Skip to main content

William Crathorn

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy
  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

William Crathorn (fl.1330s), Oxford Dominican whose unique epistemology fueled controversies during Oxford’s “Golden Age” of theology. Crathorn’s thought emerged from the epistemically oriented Ockhamist approach, but it incorporated an older account, in which the perceived object projects “species” which are received in the act of perception and interpreted by the understanding as the basis for formulating ideas about the perceived object. Crathorn argued that the ideas we formulate about the species projected by the object take on the physical characteristics of the object, so that perception of a black cat results in the formulation of an idea that is black, possessing felinity, and so forth. Crathorn’s position was the object of great scorn from his contemporaries, notably Robert Holcot. This led to increased attention of the relation of perceived appearances to the substance behind the perception, and Crathorn recognized that his position entailed a difficulty in a certain distinction between the Aristotelian categories of substance and quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

Primary Sources

  • (1988) Crathorn Quaestionen zum ersten Sentenzenbuch: Einführung und Text, ed. Hoffman F. Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittlealters NF 29. Achendorff, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • (2003) I. Sent., q., trans. Pasnau R. In: The Cambridge translations of medieval philosophical texts, vol III: mind and knowledge, ed. Pasnau R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 245–301

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Gelber H (1984) I cannot tell a lie: Hugh Lawton’s critique of Ockham on mental language. Francsc Stud 44:141–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelber H (2004) It could have been otherwise: contingency and necessity in Dominiacn theology, 1300–1350. E.J. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman F (1971) Der Satz als Zeichen der Theologischen Aussage bei Holcot, Crathorn, und Gregor von Rimini. Der Begriff der Repraesantatio im Mittelalter Miscellanea Medievalia 8:296–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman F (1995) Der Wandel in der Scholastischen Argumentation vom 13 Zum 14 Jahrhundert aufgezeigt an zwei Bespielen: Robert Holcot und William Crathorn. Die Bibliotheca Amploniana, Miscellanea Medievalia 23:301–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirjavainen H (2000) Transcendental elements in the semantics of Crathorn. In: Holmström-Hintakka G (ed) Medieval philosophy and modern times. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J (1933) Die Stellung des Oxforder Dominikanerlehrers Crathorn zu Thomas von Aquin. Zeitschrift für Katholische Theologie 57:66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahey S (2008) John Wyclif. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Panaccio C (1996) Le langage mental en discussion: 1320–1335. Les Études Philosophiques 3:323–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau R (1997) Theories of cognition in the later Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Perler D (1997) Crathorn on mental language. In: Marmo C (ed) Vestigia, imagines, verba, semiotics and logic in medieval theological texts. Brepols, Turnhout, pp 337–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert A. William Crathorn. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/crathorn/

  • Schepers H (1970) Holkot contra dicta Crathorn: I. Quellenkritik und Biographische Auswertung der Bakkalareatsschriften zweier Oxforder Dominikaner des XIV Jahrunderts. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 77:320–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers H (1972) Holkot contra dicta Crathorn: II. Das significatum per propositionem. Aufbau und Kritik einer Nominalistischen Theorie über den Gegenstand des Wissens. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 79:106–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachau K (1987) Wodeham, Crathorn, and Holcot: the development of the complexe significabile. In: de Rijk LM, Braakhuis H (eds) Logos and pragma. Ingenium, Nijmegen, pp 161–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Tachau K (1988) Vision and certitude in the age of Ockham. Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters. E.J. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R (1989) Crathorn versus Ockham. Fransc Stud 49:347–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lahey, S.E. (2011). William Crathorn. In: Lagerlund, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_527

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_527

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9729-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics