Abstract
Despite the antecedents of unethical sales behavior (USB) have been well studied, these literatures primarily focus on the work domain and neglect the spillover effects of the home domain. Drawing on ego depletion theory as an overarching theoretical framework, this research investigates why and how salespersons’ work-family conflict (WFC) at home triggers next day’s USB at work. This study used daily diary data collected from 99 salespeople in two weeks to test the proposed hypotheses. The multilevel path analysis indicates that evening’s WFC positively affects next afternoon’s USB via increased next morning’s ego depletion (ED). Furthermore, service climate was found to moderate this indirect relationship, such that the indirect relationship becomes weaker under high service climate. To the best of my knowledge, this study is one of the first to reveal that salespersons’ daily WFC may serve as a role conflict event and lead to next day’s USB at work, which provides a fine-grained understanding of spillover effects of daily WFC through a daily diary study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Unethical sales behavior (USB) refers to the behavior of salespeople intentionally or unintentionally concealing or omitting information related to customers (Maignan & Ferrell, 2004). USB among salespeople has been rampant due to the high level of competitive intensity of sales jobs (Cheng et al., 2014). Thus, salespeople would have likely resorted to unethical sales behavior to close a deal quickly (Wotruba, 1990). USB is typically considered to negatively and severely impair customers' perceptions of a firm's reputation and firm-directed behaviors (Lian et al., 2022), which is a common and serious concern for organizations. Existing literature on the antecedents of unethical behavior concentrates on individual moral traits, leader’s behaviors, and organizational culture/climate (e.g., Eisenbeiß & Brodbeck, 2014; Kish-Gephart et al., 2010; Lian et al., 2022). Nonetheless, do behaviors or events in the home domain exert an impact on employee unethical behavior? This gap in prior literature is important to address because my knowledge of how and why employees engage in USB due to family factors is incomplete.
Work-family conflict (WFC) is defined as the inter-role conflict caused by the incompatibility of role pressures in the two fields of work and family (Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985; Netemeyer et al., 1996). Given the boundary-spanning and stressful nature of sales job, salespeople are more vulnerable to experience work-family conflict than other employees due to volatile schedule and frequent overtime (Bande et al., 2019; Miao & Wang, 2017). Furthermore, employees have to bring their work to home or even work from home because of COVID-19 pandemic (Shao et al., 2021), and the boundary between work and family becomes blurred or even disappeared. Thus, how to inhibit the negative effects of WFC during COVID-19 pandemic is a particularly serious problem (Antino et al., 2022). Spillover effect indicates that employees' behaviors at work and at home would influence each other. If an individual is disappointed with one system, he/she will take actions in the other system to make up for it, thus resulting in negative contagion between the work domain and the home domain (Cho & Kim, 2022; Karapinar et al., 2020). Therefore, WFC not only affects the employees’ home domain (e.g., spouse’s discontent, Krannitz et al., 2015), but also further spills over into the work domain. For instance, literature indicates that WFC negatively affects employee's in-role behavior, extra-role behavior, and unethical behavior (Lan et al., 2021; Miao & Wang, 2017). Accordingly, the research issues of this paper are: after a night's sleep, whether and how WFC can still affect next day’s USB? If so, how to inhibit this negative effect (i.e., intervention mechanism)?
To address the above questions, the present study draws upon ego depletion theory (EDT) to investigate whether and how WFC predicts USB of the next day, and ego depletion is adopted as the underlying mechanism. Ego depletion (ED) refers to the depleted state of individual’s self-control ability after conducting some activities that require the investment of self-control resources (Hagger et al., 2010). Meanwhile, WFC, as a role conflict event, requires employees to invest a lot of self-control resources in the process of WFC. Ethical behavior requires a certain amount of self-control resources to comply with, and unethical behavior is likely to occur when people's self-control resources are at a low level (Lussier et al., 2021; Yam, 2018). In a similar vein, salespeople who have experienced WFC are more likely to fall into the state of ego depletion, and their self-interested motivation will be activated because of the decreased self-control ability, so as to achieve sales performance through conducting unethical behaviors. Thus, the present study predicted that salesperson’s WFC would induce USB the next day through increased ED.
Furthermore, this study contends that service climate may be a crucial moderator. Service climate functions as important information cues, which informs employees about what will be rewarded, supported, and expected of them in delivering customer service (Bowen & Schneider, 2014; Lam et al., 2010). This study theorizes that service climate would weaken the positive relationship between ED and USB. Specifically, when in a team with a positive service climate, the code of conduct requires salespeople to protect the interests of customers. At the same time, the organization with a high service climate will provide signals of supportive and compensatory resources for the salespeople, such as assistance in removing obstacles to service delivery, material or motivational rewards, and work empowerment. Thus, even in a depleted state, they are less likely to actively engage in unethical sales behavior because of sales quota pressure. The conceptual model is depicted in Fig. 1.
