Skip to main content
Log in

From evidence to value-based transition: the agroecological redesign of farming systems

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The agroecological transition of agriculture not only requires changes in practices but also in ways of thinking and in their underlying values. Agroecology proposes broad scientific principles that need to be adapted to the singularities of each farm. This contextualization leads to the identification of agroecological practices that work locally and could serve as evidence-based practices to be transferred to local practitioners. This strategy was tested in a 4-year experiment conducted with dairy-sheep farmers in the South of France. The aim was to collectively engage in the agroecological transition. Our work focused on the creation of a diagnostic tool that was used to analyze local farms and identify virtuous practices to be promoted locally as evidence-based practices. But this strategy came up against the complexity and singularity of the situations to be transformed: not only was no evidence found but the construction of the diagnostic tool itself led to controversy concerning the models of agriculture to be promoted. The experiment then took a pragmatic turn: on-farm workshops were organized to enable farmers to benefit from the professional judgment of peer farmers who were willing to help their colleagues accomplish their agroecological transition. The diagnostic tool, which was designed to be prescriptive, was then used to judge the social acceptability of solutions that made sense in each farmer’s own situation. Our experiment led us to conclude that managing the agro-ecological transition of farmers and their farming system is better conceived as a value-based process than as an evidence-based one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AVEM:

Association Vétérinaires Eleveurs du Millavois

CETA:

Centre d’Etude et Technique Agricole

EBITDA:

Earnings Before Interests, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization

EM:

Equivalent Milk

EF:

Equivalent Fuel

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization [United Nations]

INRAE:

Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’alimentation et l’Environnement

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Association Eleveurs Vétérinaires du Millavois and the partners of the SALSA project for their cooperation in this work.

Funding

This work was funded by the Fondation de France, by the Conseil Régional Occitanie (PSDR ATARI) and by the DIVERSIFOOD European research (Grant Agreement No. 633571).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All three authors participated in the experiment. C.L. designed and led the redesign phase of the farms. She wrote the chronicle of the project. L.H. proposed the analytical framework. The analyses were performed by all three authors. The writing and revision processes were led by L.H.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Hazard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hazard, L., Couix, N. & Lacombe, C. From evidence to value-based transition: the agroecological redesign of farming systems. Agric Hum Values 39, 405–416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10258-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10258-2

Keywords

Navigation