Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton July 2, 2016

Edusemiotics of meaningful learning experience: Revisiting Kant’s pedagogical paradox and Greimas’ semiotic square

  • Jani Kukkola EMAIL logo and Eetu Pikkarainen
From the journal Semiotica

Abstract

In this article we examine the educational process and learning from the edusemiotic point of view in terms of meaningful experience and meaningful action. A conception of meaningful experience is central in many branches of educational thinking, from pragmatism to existentialism. We analyze this conception from two traditional and somewhat remote perspectives, utilizing some themes of Kant’s educational philosophy on the one hand and Greimas’ semiotics on the other. Kant’s views of human formative powers – Bildung – will be described as a basic philosophy of learning experience. Kant’s theory is then critiqued from the perspective of existentialist educational philosophy. Concepts of meaningful learning and experience are further clarified utilizing Greimas’ semiotic tools and, specifically, his semiotic square. Finally, the question of meaningful learning experience is related to Kant’s pedagogical paradox and the educator’s role in the pedagogical process.

References

Benner, Dietrich. 1996. Allgemeine Pädagogik: Eine systematisch-problemgeschichtliche Einführung in die Grundstruktur pädagogischen Denkens und Handelns. Weinheim: Juventa.Search in Google Scholar

Biesta, Gert. 2002. How general can bildung be? Reflections on the future of a modern educational ideal. Journal of Philosophy of Education 36(3). 377–390.10.1163/9789004401105_003Search in Google Scholar

Bollnow, Otto F. 1959. Existenzphilosophie und Pädagogik: Versuch über unstetige Former der Erziehung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Search in Google Scholar

Bollnow, Otto F. 1966. Krise und neuer Anfang: Beiträge zur pädagogischen Anthropologie. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.10.14315/prth-1967-jg82Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. 2009. Reason in philosophy: Animating ideas. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674053618Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2004. Semiotics and Jakob von Uexkull’s concept of Umwelt. Sign Systems Studies 32(1). 11–34.10.12697/SSS.2004.32.1-2.01Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1985. Democracy and education (The middle works of John Dewey: 1899–1924. Volume 9), J. A. Boydston (ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flitner, Wilhelm. 1950. Allgemeine Pädagogik. Stuttgart: Klett.Search in Google Scholar

Floch, Jean-Marie. 2001. Semiotics, marketing, and communication: Beneath the signs, the strategies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1980. Strukturaalista Semantiikkaa [Sémantique structurale: recherche de méthode]. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1987. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. London: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotics and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1974 [1781/1787]. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Werkausgabe Band III. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1992. Kant on education, A. Churton (trans.). Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Search in Google Scholar

Klafki, Wolfgang. 1985. Neue Studien Zur Bildungstheorie Und Didaktik: Beiträge Zur Kritisch-Konstruktiven Didaktik. Weinheim: Beltz.Search in Google Scholar

Koskela, Jani. 2012. Discontinuity as a theoretical foundation to pedagogy: Existential phenomenology in Otto Friedrich Bollnow’s philosophy of education. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis E126.Search in Google Scholar

Kukkola, Jani & Eetu Pikkarainen. in press. Edusemiotics, existential semiotics, and existential pedagogy. In Inna Semetsky (ed.), Edusemiotics: A handbook. Singapore: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, E. 1971. Bildung. In J. Ritter (ed.), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Band 1, A-C, 921–937. Basel: Schwabe.Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose justice? Which rationality? London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Makkreel, R. A. 1990. Imagination and interpretation in Kant. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mollenhauer, Klaus. 2013. Forgotten connections: On culture and upbringing. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315883007Search in Google Scholar

Pikkarainen, Eetu. 2011. The semiotics of education: A new vision in an old landscape. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43(10). 1135–1144.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00632.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pikkarainen, Eetu. 2014a. Competence as a key concept of educational theory: A semiotic point of view. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48(4). 621–636.10.1111/1467-9752.12080Search in Google Scholar

Pikkarainen, Eetu. 2014b. Education, values, and authority: A semiotic view. In Inna Semetsky & Andrew Stables (eds.), Pedagogy and edusemiotics: Theoretical challenges/practical opportunities, 91–105. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-857-2_9Search in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna & Andrew Stables (eds.). 2014. Pedagogy and edusemiotics: Theoretical challenges/practical opportunities. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-857-2Search in Google Scholar

Siljander, Pauli, Ari Kivelä, & Ari Sutinen (eds.) (2012). Theories of Bildung and growth: Connections and controversies between continental educational thinking and American pragmatism. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-031-6Search in Google Scholar

Stables, Andrew. 2005. Living and learning as semiotic engagement: A new theory of education. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stables, Andrew & Inna Semetsky. 2015. Edusemiotics: Semiotic philosophy as an educational foundation. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315851860Search in Google Scholar

Stojanov, Krassimir. 2006. Bildung und Anerkennung. Soziale Voraussetzungen von Selbst-Entwicklung und Welt-Erschlieβung. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Stojanov, Krassimir. 2007. Bildung as deontic scorekeeping? Toward a social-pragmatist approach in educational theory. In Papers of the annual conference of the Society for Philosophy of Education of Great Britain.Search in Google Scholar

Tarasti, Eero. 2012. Existential semiotics and cultural psychology. In Jaan Valsiner (ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology, 316–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0016Search in Google Scholar

Thom, René. 1985. From the icon to the symbol. In R. E. Innis (ed.), Semiotics: An introductory anthology, 275–291. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wulf, Christoph (2003). Educational science: Hermeneutics, empirical research, critical theory. Münster: Waxmann. Available at http://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2010/1564/pdf/Educational_Science_final_D.pdf (accessed 30 May 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-7-2
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 31.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0124/html
Scroll to top button