The current work makes threefold contributions. First, this study linked WFC to USB through a daily dairy study, and deepened the understanding of the lagged effects of daily WFC. Furthermore, extant literature on the antecedents of USB mainly concentrates on workplace factors, such as leader’s behaviors and traits, work pressure, organizational culture/climate (see a review, Kish-Gephart et al., 2010), whereas factors in family domain are relatively scarce. To the best of my knowledge, the present study is one of the first to reveal that salespersons’ WFC may serve as a role conflict event and positively relate to next day’s USB at work, which provides a fine-grained understanding of spillover effects of WFC through a daily diary study. Second, this study investigates the underlying mechanism of daily WFC on next day’s USB through the perspective of ED, which enriches the literature on ED. More recently, some scholars have called for exploring the antecedents of ED from family factors, such as lack of sleep, smartphone use, and unhealthy eating (Chen & Hou, 2021; Lanaj et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2021). In fact, the effect of WFC on ED is more critical and direct than these factor, yet less academic attention. Investigating the adverse spillover effects of daily WFC on ED not only echoes Miao and Wang’s (2017) notion, but also provides stronger causal support for the findings of Lan et al. (2021). Finally, this paper contributes to the literature on EDT and climate research by identifying service climate as a cross-level moderator. The literature on ED calls for attention to the positive organizational factors that can weaken the effect of ED, such as job autonomy, material or motivational rewards (Bell & DeWall, 2019; Muraven et al., 2007). The present study echoes literature on EDT and enriches the intervention mechanism of ED effect in the context of sales management.
Theory and Hypotheses
Daily Work-family Conflict and Daily Ego Depletion
As a specific form of inter-role conflict, WFC occurs when individuals' work role requirements interfere with their ability to satisfy family role requirements. Studies indicated that the competing demands of two separate but personally important areas of life—work and family—are likely to lead to a variety of negative consequences, such as increased work stress, dissatisfaction and subsequent withdrawal, and decreased organizational commitment and performance (Allen et al., 2020; Cheng et al., 2021). In addition, WFC is also considered to be one of the most crucial factors leading to spouses' depression, low marital well-being, and high divorce rates among salesperson (Blair-Loy et al., 2015; Krannitz et al., 2015). More recently, some scholars have found that family factors have spillover effects on employees' work state and performance (Cho & Kim, 2022). Likewise, Wang et al. (2021) found that WFC causes employees’ emotional exhaustion, which in turn harms job performance.
Ego depletion is defined as the state in which the self-control resource is depleted when the individual needs self-control resources to perform volitional activities in a certain period of time (Hagger et al., 2010). Self-control relies strongly on self-control resources; the more such resources are available, the more likely it is to succeed in self-control execution (Baumeister et al., 2007; Hagger et al., 2010). Extant literatures primarily explore the antecedents of employee ego depletion from the perspective of individual and organizational, such as sleep amount, work pressure, emotional labor, and abusive supervision (e.g., Barnes et al., 2015; Lanaj et al., 2014; Lyddy et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2020). More recently, Lan et al. (2021) found that work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict have direct and positive effects on HSR drivers’ ego depletion and indirect effects on both safety compliance and safety participation via ego depletion.
EDT posits that when individuals need to alter their own responses, such as controlling emotional display, obeying rules, and suppressing immediate desires, their self-control resources are rapidly consumed (Baumeister et al., 2007). Therefore, the present study reasonably argues that if employees experience a high level of work-family conflict at home, they will have a hard time recovering from ego depletion the next day. First, WFC requires individuals to spend a lot of resources to control themselves after busy work, which will further aggravate the ego depletion level of salespeople. Thus, when individuals experience high WFC, stress may impair their ability to engage effectively in work behaviors because they have fewer resources at their disposal in the work domain. In addition, after experiencing high WFC, salespeople may not be able to fully replenish self-control resources through a night's sleep, despite studies showing that sleep can effectively supplement self-control resources (Barnes et al., 2015). On the other side, WFC also affects family members and disrupts family interaction patterns (Miao & Wang, 2017), leading to their negative emotions. Such negative emotions could carry over to the next day's work, impairing the next day's self-control behavior. In sum, the present study proposes that WFC positively influences ego depletion by increasing the consumption of self-control resources and inducing negative emotions.
