Skip to main content

Philosophy of Science and the Technological Dimension of Science

  • Chapter
Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 111))

Abstract

Modern science forms an inseparable whole with modern technology. A good deal, if not the greater part of present-day scientific research takes place in industrial research laboratories where science is practised in a technological setting and is exploited for technological ends. In The Netherlands, for instance, 60 to 70% of all the research in physics takes place in, or is financed by industry. For other highly industrialised countries the situation is not very much different. The foregoing means that scientists working on unified field theories, cosmological models, the foundations of quantum mechanics, evolution theory etc. can hardly be said to represent the whole of modern science. Clearly they form a minority among the community of scientists. Nevertheless, philosophers of science tend to direct their attention to the work of this minority and to base their models of science on it. As a consequence, the technological dimension of science, and the methodological problems connected with it, have stayed in the dark. However, in order to arrive at an adequate picture of modern science and of the way it develops, its technological dimension should be taken into account. For instance, the fact that solid state physics has become, in the course of this century, one of the major fields of research within the physical sciences, can only be understood on the basis of the technological relevance of the kind of knowledge produced by this type of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agassi, J., ‘The confusion between science and technology in the standard philosophies of science’, in Rapp 1974a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casimir, H. B. G., Haphazard Reality, Harper and Row, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M., Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoddeson, L., ‘The discovery of the point-contact transistor’, in HSPS 12(1) 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langhaar, H. L., Dimensional Analysis and Theory of Models, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, O., ‘The science-technology relationship’, in B. Barnes and D. Edge (eds.), Science in Context, MTT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1982, p. 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N., ‘Scientific discovery and commensurability of meaning’, this volume, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, F., (ed.) Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology, Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, (1974a, 1974b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, F., ‘Technology and natural science — A methodological investigation’, in Rapp 1974a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumpf, H., ‘Gedanken zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Technikwissenschaften’, in H. Lenk and S. Moser (eds.), Techne, Technik, Technologie, Verlag Dokumentation, Pullach bei Munchen, 1973, pp. 82–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarlemijn, A., ‘Analogy analysis and transistor research’, Methodology and Science, 20 (3), 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarlemijn, A. and Kroes, P., ‘Technological analogies and their logical nature’, in P. T. Durbin (ed.) Technology and Contemporary Life, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolimowski, H., ‘The structure of thinking in technology’, in Rapp 1974a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szücs, E., Similitude and Modelling, Fundamental Studies in Engineering, Vol. 2, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W. G., ‘The air-propellor tests of W. F. Durand and E. P. Lesley: a case study in technological methodology’, Technology and Culture 20 (1979), 712–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W. G., ‘Control-volume analysis: a difference in thinking between engineering and physics’, Technology and Culture 23 (1982) 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, W. G., ‘Technological knowledge without science: the innovation of flush riveting in American airplanes, ca. 1930-ca. 1950’, Technology and Culture 25 (1984), 540–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kroes, P. (1989). Philosophy of Science and the Technological Dimension of Science. In: Gavroglu, K., Goudaroulis, Y., Nicolacopoulos, P. (eds) Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 111. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3025-4_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3025-4_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7860-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-3025-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics