Abstract
Battles against domestic violence in the People’s Republic of China (hereafter P. R. C.) have been carried out since 1995. In this study, legislative progression of laws related to domestic violence is first examined and clarified; second, findings from the legislative review are investigated on the basis of civil and criminal cases; third, the interaction among social and traditional norms, legislation, and judicial outcomes is explored and interpreted from a sociosemiotic perspective. It is found in this study that: 1) legislation and judicial practices of domestic violence in the P. R. C. are closely intertwined with social and traditional norms; 2) there is a gap between judicial practices dealing with domestic violence and the legislation; 3) the Anti-Domestic Violence Law offers a notch for state powers to embrace the familial relationship and to safeguard a victim.
References
Anitha, Sundari. 2010. No recourse, no support: State policy and practice towards South Asian women facing domestic violence in the U.K. British Journal of Social Work 40(2). 462–479.10.1093/bjsw/bcn160Search in Google Scholar
Baker, Helen. 2013. The significance of shame in the lives of women who experience male violence. Liverpool Law Review 34. 145–171.10.1007/s10991-013-9134-zSearch in Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare. 1995. On crimes and punishments and other writings, R. Bellamy (edited), R. Davies & V. Cox (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802485Search in Google Scholar
Benson, Michael L., Greer L Fox, Alfred DeMaris & Judy van Wyk. 2003. Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress, and violence against women in intimate relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19(3). 207–235.10.1023/A:1024930208331Search in Google Scholar
Braden-Maguire, Jane, Janet Sigal & Carrol S Perrino. 2005. Battered women who kill: Variables affecting simulated jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Family Violence 20(6). 403–408.10.1007/s10896-005-7801-0Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Ai Wu. 2016. Understanding and application of judicial interpretations. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, Winnie Cheng & King Kui Sin. 2014. Revisiting legal terms: A semiotic perspective. Semiotica 202(1/4). 167–182.10.1515/sem-2014-0051Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, Shifeng. Ni, King Kui Sin & Winnie Cheng. 2012. A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China. Semiotica 190(1/4). 41–55.10.1515/sem-2012-0038Search in Google Scholar
Du, Qin. 2013. Consideration of trying cases concerning the decision/verdict of personal safety protection. Yingke Lawyer 17(3). 23–24.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar
Felson, Richard B., Steven F Messner, Anthony W Hoskin & Glenn Deane. 2002. Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the police. Criminology 40(3). 617–648.10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00968.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ghafournia, Nafiseh. 2011. Battered at home, played down in policy: Migrant women and domestic violence in Australia. Aggression & Violent Behavior 16. 207–213.10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.009Search in Google Scholar
Ghimire, Dirgha J., William G Axinn & Emily Smith-Greenaway. 2015. Impact of the spread of mass education on married women’s experience with domestic violence. Social Science Research 54. 319–331.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.004Search in Google Scholar
Hirschel, David, Eve Buzawa, April Pattavina & Don Faggiani. 2007. Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions? Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 98(1). 255–298.Search in Google Scholar
Holtzworth-Munroe, Amy, Jeffrey C Meehan, Katherine Herron, Uzma Rehman & Gregory L Stuart. 2001. Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart typology. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology 68(6). 1000–1019.10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.1000Search in Google Scholar
Hsieh, Kuo-hsing. 2012. The right to be free from domestic violence in Macau. Liverpool Law Review 33. 27–35.10.1007/s10991-012-9107-7Search in Google Scholar
Huang, Tsui-wen & Hsin-Cheng Liang. 2011. A study on the causal factors of district court mediation committee’s capacity to mediate domestic violence cases. Journal for Asian Domestic Violence and Sexual Offense 7(1). 79–104.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Richard R & Wendi Goodlin-Fahncke. 2015. Exploring the effect of arrest across a domestic batterer typology. Juvenile & Family Court Journal 66(1). 15–30.10.1111/jfcj.12024Search in Google Scholar