Hypothesis 1 (H1)
Daily WFC in the evening is positively associated with next morning’s ED.
Daily Ego Depletion as a Mediator
According to EDT, individuals have limited resources to regulate and control their own behaviors, and the depletion of resources often makes individuals unable to concentrate their willpower, thus leading to negative behaviors (Hagger et al., 2010). Inzlicht et al. (2006) proposed that individuals value reward and satisfaction-related cues when in the state of ego depletion. That is, the initial act of control leads people to engage less in further self-control and more motivated to perform those activities that are self-interested or energy-free. Furthermore, extant studies have shown that ego depletion leads to a range of negative outcomes, such as disruptive voice behaviors, unsafe behaviors, and unethical behaviors (Lussier et al., 2021; Mackey et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2020). For instance, Liu and Yu (2021) indicated that morning’s ego depletion could impair the focus and effort needed for the day's work, thus employees who experience depletion in the morning should experience less job dedication during the workday.
EDT states that all self-control activities depend on the same resources (Hagger et al., 2010), thus the self-control resources consumed by WFC will harm subsequent self-control behaviors (e.g., ethical sales behaviors). Ethical sales behaviors are the embodiment of moral standards, especially deplete self-control resource, and require great effort to control (Lussier et al., 2021). As a result, depleted individuals are less willing to invest extra effort to behave ethically, may even reduce effort, in order to maintain the few self-control resources (Lin et al., 2016). Furthermore, literature in behavioral ethics has shown that there is a positive correlation between ED and unethical decision-making (e.g., Kouchaki & Smith, 2014; Lussier et al., 2021). When salesperson’s self-control resources are depleted (a state called "ego depletion"), they will succumb to temptations and pursue self-serving goals (Baumeister et al., 1998; Gino et al., 2011). This is because compliance with ethical norms requires self-control, and ignoring these norms provides a shortcut to higher profits or productivity (Lin et al., 2021). Likewise, Mantel (2005) showed that salespeople in positive states are twice as likely to make ethical choices as those in neutral states. Therefore, this study theorizes that depleted salespeople may inflict harm to customers (e.g., lying to customers) in order to achieve desired results (e.g., meeting sales quota), which is a dysfunctional behavior of conserving resources in a depleted state. That is, salespeople under a state of ED may hold that these unethical behaviors, including dishonesty, manipulation, and deception, are likely to produce short-term rewards or immediate pleasure (Wang et al., 2017). Taken together, this study proposed the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 2 (H2)
Daily ED in the morning is positively associated with daily USB in the afternoon.
Hypothesis 3 (H3)
Salespeople’s daily WFC in the evening has a positive indirect effect on daily USB at work the next day via daily ED in the next morning.
The Moderating Role of Service Climate
Climate is the ambience around employees that provides cues, norms, and expectations, which rationalizes their work behavior (Lam et al., 2010). This means that climate plays a crucial role in promoting appropriate work behavior even when employees are emotionally exhausted, and it also has the power to suppress signals of external interference (Naveh & Katz-Navon, 2015; Salancik & Pfeffer, 1978). On this basis, service climate is defined as “employees’ shared sense of the service quality—focused policies, practices and procedures they experience and the service quality emphasis they observe in behaviors that are rewarded, supported, and expected” (Bowen & Schneider, 2014, p.5). Employees follow the display rules expected by the service climate in order to obtain organization-specific rewards or avoid punishment (Schneider et al., 2013). In an organization with a strong service climate, employees are more likely to identify with the values of the organization, treat customers in accordance with the requirements of the organization, and feel the support of the organization in service contact. A positive and strong service climate can lead to better service performance (Walumbwa et al., 2019), organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment (Hong et al., 2013), work engagement (Kang & Busser, 2018), business performance (Jiang et al., 2016), and more positive emotions (Lam et al., 2010) and less negative emotions towards customers (Jerger & Wirtz, 2017). In addition, service climate is also found to exist a positive impact on customer experiences, such as service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty (see a review, Bowen & Schneider, 2014).
