Skip to main content
Log in

MacIntyre on Tradition, Rationality, and Relativism

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MacIntyre’s critique of liberalism relies crucially on a distinctive moral particularism, for which morality and rationality are fundamentally tradition-constituted. In light of this, some have detected in his work a moral relativism, radically in tension with his endorsement of a Thomist universalism. I dispute this reading, arguing instead that MacIntyre is a consistent universalist who pays due attention to the moral-epistemic importance of traditions. Analysing his teleological understanding of rational enquiry, I argue that this approach shows how it is possible, dialectically, to reconcile the particularity of our starting-points with the assertion of universal truths. What MacIntyre offers, I contend, is a moral universalism that avoids the pitfalls of its liberal counterpart, and invites an important meta-theoretical shift with respect to the scope for toleration and social critique and toleration in contemporary pluralist society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kuna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuna, M. MacIntyre on Tradition, Rationality, and Relativism. Res Publica 11, 251–273 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-0558-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-0558-8

Keywords

Navigation