Skip to main content
Log in

Background Independence in Quantum Gravity and Forcing Constructions

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general duality connecting the level of a formal theory and of a metatheory is proposed. Because of the role of natural numbers in a metatheory the existence of a dual theory is conjectured, in which the natural numbers become formal in the theory but in formalizing non-formal natural numbers taken from the dual metatheory these numbers become nonstandard. For any formal theory there may be in principle a dual theory. The dual shape of the lattice of projections over separable Hilbert space is exhibited. The crucial ingredient of this dual theory is set-theoretical (Cohen) forcing. Then, some attempts have been made to exhibit the dual shape of the exotic smooth (small) structures on topological ℝ4. There are striking similarities of both pictures. Nonstandard solutions of the equations of motion of 10-dimensional superstring of IIB type are described as a model theoretic extension of standard ones. Based on Brans conjecture one can predict the existence of sources of gravity in 4 dimensions. By their dual origins they carry quantum information as well. The generalized Maldacena conjecture appears naturally, which sheds light on a definition of background independent string theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Ashtekar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2244(1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Smolin, "The cubic matrix model and duality between strings and loops," hep-th/ 0006137 (2000).

  3. A. Ashtekar, "Quantum geometry and gravity: recent advances," gr-qc/0112038.

  4. P. Benioff, "Language is physical," quant-ph/0210211 (2002).

  5. C. Isham, "Some reflections on the status of conventional quantum theory when applied to quantum gravity," quant-ph/0206090 (2002).

  6. J. Król, "Set theoretical forcing in quantum mechanics and AdS/CFT correspondence," to appear in Int. J. Theor. Phys. quant-ph/0303089 (2003).

  7. A. Kock and C. J. Mikkelsen, "Topos-theoretic factorization of non-standard extensions," in Proc. Victoria Symposium on Non-standard Analysis, A. Hurd and P. Loeb, (eds.) (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1974), pp. 122-143.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. von Neuman and G. Birkhoff, Ann. Math. 37, 823(1936).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Smolin, "Quantum gravity with a positive cosmological constant," hep-th/0209079 (2002).

  10. J. Väänänen, "Second order logic and foundations of mathematics," Bull. Symb. Logic 7(4), 504(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Lawvere, "Continuously variable sets; algebraic geometry=geometric logic," in Logic Coll. Vol. 73 (North-Holland, Bristol, 1975), p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. E. Reyes and I. Moerdijk, Models for Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis (Springer, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Benioff, "Models of Zermelo–Frankel set theory as carriers for the mathematics of physics I, II," J. Math. Phys. 17(5), 618-628, 629–640 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Scedrov, "Forcing and classifying topoi," Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 45(295), (1984).

  15. S. Mac Lane and I. Moerdijk, Sheaves in Geometry and Logic. A First Introduction to Topos Theory (Springer, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Kunen, Set Theory. An Introduction to Independence Proofs (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Bartoszynski and H. Judach, Set Theory. On the Structure of the Real Line (Peters, Wellesley, Massachusetts, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. L. Bell, Boolean-Valued Models and Independence Proofs in Set Theory, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Takeuti, "Two applications of logic to mathematics," Math. Soc. Japan 13, Kano Memorial Lecture 3(1978).

  20. S. Koppelberg, Handbook of Boolean Algebras, Vol. 1, J. D. Monk, (ed.) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Private communication with G. Takeuti.

  22. T. Jech, Set Theory, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, Heildelberg, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Balcar, T. Jech, and J. Zapletal, "Semi Cohen Boolean algebras," Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 87, 187-208 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Jech, "Abstract theory of Abelian operator algebras: An application of forcing," Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 289(1), 133-162 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Ozawa, "Forcing in nonstandard analysis," Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 68, 263-297 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Ozawa, "Scott incomplete Boolean ultrapowers of the real line," J. Symb. Logic 60(1), 160-171 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Takeuti, "Quantum set theory," in Current Issues in Quantum Logic, E. Beltrametti and B. C. van Frassen, (eds.) (Plenum, New York, 1981), p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. J. Keisler and C. C. Chang, Model Theory, 3rd edn. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Murakami, "Standardization principle of nonstandard universes," J. Symb. Logic 64(4), 1645-1655 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Blass, "End extensions, conservative extensions, and the Rudin–Frolik ordering," Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 225, 325-340 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Thiemann, "Introduction to modern canonical quantum general relativity," gr-qc/0110054 (2001).

  32. A. Robinson, Non-Standard Analysis, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Polchinski, String Theory. Superstring Theory and Beyond, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).

  34. J. Polchinski, "Dirichlet branes and Ramond–Ramond charges," Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4724(1995).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. L. Petersen, "Introduction to the Maldacena conjecture on AdS/CFT," preprint Niels Bohr Institute, NBI-HE-99-05 (1999).

  36. R. E. Gompf and A. I. Stipsicz, An Introduction to 4-Manifolds and Kirby Calculus (American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  37. R. C. Kirby, The Topology of 4-Manifolds, Lectures Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1374 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. H. Brans, J. Math. Phys. 35, 5494(1994).

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Sładkowski, "Gravity on exotic R4's with few symmetries," Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 311(2001).

    Google Scholar 

  40. M. H. Freedman, "The topology of four-dimensional manifolds," J. Diff. Geom. 17, 357-453 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ž Bižaca and R. Gompf, "Elliptic surfaces and some simple exotic R4's," J. Diff. Geom. 43, 458-504 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  42. S. DeMichelis and M. Freedman, "Uncountably many exotic R4's in standard 4-space," J. Diff. Geom. 35, 219-254 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  43. T. Jech, Multiple Forcing, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Vol. 88 (Cambridge University Press, 1986).

  44. T. Asselmeyer, "Generation of source terms in general relativity by differential structures," Class. Quant. Grav. 14, 749-758 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Robinson, "Topics in non-archimedean mathematics," in Collected Papers (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 99-112.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Arnsdorf and L. Smolin, "The Maldacena conjecture and Rehren duality," hep-th/0106073 (2001).

  47. J. Polchinski and M. J. Strassler, "The string dual of a confining four-dimensional gauge theory," hep-th/0003136 (2000).

  48. J. L. Bell, "A new approach to quantum logic," Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 37, 83-99 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  49. E. Witten, "Supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory on a four-manifold," J. Math. Phys. 35(10), 5101(1994).

    Google Scholar 

  50. S. Donaldson, "An application of gauge theory to the topology of 4-manifolds," J. Diff. Geom. 18, 269-316 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  51. R. Mansfield, "The theory of Boolean ultrapowers," Ann. Math. Logic 2, 297-323 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Król, J. Background Independence in Quantum Gravity and Forcing Constructions. Foundations of Physics 34, 361–403 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019620.04821.a2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000019620.04821.a2

Navigation