As a social context, service climate not only restrains salesperson's negative work behavior through code of conduct, but also provides them with a signal of availability of supportive and compensatory resources (Lam et al., 2010), thus weakening the negative consequences of ego depletion. This research therefore asserts that service climate weakens the positive relationship between ED and USB. From an internal perspective, organizations with a positive service climate will empower salespeople to enhance their work autonomy and motivation (Qiu et al., 2021), thus strengthening their willpower to resist the negative consequences of ED. In addition, the organization will also provide material or motivational rewards to compensate their consumed resources and motivate them to provide superior service to their customers. From an external perspective, service climate, as a behavioral signal, requires salespeople to perform in accordance with organizational goals and behavioral norms (Bowen & Schneider, 2014; Lin et al., 2021). Accordingly, a positive service climate can help employees internalize service quality norms (Liao et al., 2009) and create a strong moral constraint. Salespeople, even when suffering from ED, still strive to adhere to the service-centered orientation and avoid the behavior that harms the interests of customers. In addition, by identifying and internalizing a shared perception of providing quality service, employees generate an internal motivational force (Grandey et al., 2012; Liao et al., 2009) to overcome their feelings of depletion. To conclude, hypothesis 4 was therefore proposed:
Hypothesis 4 (H4)
Service climate moderates the positive relationship between daily ED and daily USB, such that the relationship is weaker when service climate is high.
Combining H3-4, this research proposes a moderated mediation model that service climate alleviates the negative spillover effect of WFC on USB of next day through morning ED. Specifically, a positive service climate can motivate salespeople to internalize a service-oriented organizational norm (Liao et al., 2009), thus allowing them to overcome their sense of ego depletion. In other words, a positive service climate is more likely to buffer the relationship between WFC and USB through increased ED. In contrast, in a less positive service climate, salespeople lack clear organizational goals, norms, and motivational force (Bowen & Schneider, 2014) to promote and guide their sales behavior. As a result, salespeople who experience high WFC produce high ED, which in turn is more likely to engage in short-sighted and unethical behavior.
Hypothesis 5 (H5)
Service climate moderates the indirect relationship between daily WFC and daily USB via daily ego depletion, such that the indirect relationship becomes weaker when service climate is high.
Method
Sample and Design
This study employed a daily dairy study to observe in real time whether the increase of evening’s WFC in Day t will cause changes in the levels of ED and USB of Day t + 1. Daily dairy study is also a commonly used measurement approach in ED literature (e.g., Wehrt et al., 2020), which can reduce the evaluation bias and investigate the intra-individual variation for more accurate longitudinal study (Dimotakis et al., 2011; Li et al., 2021).
Prior to the data collection, the authors recruited 135 salespeople through the research platform credamo to participate in this study. The credamo is a large online crowdsourcing platform that ensures high-quality data through selecting participants based on demographics and excluding those who have provided low-quality responses in the past (Zhou et al., 2022). This research method through the online crowd-sourcing platform can invite salespeople from different industries and firms to attend this study, thus helping to increase the external validity of findings (Chen et al., 2021).
Considering the work nature of salespeople, this survey was conducted in the online questionnaire system, which was divided into two phases. All participants completed a survey on demographics and perceived service climate in the first phase, and the second phase questionnaire was distributed in the second week. The second phase of the survey lasted 2 weeks (10 working days), which included morning, afternoon, and evening questionnaires. Specifically, this study distributed questionnaires to the 135 participants to complete the questionnaire through WeChat (the largest social app in China). Following daily dairy study and ED literature (e.g., Cho & Kim, 2022), the morning survey (7:00 –10:00 a.m.) assessed their ED, the early afternoon survey (1:00–3:00 p.m.) assessed their USB that day, and WFC was assessed as a predictor in evening survey (6:00–10:00 p.m.). As a financial incentive to participate in the study, salesperson who completed each day’s surveys received 20 CNY (Chinese Yuan), equal to 3.1 USD (United States Dollar). Salesperson who completed full 10-day surveys received 200 CNY, equal to 31 USD. During the second phase, a total of 808 valid daily surveys (i.e., surveys containing complete data from all three assessment points) out of a potential 1350 reporting days (135 participants × 10 days; 59.9%) were received.
After matching available data from Day t (i.e., Monday through Thursday within each week) and Day t + 1 (i.e., Tuesday through Friday within each week), this study obtained 561 complete 2-day observations from 99 salespeople out of possible 792 observations (99 participants × 8-day lags observations after restructuring data; 70.8%). In this final sample (N = 99, 61.6% = female), 52.6% are between 26 and 35 years old, 56.6% obtained bachelor or higher degree, their annual income mainly range from 50, 000 to 200, 000 CNY (76.8%), 72.8% of them have beyond 3 years of job tenure, and 56.6% of them work in an organization with 100–500 employees.
Measures
All measures in this study were employed from previous studies. Following Brislin's (1986) translation/retranslation procedures, this study set up a team including two professors, a doctoral student and two master students in business school to translate the scale into Chinese to ensure the accuracy of the content. Constructs were assessed using seven-point Likert scale (see Appendix; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree).
