Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Compositionality and the analysis of anaphora

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bach, E.: 1980, ‘Tenses and Aspects as Functions on Verb-phrases’, in C. Rohrer (ed.),Time, Tense and Quantifiers. Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on the Logic of Tense and Quantification, Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, E. and B. Partee: 1981, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’, inCLS 16.

  • Bennett, M.: 1975,Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English (corrected version), Ph.D. Diss. UCLA, 1974, Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1973, ‘Conditions on Transformations’, in S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (eds.),Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York, Reprinted in Chomsky, N.: 1977,Essays on Form and Interpretation, North Holland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: 1975, ‘Conditions on Rules of Grammar’, in R. Cole (ed.),Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, Indiana University Press. Reprinted in Chomsky, N., 1977,op. cit.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1980, ‘On Binding’, inLinguistic Inquiry 11, No. 1.

  • Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1975,Montague's Semantic Theory and Transformational Syntax, Ph.D. Diss, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 10,Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, E.: 1980,The Syntax and Semantics of Questions in Swedish, Ph.D. Diss, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. and I. Sag: 1981, ‘Passive and Reflexives in Phrase Structure Grammar’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Mathematical Center Tracts, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1979, ‘Infinitives and Context in Montague Grammar’, in S. Davis and M. Mithun (eds.),Linguistics, Philosophy and Montague Grammar, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, T.: 1978, ‘Compositionality and the Form of Rules in Montague Grammar’, in J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof (eds.),Amsterdam Papers in Formal Grammar 77, Proceedings of the Second Amsterdam Colloquium on Montague Grammar and Related Topics.

  • Janssen, T.: 1979, ‘On Problems Concerning the Quantification Rules in Montague Grammar’, in C. Rohrer (ed.),op cit.

  • Keenan, E. and L. Faltz: 1978,Logical Types for Natural Language, UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 3.

  • Ladusaw, W.: 1980,Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, Ph.D. Diss., University of Texas, Indiana University Linguistics Club.

  • Landman, F. and I. Moerdijk: 1981,Morphological Features and Conditions on Rules in Montague Grammar, Amsterdam Papers in Formal Grammar III, University of Amsterdam.

  • Landman, F. and I. Moerdijk: 1982, ‘Compositionality and Morphology’, ms.

  • Montague, R.: 1970a, ‘English as a Formal Language’, in B. Visentini et al. (eds.),Linguaggi i nella Societá e nella Tecnica, Edizione di Comunita, Milan. Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), 1974,Formal Philosophy.. Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1970b, ‘Universal Grammar’, inTheoria 36, Reprinted in R. Thomason, 1974,op. cit.

  • Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik and P. Suppes (eds.),Approaches to Natural Language. Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht. Reprinted in R. Thomason, 1974,op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1973, ‘Some Transformational Extensions of Montague Grammar’, inJournal of Philosophical Logic 2. Reprinted in B. Partee (ed.), 1976,Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York.

  • Partee, B.: 1979a, ‘Constraining Transformational Montague Grammar, A Framework and a Fragment’, in S. Davis and M. Mithun,op. cit.

  • Partee, B.: 1979b, ‘On the Wellformedness Constraint’, in F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.),op. cit.

  • Partee, B. and E. Bach: 1981, ‘Quantification, Pronouns and VP-anaphora’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.),op. cit.

  • Reinhart, T.: 1979, ‘Syntactic Domains for Semantic Rules’, in F. Guentner and S. Schmidt (eds.),Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Fred Landman & Ieke Moerdijk

Authors
  1. Fred Landman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ieke Moerdijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Landman, F., Moerdijk, I. Compositionality and the analysis of anaphora. Linguist Philos 6, 89–114 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868091

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868091

Keywords

Search

Navigation