Notes
28 C.F.R. § 600.1.
Report on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, Volume I (hereafter referred to as “Volume I”), 14.
Volume I, 36.
Volume I, 7.
Volume I, 8.
Volume I, 8.
Report on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, Volume II (hereafter referred to as “Volume II”), 48.
Volume II, 48–51.
28 C.F.R. § 600.6.
Volume I, 13.
28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c).
Volume I, 13.
A sitting president’s amenability to indictment and criminal prosecution, 24 Op. O.L.C. 222, 223 (2000).
Volume II, 182.
Volume I, 14.
Volume I, 36.
Volume I, 67–68.
Volume I, 71.
Volume I, 66.
Volume I, 70–72. It is also worth noting that Michael Cohen eventually cooperated with the Special Counsel’s Office and has expressed disappointment that the Special Counsel was reluctant to comment further on his investigation on issues related to obstruction of justice and witness tampering. See, e.g., LeBlanc (2019).
Volume I, 76.
Volume I, 73.
Volume I, 146.
Volume I, 131.
Volume I, 78.
Volume I, 79.
Volume I, 86.
Volume I, 96.
Volume I, 111.
Volume I, 149.
See, e.g., Granovetter (1985).
See, e.g., Heath (2014).
See, e.g., Smith (2019).
Volume I, 157.
Volume I, 162.
Volume I, 162.
See, e.g., Williams (1973).
Volume I, 22.
Volume I, 25.
See, e.g., Johnson (2017).
References
Adams-Bloom, T., & Cleary, J. (2009). Staking a claim for social responsibility: An argument for the dual responsibility model. The International Journal on Media Management,11(1), 1–8.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,91(3), 481–510.
Heath, J. (2014). Morality, competition, and the firm: The market failures approach to business ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, B. G. (2017). Speech, harm, and the duties of digital intermediaries: Conceptualizing platform ethics. Journal of Media Ethics,32(1), 16–27.
Leblanc, P. (2019). Michael Cohen responds to Mueller testimony from prison: 'The American people deserve more! CNN.com, July 24. https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/24/politics/michael-cohen-mueller-testimony/index.html.
Nielsen, R. P. (2018). Ethical and legal First Amendment implications of FBI v. Apple: A commentary on Etzioni’s ‘Apple: Good business, poor citizen?’. Journal of Business Ethics,151(1), 17–28.
Painter-Morland, M., & Deslandes, G. (2017). Reconceptualizing CSR in the media industry as relational accountability. Journal of Business Ethics,143(4), 665–679.
Richards, I. (2004). Stakeholders versus shareholders: Journalism, business, and ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics,19(2), 119–129.
Sandoval, M. (2014). From corporate to social media: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in media and communication industries. New York: Routledge.
Smith, J. (2019). Navigating our way between market and state. Business Ethics Quarterly,29(1), 127–141.
Williams, B. (1973). Integrity. In J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against (pp. 108–117). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J. Review of The Mueller Report. J Bus Ethics 163, 167–172 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04357-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04357-8