Skip to main content
Log in

Platonic Contrariety (enantia): Ancestor of the Aristotelian Notion of Contradiction (antiphasis)?

  • Published:
Logica Universalis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to analyse the archeology of the concept of contradiction, more precisely in Plato, and to reveal the influence that the latter had on Aristotle’s reflection on contradiction and contrariety. This paper will show that it is possible to find examples of a notion of contradiction in Plato’s refutative dialogues, in which Socrates is described as refuting his interlocutors by demonstrating the contrary of their initial thesis. However, Plato never used the word antiphasis to name the act of contradicting oneself (this word seems to be the invention of Aristotle), but preferred the expression enantia legein heautôi, which means “to say the contrary to oneself”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Annas J.: An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blanché, R.: La logique et son histoire d’Aristote à Russell. éditions A. Colin, Paris (1970)

  3. Dorion L.-A.: La dépersonnalisation de la dialectique chez Aristote. Arch. Philos. 60, 597–613 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorion, L.-A.: Le destin ambivalent de la sixième définition du Sophiste : l’exemple d’Aristote et de Clément d’Alexandrie”. In: Melkevik, Narbonne (eds.) Une philosophie dans l’histoire : hommage à Raymond Klibansky, pp. 47–64. Presses de l’Université Laval, Québec (2001)

  5. Dorion, L.-A.: Aristotle’s definition of the elenchus in the light of Plato’s Sophiste. In: Fink (ed.) The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, pp. 251–269. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

  6. Irwin T.: Plato’s Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerferd G.B.: The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lukasiewicz, J.: Du principe de contradiction chez Aristote. éditions de l’Éclat, Paris (2000)

  9. McPherran M.L.: Plato’ Republic, A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Notomi N.: The Unity of Plato’s Sophist: Between the Sophist and the Philosopher. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Rankin, H.D.: Ouk estin antilegein. In: Kerferd, G.B. (ed.) The Sophists and Their Legacy, pp. 25–37. Frank Steiner Verlag, Wiesbaden (1981)

  12. Robinson R.: Plato’s separation of reason from Desire. Phronesis XVI(2), 38–48 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sidgwick H.: The sophists. J. Philol IV, 288–307 (1872)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Hoonacker, A.: Probus: Traité sur les. Premiers Analytiques d’Aristote in Journal Asiatique, Tome XVI, Paris (1900). http://remacle.org/bloodwolf/philosophes/probus/analytiques.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geneviève Lachance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lachance, G. Platonic Contrariety (enantia): Ancestor of the Aristotelian Notion of Contradiction (antiphasis)?. Log. Univers. 10, 143–156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-016-0141-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-016-0141-4

Mathematics Subject Classification

Keywords

Navigation