Europe PMC

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


The ever-growing acceptance and use of assisted human reproduction techniques has caused demand for "donated" sperm and eggs to outstrip supply. Medical professionals and others argue that monetary reward is the only way to recruit sufficient numbers of "donors". Is this a clash between pragmatics and policy/ethics? Where monetary payments are the norm, alternative recruitment strategies used successfully elsewhere may not have been considered, nor the negative consequences of commercialism on all participants thought through. Considerations leading some countries to ban the buying and selling of sperm, eggs and embryos are outlined and a case made that the collective welfare of all involved parties be the primary consideration in this, at times heated, debate.

Free full text 


Logo of jmedethLink to Publisher's site
J Med Ethics. 2000 Jun; 26(3): 206–211.
PMCID: PMC1733228
PMID: 10860215

To give or sell human gametes - the interplay between pragmatics, policy and ethics

Abstract

The ever-growing acceptance and use of assisted human reproduction techniques has caused demand for "donated" sperm and eggs to outstrip supply. Medical professionals and others argue that monetary reward is the only way to recruit sufficient numbers of "donors". Is this a clash between pragmatics and policy/ethics? Where monetary payments are the norm, alternative recruitment strategies used successfully elsewhere may not have been considered, nor the negative consequences of commercialism on all participants thought through. Considerations leading some countries to ban the buying and selling of sperm, eggs and embryos are outlined and a case made that the collective welfare of all involved parties be the primary consideration in this, at times heated, debate.

Key Words: Gametes • gifting • selling • ethics • policy

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (104K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • GREGOIRE AT, MAYER RC. THE IMPREGNATORS. (WILLIAM PANCOAST), (ADDISON DAVIS HARD). Fertil Steril. 1965 Jan-Feb;16:130–134. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels KR, Lewis GM. Donor insemination: the gifting and selling of semen. Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jun;42(11):1521–1536. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels KR. Information sharing in donor insemination: a conflict of rights and needs. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Spring;4(2):217–224. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels Ken R, Taylor Karyn. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics Life Sci. 1993 Aug;12(2):155–170. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels KR, Lewis GM, Curson R. Information sharing in semen donation: the views of donors. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):673–680. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lui SC, Weaver SM. Attitudes and motives of semen donors and non-donors. Hum Reprod. 1996 Sep;11(9):2061–2066. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Craft I, Johnson MH, Sauer MV. Should egg donors be paid? BMJ. 1997 May 10;314(7091):1400–1403. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Gazvani MR, Wood SJ, Thomson AJ, Kingsland CR, Lewis-Jones DI. Payment or altruism? The motivation behind gamete donation. Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):1845–1846. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyall H, Gould GW, Cameron IT. Should sperm donors be paid? A survey of the attitudes of the general public. Hum Reprod. 1998 Mar;13(3):771–775. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Walters LeRoy. Current and future issues in assisted reproduction. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1996 Dec;6(4):383–387. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Baird PA. Ethical issues of fertility and reproduction. Annu Rev Med. 1996;47:107–116. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson M. Payments to gamete donors: position of the human fertilisation and embryology authority. Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):1839–1842. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels KR, Hall DJ. Semen donor recruitment strategies--a non-payment based approach. Hum Reprod. 1997 Oct;12(10):2330–2335. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson JA. Ethical and legal issues in human egg donation. Fertil Steril. 1989 Sep;52(3):353–363. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Shenfield F, Steele SJ. A gift is a gift is a gift, or why gamete donors should not be paid. Hum Reprod. 1995 Feb;10(2):253–255. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Daniels KR, Gunby J, Legge M, Williams TH, Wynn-Williams DB. Issues and problems for the infertile couple. N Z Med J. 1984 Mar 28;97(752):185–187. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Purdie A, Peek JC, Adair V, Graham F, Fisher R. Attitudes of parents of young children to sperm donation--implications for donor recruitment. Hum Reprod. 1994 Jul;9(7):1355–1358. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Novaes SB. Giving, receiving, repaying. Gamete donors and donor policies in reproductive medicine. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1989;5(4):639–657. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1136/jme.26.3.206

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
22
1

Article citations


Go to all (15) article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.