Abstract
While the struggle for life played an important role in the process of natural selection as it was conceived by Darwin, natural selection is commonly characterized today as a process which does not necessarily involve struggle. Nevertheless, there have been some attempts to show the importance of struggle to the process of natural selection. The present paper aims to continue these attempts and clarify the precise evolutionary role of struggle. The paper focuses on a recent dispute regarding the role of struggle between Peter Godfrey-Smith and Tim Lewens. Godfrey-Smith argues that struggle makes populations into "paradigm cases of Darwinian populations", meaning that struggle leads natural selection to produce adaptations. Lewens, in contrast, argues that Godfrey-Smith's argument fails to show that struggle plays such a role. I argue that Godfrey-Smith's argument that struggle leads selection to produce adaptations can be understood in two different ways. Lewens interprets Godfrey-Smith's argument in one of these ways, and rightly argues that thus understood, this argument fails to show that struggle leads selection to produce adaptations. However, I show that understood in a second way, Godfrey-Smith's argument does show that struggle plays such a role. Still, I show that there is an additional problem with Godfrey-Smith's argument that struggle makes populations into "paradigm cases of Darwinian populations". It does not capture the precise role played by struggle in the relation between selection and adaptation. Thus, the present paper clarifies the unique role that struggle plays in the relation between selection and adaptation in evolutionary theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In Godfrey-Smith’s terminology, while it is clear how selection plays a role in "distribution" explanations, it is less clear how selection also plays a role in "origin" explanations (Godfrey-Smith 2009, pp. 42–43).
This problem was also recognized in an earlier work by Lewens (2004, pp. 31–32). In recent works, Lewens argues that even in such problematic cases where selection for a variant decreases the absolute numbers of this variant, there is still a sense in which selection also increases the absolute numbers of the variant which is selected (see Lewens 2015, p. 593; 2017, p. 16).
I thank an anonymous referee for pointing me to this possible objection.
Note, however, that while the inheritance system must be reliable, it cannot be too reliable. If inheritance is perfectly accurate such that no new variations can be introduced to the population, this means that sooner or later selection will run out of variations to sort through, and would not be able to produce anything new (Godfrey-Smith 2009, p. 47).
I ignore here the possibility of change due to random drift, for simplicity.
References
Ayala FJ (1970) Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. Philos Sci 37(1):1–15
Beatty J (2016) The creativity of natural selection? Part I: Darwin, Darwinism, and the mutationists. J Hist Biol 49(4):659–684
Darwin CR (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray, London
Dawkins R (1986) The blind watchmaker: why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. Norton, New York
Godfrey-Smith P (2009) Darwinian populations and natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Godfrey-Smith P (2014) Philosophy of biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Huxley J (1942) Evolution: the modern synthesis. Allen & Unwin, London
Lennox JG, Wilson BE (1994) Natural selection and the struggle for existence. Stud Hist Philos Sci A 25(1):65–80
Lewens T (2004) Organisms and artifacts: design in nature and elsewhere. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Lewens T (2010) Natural selection then and now. Biol Rev 85(4):829–835
Lewens T (2015) The nature of philosophy and the philosophy of nature. Biol Philos 30(4):587–596
Lewens T (2017) The nature of selection: an overview. In: Joyce R (ed) The Routledge handbook of evolution and philosophy. Routledge, New York, pp 3–18
Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1(1):1–18
Lewontin RC (1978) Adaptation. Sci Am 239(3):213–229
Lewontin RC (1985) Adaptation. In: Levins R, Lewontin RC (eds) The dialectical biologist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 65–84
Neander K (1995) Pruning the tree of life. Br J Philos Sci 46(1):59–80
Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ruse M (1971) Natural selection in The Origin of Species. Stud Hist Philos Sci A 1(4):311–351
Smith JM, Szathmary E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sterelny K (2001) Niche construction, developmental systems, and the extended replicator. In: Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 333–350
Sterelny K (2011) Evolvability reconsidered. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) The major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 83–100
Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and death: an introduction to philosophy of biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Wagner GP, Altenberg L (1996) Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967–976
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Ehud Lamm for his helpful comments on this paper. This paper is based on a chapter from my PhD thesis.
Funding
This work was kindly supported by The Interuniversitry Ph.D. Program in the History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, supported by the Humanities Fund of the Israeli Council of Higher Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krashniak, A. The struggle for life and adaptation by natural selection. Biol Philos 36, 28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09803-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-021-09803-4