Leung, Lai-Ching. 2014. It’s a matter of trust: Policing domestic violence in Hong Kong. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 29(1). 82–101.10.1177/0886260513504645Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, Ruth. 2004. Making justice work: Effective legal interventions for domestic violence. British Journal of Criminology 44(2). 204–224.10.1093/bjc/44.2.204Search in Google Scholar
Li, Hong Tao. 2011. Challenges and prospect in intervening domestic violence in mainland China. Journal for Asian Domestic Violence and Sexual Offense 7(2). 45–54.Search in Google Scholar
Luo, Jie. 2012. Legislation of domestic violence and empirical studies. Chongqing: Southwest University of Political Science & Law dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
MacQueen, Sarah & Paul A Norris. 2014. Police awareness and involvement in cases of domestic and partner abuse. Policing & Society 26(1). 1–22.10.1080/10439463.2014.922084Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1973. Law and social change: The semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate field of study. Law & Society Review 7(4). 719–746.10.2307/3052967Search in Google Scholar
Myhill, Andy & Kelly Johnson. 2015. Police use of discretion in response to domestic violence. Criminology & Criminal Justice 28(7). 1254–1259.10.1177/1748895815590202Search in Google Scholar
Ni, Shifeng, Le Cheng & King Kui Sin. 2010. Who are chinese citizens? A legislative language inquiry. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 23(4). 475–494.10.1007/s11196-010-9167-8Search in Google Scholar
Pate, Anthony M & Edwin E Hamilton. 1992. Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade county spouse assault experiment. American Sociological Review 57(5). 691–697.10.2307/2095922Search in Google Scholar
Project Group of the 3rd Survey on the Status of Chinese Women. 2011. Executive report of the 3rd survey on the status of Chinese women. Collection of Women’s Studies 6. 5–15.Search in Google Scholar
Robbins, Kalyani. 1999. No-drop prosecution of domestic violence: Just good policy, or equal protection mandate? Stanford Law Review 52(1). 205–233.10.2307/1229461Search in Google Scholar
Ruiter, Dick W. P. 1998. Structuring legal institutions. Law & Philosophy 17(3). 215–232.10.2307/3504879Search in Google Scholar
Salazar, Laura F., Charlene K. Baker, Ann W Price & Kathleen Carlin. 2003. Moving beyond the individual: Examining the effects of domestic violence policies on social norms. American Journal of Community Psychology 32(3–4). 253–264.10.1023/B:AJCP.0000004746.31861.e7Search in Google Scholar
Schooten, Hanneke van. 2009. War as an institutional fact: Semiotics and institutional legal theory. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 22(3). 307–320.10.1007/s11196-009-9112-xSearch in Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., Douglas A. Smith, Janell D Schmidt & Dannis P. Rogan. 1992. Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review 57(5). 680–690.10.2307/2095921Search in Google Scholar
Suk, Jeannie. 2006. Criminal law comes home. Yale Law Journal 116(1). 2–70.10.2307/20455713Search in Google Scholar
Tonsing, Jenny C. 2015. Complexity of domestic violence in a south Asian context in Hong Kong: Cultural and structural impact. Social Work Education 34. 1–13.10.1080/02615479.2015.1090969Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Anne. 2010. Mapping legal semiotics. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 23. 77–82.10.1007/s11196-009-9132-6Search in Google Scholar
Watkins, Phillip. 2005. Police perspective: Discovering hidden truths in domestic violence intervention. Journal of Family Violence 20(1). 47–54.10.1007/s10896-005-1509-zSearch in Google Scholar
Wei, Ai Mei. 2010. The response to and the current state of domestic violence in criminal justice system. Journal for Asian Domestic Violence and Sexual Offense 6(1). 135–162.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Tractatus logico-philosophicus, D. F. Pears & B. F. McGuinness (trans.). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Wright, Emily M & Michael L Benson. 2011. Clarifying the effects of neighborhood context on violence “behind closed doors.”. Justice Quarterly 28. 775–798.10.1080/07418825.2010.533687Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, Honglin. 2012. Legislative synthesis and trend of the anti-domestic violence law. Law Science 2. 43–52.Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, Dong Wu & Xiao Yu Qi. 2011. Practices of intervening domestic violence in by multi-institutions in urban areas. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
