Skip to main content
Log in

Cultural Diversity and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the impact of a city’s cultural diversity on a firm’s tax avoidance (TA). Our findings suggest that when a firm is located in a culturally diverse city, it exhibits less TA than a firm located in a less culturally diverse city. The findings are robust to alternative metrics of cultural diversity and TA and after accounting for omitted sample bias and endogeneity. Additional analysis suggests that the negative impact of cultural diversity on a firm’s TA is more salient in a firm with strong managerial incentives or in a city that is characterized by more migration. Furthermore, we document that the negative impact of cultural diversity on TA is more pronounced when firms face strong financial constraints or effective internal and external monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The mean and median of BTD are different from those in Xia et al. (2017). We attribute the difference due to four reasons: (1) our sample is from 2007–2017 while theirs is from 2000–2014, (2) we use only non-SOEs and they include all firms, and (3) Xia et al. (2017) follow Kim et al. (2011) method while we use Manzo and Plesko (2002) method to calculate BTD.

  2. We compare the means and medians of the full sample and the reduced sample. The dependent variable (BTD) and explanatory variables (DIVERSITY1 and DIVERSITY2) do not exhibit significant differences between the full and reduced samples.

  3. The data for the mountainous terrain in and around a city (QFDU) are from Feng et al. (2007). In Feng et al., they use the geographical information system method to examine a 1 to 1 million mountainous terrain model. Based on a 10 km by 10 km window (a piece of land) and using 500 m as the standard height, they assign a value of n to the piece of land if a window has n times of 500 m.

References

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 847–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C., Blouin, J., Jagolinzer, A., & Larcker, D. (2015). Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., & Larcker, D. F. (2012). The incentives for tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1–2(53), 391–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartram, S. M., Brown, G., & Stulz, R. M. (2012). Why are US stocks more volatile? Journal of Finance, 64(4), 1329–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, N., & Giorcelli, M. (2019). Scientific education and innovation: From technical diplomas to university STEM degrees. NBER Working paper, No. 25928.

  • Bilicka, K. (2019). The effect of loss-offset provisions on the asymmetric behavior of corporate tax revenues in the business cycle. National Tax Journal, 72(1), 45–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, M., Liao, G., & Mark, S. (2019). Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major Shareholder. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2–3), 255–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, J., Lemmon, M., Pan, X., & Tian, G. (2018). Political promotion, CEO compensation, and their effect on firm performance. Manage, forthcoming.

  • Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. Q., Zhang, R. D., & Lee, J. (2013). A cross-culture empirical study of M-commerce privacy concerns. Journal of Internet Commerce, 12(4), 348–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. P., & Chu, C. C. (2005). Internal control versus external manipulation: A model of corporate income tax evasion. Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, A., Huang, H. H., Li, Y., & Stanfield, J. (2012). The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review, 87, 1493–1526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. H., Huang, Y., Li, Y., & Stanfield, G. (2013). The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review, 87(5), 1493–1526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J., & Murphy, R. (2004). The social irresponsibility of corporate tax avoidance: Taking CSR to the bottom line. Development, 47, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chyz, J., Leung, S. C., Li, O., & Rui, O. M. (2013). Labor unions and tax aggressiveness. Journal of Financial Economics, 2013(108), 675–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. Handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–195). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, J., Daniel, N., & Naveen, L. (2006). Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 431–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1), 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture, an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. R. (2014). The curious case of corporate tax avoidance: Is it social irresponsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, X., Jian, W., Du, Y., Feng, W., & Zeng, Q. (2014). Religion, the nature of ultimate owner, and corporate philanthropic giving: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 235–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., Marchica, M., & Mura, R. (2011). Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking. Review of Financial Studies, 24(11), 3601–3641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Z., Tang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2007). Correlation between topographic relief and population distribution. Journal of Geography, 10, 1073–1082. ((in Chinese)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, F. (2014). CEO after-tax compensation incentives and corporate tax avoidance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(4), 1077–1102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2007). Financial development, bank discrimination and trade credit. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(2), 513–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S. L., & Starks, L. T. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2), 275–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y. Y., Irene, H. C., & David, A. (2011). Cultural diversity in China: Dialect, job embeddedness, and turnover. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(2), 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., & Tucker, A. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 563–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, I., Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2017). Does social capital matter in corporate decisions? Evidence from corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(3), 629–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2007). Disagreement and the stock market. Journal of Economic Perpectives, 21, 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2001). Problem solving by heterogeneous agents. Journal of Economic Theory, 97(1), 123–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. A., Lobo, G. J., & Ryou, J. W. (2019). Financial market development and firm investment in tax avoidance: Evidence from credit default swap market. Journal of Banking and Finance, 107, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, J. L., Mescall, D., & Pittman, J. (2012). Do IRS audits deter corporate tax avoidance? Accounting Review, 87, 1603–1639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoseini, M., Safari, G. M., & Valiyan, H. (2019). Demographic characteristics of the board of directors’ structure and tax avoidance. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(2), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H. H., Lobo, G. J., Wang, C., & Xie, H. (2016). Customer concentration and corporate tax avoidance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 72, 184–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, K., Litov, L., & Young, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk taking. Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1679–1728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 169–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B. G., & Owen, J. (2013). Exploring tax evasion in the context of political uncertainty. Economic Systems, 37(2), 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, I. K., & Moser, W. J. (2012). Institutional shareholders’ investment horizons and tax avoidance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 35, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., & Jung, J. (2019). Cultural attributes and risk perception: The moderating role of different types of research and development. Journal of Risk Research, 22(2), 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, K. J., Isowsky, P., & Mescall, D. (2016). The role of auditors, non-auditors, and internal tax departments in corporate tax aggressiveness. Accounting Review, 91(1), 179–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovermann, J., & Velte, P. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance—A literature review. Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, 36, 100207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lameli, A., Nitsch, V., Südekum, J., & Wolf, N. (2015). Same same but different: Dialects and trade. German Economic Review, 16(3), 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, K., & Mills, L. F. (2015). CEO characteristics and corporate taxes. Review of Accounting Studies, 22(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D. (1998). Changing incentives of the Chinese bureaucracy. American Economic Review, 88(2), 393–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhou, L. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q. (1927). Chinese culture history, In Ice-drinking restaurant combined collected works (10) in Chinese. Shanghai: Publishing House of China. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, S. (2005). The substance of Chinese culture. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisowsky, P. (2010). Seeking shelter: Empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information. Accounting Review, 85, 1693–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, F., Wang, Y., & Zhan, W. (2020). Does TMT cultural diversity contribute to firm performance and do socialisation and tenure matter? A test of two competing perspectives. Personnel Review, 49, 324–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., & Yang, D. (2011). Commercial credit: Alternative financing or buyer’s market? Management World, 4, 6–14. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhang, W. (2012). Bank discrimination, holding bank ownership, and economic consequences: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(2), 341–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv, S. (2010). The history of Chinese culture. Beijing: Peking University Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, D. M., & Sanborn, R. H. (1988). Interactions between financial and tax accounting caused by the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Accounting Horizons, 2(4), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzon, J. G. B., & Plesko, G. A. (2002). The relation between financial and tax reporting measures of income. Tax Law Review, 55(3), 175–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S. T., Omer, T. C., & Wang, D. (2012). Tax avoidance: Does tax-specific industry expertise make a difference? Accounting Review, 87, 975–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L., Erickson, M., & Maydew, E. (1998). Investments in tax planning. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 20(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2006). The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from US Cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(1), 9–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., Xiao, J., & Dai, Y. (2017). Cultural diversity and enterprises’ innovation: A study based on the perspective of dialects. Journal of Financial Research, 10, 146–161. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parise, S., & Rollag, K. (2010). Emergent network structure and initial group performance: The moderating role of pre-existing relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 877–897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrino, R., Sias, R. W., & Starks, L. T. (2003). Voting with their feet: Institutional ownership changes around forced CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 68, 3–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Per, G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on Innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. D. (2003). Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. Accounting Review, 78(3), 847–874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1992). Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system. Harvard Business Review, 70(5), 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, E. A. (2000). Law and social norms. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, B., Yu, J., & Chan, K. C. (2020a). Does social trust restrain firm financing violations? Evidence from China. Accounting and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, B., Yu, J., & Zhang, K. (2020b). Trust and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(1), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego, S. (2003). Tax avoidance activities of U.S. multinational corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20, 805–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego, S. O., & Wilson, R. (2012). Equity risk incentives and corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, G., Wang, B., & Zhang, X. (2016). Ownership structure and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from publicly listed private firms in China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 12(2), 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. M., Grattan, L. M., Toben, A. C., Ausherman, C., Trainer, V. L., Tracy, K., & Morris, J. G. (2016). Perception of risk for domoic acid related health problems: A cross-cultural study. Harmful Algae, 57, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. (1995). Top management team consensus, heterogeneity and debate as contingent predictions of company performance: The complimentarily of group structure and process. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1, 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. G., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slemrod, J. (2004). The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal, 57(4), 877–899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, C. (1989). Rational turnout: The neglect role of groups. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 390–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L. (2015). Tax enforcement, corporate tax aggressiveness, and cash holdings. China Finance Review International, 5(4), 339–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Fan, G., & Hu, L. (2019). Marketization index of China’s Province: NERI report 2018. Beijing: Academic Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, C., Cao, C., & Chan, K. C. (2017). Social trust environment and firm tax avoidance: Evidence from China. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 42, 374–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, C., Zhang, X., Cao, C., & Xu, N. (2018). Independent director connectedness in China: An examination of the trade credit financing hypothesis. International Review of Economics and Finance, 63, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, X., Liu, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2015). Dialect and economic growth. China Journal of Economics, 2(2), 1–32. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, L., Luo, M., & Xia, D. (2010). Corporate Governance and bank loan financing. Accounting Research, 8, 55–61. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Soda, G. (2009). Network evolution: The origins of structural holes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., & You, R. (1984). Dialect and Chinese culture. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Nos. 71702102, 71472041].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junli Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Variable Definitions

