Abstract
Human cognition affects the result of symbolic activity. Evidentiality is a linguistic concept which encodes the source of information and expresses the attitude and confidence of speaker. This paper collects 31 judgments from the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) and local people’s courts in the People’s Republic of China (P.R.C) as the research corpus, and analyzes the evidentiality in four aspects: information source, lingual form, evidential function and speaker’s attitude of the information. It is found in this study that: 1) The information sources are divided into four types as cultural belief, sensory experience, verbal rumor and inferential hypothesis; 2) Lingual form consists of three categories: vocabulary, phrase and compound sentence; 3) Evidentiality in court judgments performs four functions: support with citation, induction with description, paraphrase with less responsibility and summarization with reasoning; 4) The reliability of evidentiality presents a two-tier structure based on different information sources. From the perspective of Peirce’s semiotics, the paper analyzes the judicial practice of court judgments with actual data and proposes some suggestions.
Funding source: National Social Science Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: 20ZDA062
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the major project of the National Social Science Foundation under Grant 20ZDA062.
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 143–169. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.9Search in Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Chafe Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le. 2007. Identification and appraisal of intergenericity in judgments. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University 83(2). 32–37.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le. 2012. Attribution and judicial control in Chinese court judgments: A corpus-based study. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19(1). 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v19i1.27.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le & Cheng Chen. 2019. The construction of relational frame model in Chinese President Xi Jinping’s foreign visit speeches. Text & Talk 39(2). 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2022.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, Jiamin Pei & Marcel Danesi. 2019. A sociosemiotic interpretation of cybersecurity in US legislative discourse. Social Semiotics 29(3). 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587843.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, King Kui Sin & Jian Li. 2008. A discursive approach to legal texts: Court judgments as an example. The Asian ESP Journal 4(1). 14–28.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le & King Kui Sin. 2010. A semiotic interpretation of genre: Court judgments as an example. Semiotica 182. 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2010.053.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le & King Kui Sin. 2011. A sociosemiotic interpretation of linguistic modality in legal settings. Semiotica 185. 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.036.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le & Lianzhen He. 2016. Revisiting judgment translation in Hong Kong. Semiotica 209. 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0007.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, Lijin Sha & Yinglong Zheng. 2009. A semiotic interpretation of legal terms. Contemporary Rhetoric 2. 37–43.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le & Marcel Danesi. 2019. Exploring legal discourse: A sociosemiotic (re) construction. Social Semiotics 29(3). 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, Mingyu Gong & Jian Li. 2017. Conceptualizing cultural discrepancies in legal translation: A case-based study. Semiotica 216. 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0083.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, Mingyu Gong & Jian Li. 2016. Equivalence in legal translation: From a sociosemiotic perspective. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 4. 77–90. https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.CN33-6000/C.2015.09.213.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie & Le Cheng. 2014. Epistemic modality in court judgments: A corpus-driven comparison of civil cases in Hong Kong and Scotland. English for Specific Purposes 33. 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.07.006.Search in Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert. 2007. Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Spanish semi-auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110204483Search in Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 2011. Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.Search in Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2001. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
De Carvalho, Evandro-Menezes. 2011. Semiotics of international law: Trade and translation. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9011-9Search in Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 1998. The category of evidentiality. University of New Mexico PhD diss.Search in Google Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand. 2001. The relation between modality and evidentiality. Linguistische Berichte 9. 201–216.Search in Google Scholar
Donabédian, Anaïd. 2001. Towards a semasiological account of evidentials: An enunciative approach of –er in modern Western Armenian. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00011-4.Search in Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Stanford University PhD diss.Search in Google Scholar
Gombrich, Ernst Hans. 1972. Symbolic images. London: Phaidon.Search in Google Scholar
Hassler, Gerda. 2002. Evidentiality and reported speech in Romance languages. In Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador (eds.), Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains, 143–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.52.11hasSearch in Google Scholar
