Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Benchmarking and Transparency: Incentives for the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With over 2 billion people lacking medicines for treatable diseases and 14 million people dying annually from infectious disease, there is undeniable need for increased access to medicines. There has been an increasing trend to benchmark the pharmaceutical industry on their corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance in access to medicines. Benchmarking creates a competitive inter-business environment and acts as incentive for improving CSR. This article investigates the corporate feedback discourses pharmaceutical companies make in response to criticisms from benchmarking reports. It determines whether these responses are part of a healthy process in increasing access to medicines or a barrier to improvement. A qualitative analysis on the feedback the industry provided was performed, and the responses seen in these statements were grouped by analysing the language used, the ideas portrayed and atti- tudes of the companies. Increasing transparency through benchmarking is a powerful tool which reveals the industry’s shortfalls to the public, affects the decisions of socially responsible investors, and is a risk to their financial bottom line. This article demonstrates the importance of benchmarking and transparency in creating inter-business competition and the translation of these responses to actual access to medicine practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benoit, W. L.: 1997, ‘Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication’, Public Relations Review 23(2), 177-186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, J.L. and D. E. Garrett: 1995, ‘The Effectiveness of Corporate Communicative Responses to Accusations of Unethical Behavior’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 875-892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., C. Brooks and S. Pavelin: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures, Financial Management 35(Autumn), 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, L. and J. M. Logsdon: 1996, ‘How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off’, Long Range Planning 29(4), 495-502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BusinessAssurance.com: 2008, ‘CEOs Plan to Increase CSR Investments by 25 Percent’, http://businessassurance.com/ceos-plan-to-increase-csr-investments-by-25-percent/.

  • Chang, L.B.: 2006, ‘Who’s in the Business of Saving Lives?’. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31(5): 461-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C.: 2005, ‘Thee Good Company’, The Economist, January 22, 3–4.

  • Dhanarajan, S.: 2005, ‘Managing ethical standards: when rhetoric meets reality’, Development in Practice 15(3), 529-538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, S.: 1999, ‘‘We have the facts’ – how business claims legitimacy in the environmental debate’, Environment and planning A 31, 1295-1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, D.: 2008, ‘Strengthening corporate social responsibility in the pharmaceutical industry’, Journal of Medical Marketing, 8(1), 77-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, W. and G. Whiteman: 2007, ‘“Aids is Not a Business”: A Study in Global Corporate Responsibility – Securing Access to Low-cost HIV Medications’, Journal of Business Ethics 73, 65-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, T.: 2001, ‘Relationships with NGOs Have Been Fundamental to Many Corporations’ Social Responsibility Programs’, Monday Developments 19(17).

  • Fox R. and J. Fox: 2004, ‘Organizational DiscourseA language-Ideology-Power Perspective’, Praeger, Westport, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankental, P.: 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility – a PR invention? Corporate Communications: An International Journal 6(1), 18-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, D.: 2008, ‘JUST Good Business’, The Economist

  • Friedman, M.: 1970, ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits’, The New York Times Magazine

  • Gruskin S., E. J. Mills and D. Tarantola: 2007, ‘History, Principles, and Practice of Health and Human Rights’, The Lancet 370(9585), 449–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsough, K., D. E. Rosan and L. Sachs: 2006, ‘Benchmarking AIDS: Evaluating Pharmaceutical Company Responses to the Public Health Crisis in Emerging Markets’, The Corporate Examiner 34(6–7).

  • Hemingway, C. A., and P.W. Maclagan: 2004, ‘‘Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 50, 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, T. J.: 2007, ‘Taboos in Corporate Social Responsibility Discourse’, Journal of Business Ethics 74, 165-175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, D.: 1986, ‘Quality Improvement Begins at the Top’, World 20(5).

  • Ketola, T.: 2008, ‘A Holistic Corporate Responsibility Model: Integrating Values, Discourses and Actions’, Journal of Business Ethics 80, 419-435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosla, R., P. Hunt: 2009, ‘Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in Relation to Access To Medicines – The Sexual and Reproductive Health Context’, Human Rights Centre, University of Essex, Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. and R. van Tulder: 2002, ‘International Codes of Conduct: Trends, Sectors, Issues and Effectiveness’, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambell, R., G. Ramia, C. Nyland, and M. Michelotti: 2008, ‘NGOs and international business research: Progress, prospects and problems’, International Journal of Management Reviews 10(1), 75-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K.M.: 2005, ‘The Corporate Social Responsibility of the Pharmaceutical Industry: Idealism Without Illusion and Realism Without Resignation’, Business Ethics Quarterly 15(4), 577-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. M.: 2007, ‘Corporate Philanthropy: The “Top of the Pyramid”‘, Business and Society Review 112(3), 315-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. M.: 2008, ‘Corporate Responsibilities for Access to Medicines’, Journal of Business Ethics Online, http://www.springerlink.com/content/01011u4800734242/fulltext.pdf.

