Skip to main content
Log in

Trust and Distrust Constructing Unity and Fragmentation of Organisational Culture

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the coexistence of trust and distrust has been acknowledged in previous literature, the understanding of their connection with organisational culture is limited. This study examines how trust and distrust construct the unity and fragmentation of organisational culture. Productive working relationships can be characterised by high trust, but strong ties and high trust may also account for false organisational unity. This study shows that trust and distrust can co-exist and distrust may even increase trust in particular situations. Moreover, we describe how the cognitive and affective components of trust and distrust relate to the unity and fragmentation of organisational culture. We present an empirical case study of a company where tension and distrust between top management, middle management and shop stewards affected the organisational culture. The study contributes to earlier research by discussing trust as a multidimensional and dynamic phenomenon. The study shows how the affective and cognitive components of trust and distrust constitute the unity and fragmentation of organisational culture. We propose that if an organisation is willing to improve its ethics, it should rely on fragmentation rather than unity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addleson, M., Brumburgh, S., & Chawla, R. (2005). From fragmentation to aligning: Organizational coaching and ten conversations for organizing knowledge work. Reflections, 6(6/7), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M. (2013). Understanding organizational culture (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, R., & Hanappi-Egger, E. (2014). Can trust flourish where institutionalized distrust reigns? In J. D. Harris, B. T. Moriarty, & A. C. Wicks (Eds.), Public trust in business (pp. 266–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bews, N. F., & Rossouw, G. J. (2002). A role for business ethics in facilitating trustworthiness. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. (2014). At the crossroads of trust and distrust: Scepticism and ambivalence toward business. In J. D. Harris, B. T. Moriarty, & A. C. Wicks (Eds.), Public trust in business (pp. 86–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brien, A. (1998). Professional ethics and the culture of trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The meaning(s) of trust. A content analysis of the diverse conceptualization of trust in scholarly research on business relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, M. (2003). Corporate espionage and workplace trust/distrust. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & McGrath, R. G. (2001). Organizations unfettered: Organizational form in an information-intensive economy. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1135–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. A., & Dienhart, J. (2013). Moral and amoral conceptions of trust, with an application in organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S., & Schilke, O. (2014). The role of public, relational, and organizational trust in economic affairs. In J. D. Harris, B. T. Moriarty, & A. C. Wicks (Eds.), Public trust in business (pp. 154–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, E., & Ramus, T. (2012). The Italian Economia Aziendale and Catholic social teaching: How to apply the common good principle at the managerial level. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Tan, H. H. (2000). The trusted general manager and business unit performance: Empirical evidence of a competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 563–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeiss, S. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Fahrbach, C. M. (2015). Doing well by doing good? Analyzing the relationship between CEO ethical leadership and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 635–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Survival, reputation, and success. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T. (1994). Is it a jungle out there? Trust, distrust, and the construction of social reality. Dialogue, 33, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M., & Van Buren, H. J, I. I. I. (2010). Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organisation-stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2008). Does familiarity breed trust? Revisiting the antecedents of trust. Managerial Decision Economics, 29, 165–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1983). Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Mein: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D., & Wicks, A. C. (2014). Public trust and trust in particular firm-stakeholder interaction: A theoretical model and implications for management. In J. D. Harris, B. T. Moriarty, & A. C. Wicks (Eds.), Public trust in business (pp. 170–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hassard, J., Kelemen, M., & Wolfram-Cox, J. (2008). Disorganization theory: Explorations in alternative organizational analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, M., Long, C. P., & Sitkin, S. B. (2014). Cultivating follower trust: Are all leader behaviors equally influential. Organization Studies, 35(2), 1867–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingenhoff, D., & Sommer, K. (2010). Trust in companies and in CEOs: A comparative study of the main influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R., & George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., & Cooper, C. D. (2009). The repair of trust: A dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 401–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberley, N., & Härtel, C. E. J. (2007). Building a climate of trust during organizational change: The mediating role of justice perceptions and emotion. In C. E. J. Härtel, N. M. Ashkanasy, & W. J. Zerbe (Eds.), Research on emotion in organizations: Functionality, intentionality and morality (Vol. 3, pp. 237–264). Oxford: Emerald.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. An introductory to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lämsä, A.-M., & Pučėtaitė, R. (2006). Development of organizational trust among employees from a contextual perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lämsä, A.-M., & Savolainen, T. (2000). Managerial commitment to strategic change. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21(6), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtimäki, H., & Karintaus, K. (2013a). The social embeddedness of strategy implementation. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 2(2), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtimäki, H., & Karintaus, K. (2013b). Building organizational advantage: Social capital in multinational enterprises. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 23(4/5), 314–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2009). Trust, distrust and building social capital. In V. O. Bartkus & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Social capital Reaching out, reaching in (pp. 275–303). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Brinsfield, C. (2012). Measuring trust beliefs and behaviours. In F. Lyon, G. Möllering, & M. N. K. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on trust (pp. 29–39). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationship. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114–139). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 439–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. Journal of Management, 32(6), 991–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limerick, D., & Cunnington, B. (1993). Managing the new organization. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. (2003). Cultures within culture: Unity and diversity of two generations of employees in state-owned enterprises. Human Relations, 56(4), 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design. An interactive approach. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. F. (2008). Short stories at work: Storytelling as an indicator of organizational commitment. Group Organization Management, 33(2), 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • McPeak, M. (2001). Tackling fragmentation and building unity in an international nongovernmental organization. Non-Profit Management and Leadership, 11(4), 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D. (2012). The firm as a “community of persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina-Morales, F. X., & Martinez-Fernandez, M. T. (2009). Too much love in the neighbourhood can hurt: How an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1013–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J. (2009). Capitalizing on connections: Social capital and strategic management. In V. O. Bartkus & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Reaching out, reaching in (pp. 205–236). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., Gratton, L., & Rocha, H. O. (2005). Knowledge and relationships: When cooperation is the norm. European Management Review, 2(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A., Kiazad, K., Miao, Q., & Cooper, B. (2014). Examining the cognitive and affective trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and organizational citizenship: A case of the head leading the heart? Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M. (2000). Organizational culture and identity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pučėtaitė, R., & Lämsä, A.-M. (2008). Developing organizational trust through advancement of employees’ work ethics in a post-socialist context. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pučėtaitė, R., Lämsä, A.-M., & Novelskaitė, A. (2010). Building organizational trust in a low-trust societal context. Baltic Journal of Management, 5(2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristig, K. (2009). The impact of perceived organizational support and trustworthiness on trust. Management Research News, 32(7), 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasi, V., & Arenius, P. (2008). International new ventures and social networks: Advantage or liability? European Management Journal, 26(6), 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M. N. K., Dietz, G., & Thornhill, A. (2014). Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing? Human Relations, 67(6), 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M. N. K., & Thornhill, A. (2004). Trust and mistrust in organizations: An exploration using an organizational justice framework. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 493–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroedk, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behaviour influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searl, R., Den Hartog, D. N., Weibel, A., Gillespie, N., Six, F., Hatzakis, T., & Skinner, D. (2011). Trust in the employer: The role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1069–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P., & Kim, D. H. (2012). From fragmentation to integration: Building learning communities. Reflections, 12(4), 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirokova, G., & McDougall-Covin, P. (2012). The role of social networks and institutions in the internationalization of Russian entrepreneurial firms: Do they matter? Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 10, 177–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1993). Approaches to organisational culture and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Six, F. E. (2007). Building interpersonal trust within organizations: A relational signalling perspective. Journal of Management and Governance, 11, 285–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrall, D. (2005). The fragmentation of a railway: A study of organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 471–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasiljevienė, N. (2000). Verslo etika ir elgesio kodeksai [Business ethics and codes of conduct]. Kaunas: VU KHF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasiljevienė, N. (2004). Etikos infrastruktūros diegimas sveikatos priežiūros organizacijose [Implementation of ethics infrastructure in health care organizations]. Vilnius: University of Vilnius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behaviours. Academy of Management Review, 23, 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A., Berman, S., & Jones, T. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of Management Review, 24, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 377–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, E. (1989). On the naming of the rose: Interests and multiple meanings as elements of organizational culture. Organization Studies, 10(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We want to express our gratitude to Tekes—The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation and to the case company for making this research project possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Kujala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kujala, J., Lehtimäki, H. & Pučėtaitė, R. Trust and Distrust Constructing Unity and Fragmentation of Organisational Culture. J Bus Ethics 139, 701–716 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2915-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2915-7

Keywords

Navigation