This appendix presents the definitions of all variables.

Variable

Definition

BTD

BTD = ((pretax accounting profit − taxable income) / total assets) *100; taxable income = (income tax expense − deferred income tax expense) / nominal income tax rate

DIVERSITY1

The number of sub-Chinese dialects in one city

DIVERSITY2

The dialect differentiation index from Xu et al. (2015)

ROA

The ratio of net income to total assets in a given year

SIZE

The natural logarithm of total assets at the end of the year

LEV

Ratio of total liabilities to total assets at the end of the year

GROWTH

One-year percentage change in sales

TANGIBLE

The ratio of tangible assets to total assets at the end of the year

TOP

Percentage of shares held by the largest shareholder at the end of the year

AGE

The natural logarithm of one plus the number of listing years for a firm

DUAL

If the same individual is the CEO and chairman of the board, the value is 1 and zero otherwise

EQINC

The ratio of income from investment to total assets at the end of the year

INTANG

The ratio of intangible assets to total assets at the end of the year

LOSS

If a firm reports negative net earnings in previous year, the value is 1 and zero otherwise

PC

If any manager of a firm is a former or current government officials, deputies to the National People’s Congress, party representatives or PPCC members, then the value is 1 and zero otherwise

MARKET

Marketization index of a province from Wang et al. (2019)

UNCERTAINTY

It takes a value of 1 if the governor or communist party secretary changes in a province in which a firm located in a given year; and zero otherwise

Appendix B. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) Covariate Balance Checks

This appendix presents the results for the covariate balance checks of PSM. See Tables 14 and 15.

Table 14 The covariate balance checks of PSM (using two dialects as cut-off to be treatment group)
Table 15 The covariate balance checks of PSM (using three dialects as cut-off to be treatment group)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lei, G., Wang, W., Yu, J. et al. Cultural Diversity and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises. J Bus Ethics 176, 357–379 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04683-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04683-2

Keywords

Navigation