Health Bulletin 19(11–12): 199–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. 2002. The expectation gap, risk management and the Australian HREC system. Monash Bioethics Review 21(3): 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frew, D; Martlew, A. 2007. A. Research governance: new hope for ethics committees? Monash Bioethics Review 26(1–2): 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, S.C; James, R.E; Wong, N; Tebbutt, N.C; Wilson, K. 2009. A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials. Medical Journal of Australia 191(5): 280–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loblay, R. 2008. Human research ethics — a work in progress. Medical Journal of Australia 188(11) (June): 628–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC. 2008. Harmonisation of Multi-centre Ethical Review (HoMER). Canberra: Australian Government. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health_ethics/homer/index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC. 2010a. Overview of Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs). Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health_ethics/hrecs/overview.htm [viewed 28 February 2011]

    Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC. 2010b. Understanding Research Governance of Multi-centre Human Research Discussion Paper. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/health_ethics/homer/homer_consult.htm.

  • NHMRC; ARC; AVCC. 2007a. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHMRC; ARC; Universities Australia. 2007b. Australian code for the responsible conduct of research:.Revision of the joint NHMRC/AVCC statement and guidelines on research practice. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poustie, S; Taylor, D; Forbes, A; Skiba, M; Nelson, M; McNeil, J. 2006. Implementing a research governance framework for clinical and public health research. Medical Journal of Australia 185(11–12): 623–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSW. 2010. Operations Manual for the Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs). Available from: http://www.gmo.unsw.edu.au/Ethics/HumanEthics/InformationForApplicants/ProformasTemplates/HREC_Operations_Manual_v2.9_final.pdf.

  • Walsh, M. K; McNeil, J. J; Breen, K. J. 2005. Improving governance of health research. Medical Journal of Australia. 182(9) (May): 468–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krastev, Y., Grimm, M. & Metcalfe, A. Research Governance and Change in Research Ethics Practices at a Major Australian University. Monash Bioethics Review 29, 49–55 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351330

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03351330

Keywords

Navigation