Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Ethical Reasoning and the Perception of Difficulty with Ethical Dilemmas in Pharmacy Students: Implications for Teaching Professional Ethics

  • Published:
Teaching Business Ethics

Abstract

The pharmacy profession, as is the case with much of health carein the United States, is undergoing a paradigm change from a profession that hashistorically emphasized the dispensing of prescriptions to one that is more patient-focused. As a result, opportunities for encountering ethical dilemmas may increase. The presentinvestigation explored the relationship between 59 second year pharmacy students' moraldevelopment and their perceptions regarding the difficulty of resolving ethicalproblems commonly found in pharmacy practice. Based on theory it was hypothesized thatthose students who were more advanced in their moral development would perceive as lessproblematic common ethical dilemmas faced by practicing pharmacists. The DefiningIssues Test (DIT) was used as the surrogate measure of students' ethical reasoning. The hypothesis was supported (r = −0.287) at the 0.05 alpha level. The results and implications for educators are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Benor, D. E., N. Notzer, T. J. Sheehan and G. R. Norman: 1984, 'Moral Reasoning as a Criterion for Admission to Medical School,’ Medical Education 18, 423-428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, B. A.: 1993, 'Building an Effective Therapeutic Alliance: Competence, Trustworthiness, and Caring,’ American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 50, 2399-2403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A.: 1980, 'Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature,’ Psychological Bulletin 88, 1-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buerki, R. A. and L. D. Vottero: 1996, Ethical Responsibility in Pharmacy Practice, American Institute of the History of Pharmacy, Madison Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmella, P.: 1985, Moral Judgment: A Study of Professional Business Managers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. L.: 1993, 'Why Professionals Lie: The Impact of Professional Role Conflict on Reporting Accuracy,’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 55, 251-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, A. M.: 1991, 'Ethical Problems in Pharmacy Practice: A Survey of Difficulty and Incidence,’ American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 55, 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, A., C. Powers and L. Kohlberg: 1984, 'The Relationship of Moral Atmosphere to Judgments of Responsibility,’ in W. Kurtines and J. Gewitz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development, Willey Interscience, NY pp. 142-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L., J. Hickey and P. Scharf: 1972, 'The Justice Structure of Prison: A Theory and Intervention,’ The Prison Journal, 3-14.

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, 'Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Socialization,’ in D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research, Rand McNally, Chicago Ill pp. 347-480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krichbaum, K., M. Rowan, L. Duckett, M. Ryden and K. Savik: 1994, 'The Clinical Evaluation Tool: A Measure of the Quality of Clinical Performance Nursing of Baccalaureate Students,’ Journal of Nursing Education 33(9), 395-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latif, D. A., B. A. Berger, S. G. Harris, K. N. Barker, B. G. Felkey, and R. E. Pearson: 1998, 'The Relationship between Community Pharmacists' Moral Reasoning and Components of Clinical Performance,’ Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy 15(3), 210-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leming, J. S.: 1978, 'Cheating Behavior, Situational Influence and Moral Development,’ Journal of Educational Research 71, 214-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L.: 1992, 'Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting,’ Accounting Organizations and Society 17, 239-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A. and D. R. L. Gabhart: 1993, Ethical Reasoning in Accounting and Auditing, Vancouver, BC: CGA-Canada Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1994, 'Background: Theory and Research,’ in D. Narvaez and J. R. Rest (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R.: 1990, DIT Manual: Manual for the Defining Issues Test (3rd edn.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. P.: 1998, Organizational Behavior (8th edn.), Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, T. J., S. D. Husted, D. Candee, C. D. Cook and M. Bargen: 1980, 'Moral Judgment as a Predictor of Clinical Performance,’ Evaluation and the Health Professions 8, 379-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisola, S. W.: 1995, Principled Moral Reasoning as a Predictor of Clinical Performance in Physical Therapy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model,’ Academy of Management 11, 601-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. and S.A. Youngblood: 1990. 'Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior,’ Journal of Applied Psychology 75(4), 378-385.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latif, D.A. The Relationship Between Ethical Reasoning and the Perception of Difficulty with Ethical Dilemmas in Pharmacy Students: Implications for Teaching Professional Ethics. Teaching Business Ethics 5, 107–117 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026502902003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026502902003

Keywords

Navigation