Skip to main content
Log in

Addressing Clinical Misconduct: Resigning and Whistleblowing in Clinical Ethics Consultation

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical ethics consultants occasionally encounter unethical and/or unprofessional behavior as part of their normal job functions. In this article, we explore whether resigning (i.e., threatening resignation or resigning) and whistleblowing are acceptable methods ethics consultants can use to address these situations. Per our analysis, whether one considers ethics consultants private or public employees, loyal to their employer or to patients, families, and the public, resigning and whistleblowing are all acceptable, if not obligatory, actions of ethics consultants in certain circumstances. In this article, we analyze salient characteristics of ethics consultation as a profession as they pertain to resignation and whistleblowing in the context of ethics consultation. We also present tentative criteria for when ethics consultants are justified, if not obligated, to resign or blow the whistle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2014). Code of ethics and professional responsibilities for healthcare ethics consultants. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

  • Arnold, R. M., et al. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation (2nd ed.). American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B., Dubler, N., Blustein, J., Caplan, A., Kahn, J. P., Kass, N., Lo, B., Moreno, J., Sugarman, J., & Zoloth, L. (2002). Bioethics consultation in the private sector. Hastings Center Report, 32(3), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cal. Health & Safety Code § 1278.5 (West 2020).

  • Callahan, E. S., & Dworkin, T. M. (2000). The state of state whistleblower protection. American Business Law Journal, 38(1), 99–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 8–2–123 (West 2019).

  • Cook, A. F., & Hoas, H. (2008). Ethics and rural healthcare: What really happens? What might help? The American Journal of Bioethics, 8(4), 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costain v. Sunbury Primary Care, P.A., 2008 ME 142, ¶ 7, 954 A.2d 1051, 1053 (Me. 2008).

  • Cummins, D. (2002). The professional status of bioethics consultation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 23(1), 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1996). Some paradoxes of whistleblowing. Business & Professional Ethics, 15(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennison v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections, 268 F. Supp. 2d 387, 398 (M.D. Pa. 2003).

  • Dobel, J. P. (1999). The ethics of resigning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(2), 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubler, N. N., & Liebman, C. B. (2011). Bioethics mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions. Vanderbilt University Press.

  • Fiester, A. (2015). Contentious conversations: Using mediation techniques in difficult clinical ethics consultations. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 26(4), 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. C., & Boverman, M. (1996). Heroism, martyrs, and other choices. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 7(4), 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Bottrell, M. M., Berkowitz, K. A., Chanko, B. L., Foglia, M. B., & Pearlman, R. A. (2010). IntegratedEthics: An innovative program to improve ethics quality in health care. Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Berkowitz, K. A. Chanko, B. L., & Powell, T. (n.d.). Ethics consultation: Responding to ethics questions in health care. National Center for Ethics in Health Care: Veterans Health Administration.

  • Frader, J. E. (1992). Political and interpersonal aspects of ethics consultation. Theoretical Medicine, 13, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furrow, L., Arnold, R. M., & Parker, L. S. (1993). Preventative ethics: Expanding the horizons of clinical ethics. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 4(4), 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasparetto, A., Jox, R. J., & Picozzi, M. (2018). The notion of neutrality in clinical ethics consultation. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 13(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper v. Univ. of Louisville, 559 S.W.3d 796, 811 (Ky. 2018).

  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, PL.104–191, August 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1936).

  • Kuperberg, E. (2019). Clinical ethics needs assessment. Adapting clinical ethics to a population health program. HEC Forum, 32(1), 21–32.

  • Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555, 559–62 (1992).

  • MacDougall, D. R. (2014). Whistleblowing and the bioethicist’s public obligations. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 23, 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 26, § 833 (West 2021).

  • N.Y. Lab. Law § 741 (McKinney’s 2003).

  • N.Y. Lab. Law § 740 (McKinney’s 2003).

  • Nelson, C. (2012). The familiar foundation and the fuller sense: Ethics consultation and narrative. The Permanente Journal, 16(2), 60–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlowski, J. P., Hein, S., Christensen, J. A., Meinke, R., & Sincich, T. (2006). Why doctors use or do not use ethics consultation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(9), 499–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pa. Stat. Ann. § 1422(West 2014).

  • Pa. Stat. Ann. §1423 (West 2014).

  • Pennsylvania Whistleblower Act, 43 Pa. Stat. Ann. § 1422 (West 2014).

  • Pope, T. M. (2011). Legal briefing: Healthcare ethics committees. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 22(1), 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2010, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A (2010).

  • Schumann, J. H., & Alfandre, D. (2008). Clinical ethics decision making: The four topics approach. Seminars in Medical Practice, 11, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scofield, G. R. (2008). What is medical ethics consultation? Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 36(1), 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, S., & Baylis, F. (2003). The feminist health care ethics consultant as architect and advocate. Public Affairs Quarterly, 17(2), 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L., & Weise, K. L. (2007). The goals of ethics consultation: Rejecting the role of “ethics police.” The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 42–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarzian, A. J., Wocial, L. D., & ASBH Clinical Ethics Consultation Affairs Committee. (2015). A code of ethics for health care ethics consultants: Journey to the present and implications for the field. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(5), 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tides v. The Boeing Co., 644 F.3d 809, 815 (9th Cir. 2011).

  • Walker, M. U. (1993). Keeping moral space open: New images of ethics consulting. Hastings Center Report, 23(2), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8) (1989).

  • Whistleblower Act, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 61.102 (West 2012).

  • Workforce Dev. Cabinet v. Gaines, 276 S.W.3d 789, 793 (Ky. 2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following for their invaluable help, comments, and criticisms: Marion Danis, Yosef Kuperman, and Anita Tarzian. The authors would like to especially thank Melissa Bottrell for her exceptional feedback, resources, and help in general on this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuperberg, E., Dauber, M.S. Addressing Clinical Misconduct: Resigning and Whistleblowing in Clinical Ethics Consultation. HEC Forum 35, 161–183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09459-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09459-3

Keywords

Navigation