  • Levy, D.L.: 1999, ‘Environmental Management as Political Sustainability’, Organization and Environment 10(2), 126-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maire, J.: 2002, ‘A Model of characterization of the performance for a process of benchmarking’, Benchmarking 9(5), 506-520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maire, J., V. Bronet, and M. Pillet: 2005, ‘A typology of “best practices” for a benchmarking process’, Benchmarking 12(1), 45-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez, A., C. J. Fombrun: 2005, ‘Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility’, Corporate Reputation Review 7(4), 304-308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, M.L.: 2001, ‘Policing Transnational Commerce: Global Awareness in the Margins of Morality’, Journal of Business Ethics 30: 17-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2000, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?’ Strategic Management Journal 21, 603-609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel: 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A theory of the Firm Perspective’, The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., D. S. Siegel and P.M. Wright: 2006, ‘“Guest Editors” Introduction – Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications’, Journal of Management Studies 43(1).

  • Menou, V., A. Hornstein, and E. Lipton-McCombie: 2008, ‘Access to Medicines Index – Ranking Access to Medicines Practices, Access to Medicines Foundation, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musungu, S. F.: 2006, ‘Benchmarking Progress in tackling the challenges of intellectual property, and access to medicines in developing countries’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization 84(5), 366-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam: Investing for Life: 2007, Meeting Poor People’s Needs for Access to Medicines Through Responsible Business Practices. Oxfam Briefing Paper No. 109, London, November 27, 2007.

  • Parker, M.: 2003, ‘Introduction: Ethics, Politics and Organizing’, Organization 10(2), 187-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharmaceutical Shareowners Group: 2004, ‘The Public Health Crisis in Emerging Markets: An Institutional Investor Perspective on the Implications of the Pharmaceutical Industry’, London: PSG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., M. R. Kramer: 2006, ‘Strategy and Society – The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 84(12), 78–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Renneboog, F., J. Ter Horst, and C. Zhang: 2008, ‘Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior’, Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1723-1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D.B.: 2001, ‘Developing drugs for the developing world: an economic, legal, moral, and political dilemma’, Developing World Bioethics 1(1), 11-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, N.: 2008, ‘The Challenge of Socially Responsible Investments’, The CPA Journal 78(7), 52-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Trend and a Movement, but of What and for What?’, Corporate Governance 6(5), 595–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M. A.: 2008, ‘Socially Responsible Investment and Pro-social Change’, Journal of Economic Issues 42(1), 51-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swajkowski E.: 1992, ‘Accounting for Organizational Misconduct’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 401-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, L., and J. Coughlan: 2008, ‘Do different industries report Corporate Social Responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory’, Journal of Marketing Communications 14(2), 113-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN: 2005, ‘Prescription for Healthy Development: Increasing Access to Medicines’, http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/TF5-medicines-Complete.pdf.

  • UN: 2007a, ‘Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies in Relation to Access to Medicines, Draft for Consultation’, Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health (19 September 2007).

  • UN Press Release: 2007b, ‘UN Independent Expert Launches Draft Human Rights Guidelines for Pharmaceutical Companies’ (19 September 2007), http://www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/497E81A16B31B9C8C125735B0059D7B0?opendocument.

  • Waddock, S., and S. Graves: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance – Financial Performance Link’, Strategic Management Journal 18(4), 303-319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: 1989, ‘Involving Nongovernmental Organizations in World Bank-Supported Activities’, World Bank Operational Manual, Operational Directive 14.70 dated August 28, 1989.

  • Zadek, S.: 2004, ‘The Path to Corporate Responsibility’, Harvard Business Review 82(12), 125–132.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, M., Kohler, J. Benchmarking and Transparency: Incentives for the Pharmaceutical Industry’s Corporate Social Responsibility. J Bus Ethics 95, 641–658 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0444-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0444-y

Keywords

Navigation