Houser, Nathan. 2009. Peirce, phenomenology, and semiotics. In Cobley Paul (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, 111–122. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chia-Ling. 2008. Evidentiality in Chinese newspaper reports: Subjectivity/objectivity as a factor. Discourse Studies 10(2). 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087009.Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Zhuanglin. 1994. Evidentiality in language. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 1. 9–15.Search in Google Scholar
Hu, Zhuanglin. 1995. Chinese evidentiality and discourse analysis. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science) 2. 13–23.Search in Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and relevance. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.86Search in Google Scholar
Katriel, Tamar & Marcelo Dascal. 1989. Speaker’s commitment and involvement in discourse. In Yishai Tobin (ed.), From sign to text: A semiotic view of communication, 275–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/fos.20.21katSearch in Google Scholar
Kellogg, Ronald T. 2003. Cognitive psychology, vol. 2. London: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar
Krzyżanowska, Karolina, Sylvia Wenmackers & Igor Douven. 2013. Inferential conditionals and evidentiality. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3. 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-013-9178-4.Search in Google Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert. 2001. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00008-4.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Jian. 2017. A sociosemiotic interpretation of legal terms: A case study on ordinary residence. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University 4. 59–65. https://doi.org/10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1337/c.2017.04.007.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Jian & Yuxiu Sun. 2019. Meaning construction in legislative discourse: A sociosemiotic interpretation on supervision system reform in China. Social Semiotics 29(3). 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587849.Search in Google Scholar
Ma, Li. 2011. Study on evidentiality in spoken Mandarin Chinese. In Proceeding of the 6th IEEE Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference, 283–287. New York: IEEE.10.1109/ITAIC.2011.6030331Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen. 1998. Evidentiality and mirativity in Cantonese: Wo3, wo4, wo5. In Proceedings of the international symposium on Chinese languages and linguistics, 325–334. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, Rolf. 1990. Abstraction, context, and perspectivization: Evidentials in discourse semantics. Theoretical Linguistics 16. 101–164. https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.1990.16.2-3.101.Search in Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. 1995. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pei, Jiamin & Le Cheng. 2019. Discursive profile of international telecommunication regulations as institutional dialogue: A sociosemiotic perspective. Social Semiotics 29(3). 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1681075.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, vol. 8, C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.].Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, Tyler. 2016. Mirativity as surprise: Evidentiality, information, and deixis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45. 1327–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9408-9.Search in Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1980. Course in general linguistics, Mingkai Gao (trans.). Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 2010. Legal culture and cultures of legality. In Laura Grindstaff, M. Lo Ming-Cheng, John R. Hall (eds.), Handbook of cultural sociology, 470–479. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M. 2004. Private language, public laws: The central role of legislative intent in statutory interpretation. Georgetown Law Journal 93. 427.10.2139/ssrn.515022Search in Google Scholar
Sun, Yuxiu & Le Cheng. 2017. Linguistic variation and legal representation in legislative discourse: A corpus-based multi-dimensional study. International Journal of Legal Discourse 2(2). 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0017.Search in Google Scholar
Tantucci, Vittorio. 2016. The multimodal marking of evidentiality: Pragmemes of circumstantial inference and Mandarin written news report. Pragmemes and Theories of Language (6). 477–491.10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_24Search in Google Scholar
Theo, Janssen & Wim van der Wurff (eds.). 1996. Reported speech (Forms and functions of the verb 43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.43Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 1996. Voice in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics 17. 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.501.Search in Google Scholar
Tikhanoff, Vadim, José Fontanari, Angelo Cangelosi & Leonid, I. Perlovsky. 2006. Language and cognition integration through modeling field theory: Category formation for symbol grounding. In Proceeding of International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks-ICANN 2006, 376–385. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/11840817_40Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Mingyu. 2015. Linguistic semiotics. Beijing: Peking University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas A. 1988. Cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil.Search in Google Scholar
White, G. Edward. 1973. The evolution of reasoned elaboration: Jurisprudential criticism and social change. Virginia Law Review 59. 279–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1071994.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Jingjing & Yuxiu Sun. 2020. Study on utterance of administrative law enforcement in van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Legal Discourse 4(2). 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2024.Search in Google Scholar
Ye, Ning, Le Cheng & Yun Zhao. 2019. Identity construction of suspects in telecom and internet fraud discourse: From a sociosemiotic perspective. Social Semiotics 29(3). 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587847.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, Yiheng. 2016. Semiotics: Principles & problems. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, Yongsheng. 2006. Evidential studies in modern Chinese. Modern Foreign Languages 4. 331–337.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
