Skip to main content
Log in

Bioethics in pluralistic societies

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary liberal democracies contain multiple cultural, religious, and philosophical traditions. Within these societies, different interpretive communities provide divergent models for understanding health, illness, and moral obligations. Bioethicists commonly draw upon models of moral reasoning that presume the existence of shared moral intuitions. Principlist bioethics, case-based models of moral deliberation, intuitionist frameworks, and cost-benefit analyses all emphasise the uniformity of moral reasoning. However, religious and cultural differences challenge assumptions about common modes of moral deliberation. Too often, bioethicists minimize or ignore the existence of multiple traditions of moral inquiry. Careful consideration of the presence of multiple horizons for moral deliberation generates challenging questions about the capacity of bioethicists to effectively resolve complex cases and social policy disputes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp, Tom L. and James F. Childress: 1989, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Dan W.: 1995, ‘Public Moral Discourse’, in: Ruth Ellen Bulger, Elizabeth Meyer Bobby and Harvey V. Fineberg (eds.), Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press), pp. 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, Daniel: 1990, ‘Religion and the Secularization of Bioethics’, Hastings Center Report July/August, 2–4.

  • Campbell, Courtney S.: 1990, ‘Religion and Moral Meaning in Bioethics’, Hastings Center Report July/August, 4–10.

  • Campbell, Courtney S.: 1992, ‘Religious Ethics and Active Euthanasia in a Pluralistic Society’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2(3), 253–277.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhardt, H. Tristram, Jr.: 1989, ‘Can Ethics Take Pluralism Seriously?’ Hastings Center Report September/October, 33–34.

  • Fadiman, Anne: 1998, The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fins, Joseph J.: 1994, ‘Encountering Diversity: Medical Ethics and Pluralism’, Journal of Religion and Health 33(1), 23–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, Stanley: 1989, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik: [1935] 1981, Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Fox, Renee C. and Judith P. Swazey: 1984, ‘Medical Morality is Not Bioethics — Medical Ethics in China and The United States’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27(3) Spring, 336–360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford: 1983, Local Knowledge: Futher Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. USA: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E.H.: 1969, Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, George: [1974] 1985, English-Speaking Justice. Toronto: Anansi.

  • Hauerwas, Stanley: 1981, A Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Social Ethic. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, James Davison: 1991, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. USA: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jecker, Nancy S., Joseph A. Carrese and Robert A. Pearlman: 1995, ‘Caring for Patients in Cross-Cultural Settings’, Hasting Center Report January–February, 6–14.

  • Jonsen, Albert R. and Stephen Toulmin: 1988, The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptchuk, Ted J. and David M. Eisenberg: 2001, ‘Varieties of Healing. 1: Medical Pluralism in the United States’, Annals of Internal Medicine 135, 189–195.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Arthur: 1995, Writings at the Margin: Discourse Between Anthropology and Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunstadter, Peter: 1980, ‘Medical Ethics in Cross-Cultural and Multi-Cultural Perspectives’, Social Science and Medicine 14B, 289–296.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will: 1993, ‘Moral Philosophy and Public Policy: The Case of NRTs’, Bioethics 7(1), 1–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lieban, Richard W.: 1990, ‘Medical Anthropology and The Comparative Study of Medical Ethic’, in: George Weisz (ed.), Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 221–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair: 1988, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Patricia A.: 1992, ‘Anthropology and Bioethics’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly 6(1), 49–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Patricia, David C. Thomasma and Jurrit Bergsma: 1994, ‘Intercultural Reasoning: The Challenge for International Bioethics’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3, 321–328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Vicki: 1994, ‘Factoring Ethnic and Racial Differences into Bioethics Decision Making’, Generations, 23–26.

  • Minogue, Brendan P.: 1990, ‘The Exclusion of Theology from Public Policy: The Case of Euthanasia’, Second Opinion 14, 85–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muir Gray, J.A.: 1999, ‘Postmodern Medicine’, The Lancet 354, 1550–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, Jessica H.: 1994, ‘Anthropology, Bioethics, and Medicine: A Provocative Trilogy’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly 8(4), 448–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Jing-Bao: 2000, ‘The Plurality of Chinese and American Medical Moralities: Toward an Interpretive Cross-Cultural Bioethics’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10(3), 239–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Callaghan, F.V.O. and N. Jordan: 2003, ‘Postmodern Values, Attitudes and the Use of Complementary Medicine’, Complementary Therapy in Medicine 11, 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, Richard A.: 1991, Thinking Through Cultures: Expeditions in Cultural Psychology. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, Jeffrey: 1988, Ethics After Babel: The Languages of Morals and Their Discontents. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen E.: 1987, ‘The National Commission on Human Experimentation: Procedures and Outcomes’, in: H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. and Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 599–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen: 1981, ‘The Tyranny of Principles’, The Hastings Center Report 11(6), 31–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wildes, Kevin Wm. S.J.: 1993, ‘The Priesthood of Bioethics and The Return of Casuistry’, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18, 33–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, L. Bioethics in pluralistic societies. Med Health Care Philos 7, 201–208 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000034330.44606.9c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MHEP.0000034330.44606.9c

Navigation