Work-Family Conflict (Evening)
Salespeople reported their level of work-family conflict in evening survey using a 5-item scale developed by Netemeyer et al. (1996). A sample item is "The demands of my work interfere with my home and family life".
Ego Depletion (Next Morning)
Ego depletion was measured in the morning survey. A five-item scale developed by Twenge et al. (2004) and applied by Johnson et al. (2014) and Lanaj et al. (2014), was adopted to measure ego depletion. Sample items include "My mind feels unfocused right now" and “Right now, it would take a lot of effort for me to concentrate on something”.
Unethical Sales Behavior (Next Afternoon)
Salespeople evaluate their unethical sales behavior that day in early afternoon survey using a 5-item scale developed by Román (2003). A sample item includes "In today’s work, I often lie about availability in order to make a sale".
Service Climate (Between-Person Measure)
This study used a seven-item developed by Bowen and Schneider (2014) to measure participants’ perceived service climate in their organization. Sample items include "How would you rate the job knowledge and skills of employees in your business to deliver superior quality service?" and "How would you rate the recognition and rewards employees receive for the delivery of superior service?".
Control Variables
Salespersons' gender, age, education level, annual income, job tenure, and firm size were controlled.
Analytic Strategy
This study employed multilevel path analyses for the data had a nested structure (multiple days nested within salespeople). In addition to data reconstruction (i.e., matching Day t’s WFC with Day t + 1’s ED and USB), this study group-mean centered the within-person (Level 1) predictors (i.e., WFC and ED) on each person's average score to eliminate between-person variance, thus ensuring that the within-person results were not confused by individual differences (Ilies et al., 2007). The between-person moderator (i.e., service climate) and demographic variables were centered on the grand mean and modeled as a person-level variable, thereby cross-level moderation estimates will strictly represent between-person differences (Cho & Kim, 2022). In the analysis, this study specified the level 1 fixed effect of the previous night's WFC on the mediator (i.e., next morning’s ego depletion) and the random effect of the mediator on the outcome variable (i.e., next afternoon’s USB). The analysis constructed a multilevel path model that includes both within- and between-level variables to estimate all the path coefficients simultaneously with a Bayesian estimation method. The Bayesian method is superior to conventional testing as it enables more direct interpretation of results based on observed data and accurately estimates more complex models (Hu et al., 2020; Zyphur & Oswald, 2015).
Variance partitioning results showed that the intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC (1), of daily WFC, ED, and USB were 0.807, 0.704, and 0.803, respectively. These results indicated that intra-individual fluctuations explain a significant amount of the variances in the variables and lend support to the need for multilevel modeling (Scott & Barnes, 2011). Therefore, the multilevel-modeling approach was appropriate to test the proposed hypotheses via Monte Carlo bootstrapping simulation procedures using an open-source software RStudio. The RStudio’s MplusAutomation package leverages the flexibility of the R language to automate latent variable model estimation and interpretation using Mplus, so many scholars use software RStudio to analyze data (e.g., Cho & Kim, 2022; Loi et al., 2022).
Results
Preliminary Analysis
To assess the fit of the measurement model, a series of multilevel confirmation factor analyses (MCFA) were performed. Results showed that this four-factor MCFA model fit the data well (χ2 = 395.396, df = 101, CFI = 0.951, TLI = 0.939, RMSEA = 0.072, SRMRwithin = 0.052, SRMRbetween = 0.028). Consequently, the results provided construct validity evidence of the four latent constructs in this study. Moreover, Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics, inter-correlations, and reliabilities of all variables. The results indicate that there is acceptable discriminative validity among these variables.
Test of Hypotheses
This study presents the multilevel path analysis results in Fig. 2. As predicted, daily WFC was positively associated with their next morning’s ED (γ = 0.294, p < 0.01) and daily ED positively related to afternoon’s USB (γ = 0.286, p < 0.01), while the main effect of daily WFC on USB was non-significant (γ = 0.129, p > 0.05). Therefore, the results provided empirical support for H1 and H2. Monte Carlo simulation procedure indicated that the indirect effect of daily WFC and next day’s USB via next morning’s ED was significant (γ = 0.084, S.E. = 0.034, 95% CI: [0.018, 0.15]), supporting H3.
H4 predicted that service climate moderates the relationship between daily ED and USB (γ = −0.147, p < 0.05). The study plotted this moderating effect at the conditional values of service climate (1SD above and below the mean) in Fig. 3. As expected, the relationship between ED and USB was weaker when service climate was high (γ = 0.152, p > 0.05) than low service climate (γ = 0.42, p < 0.01).
H5 predicted that service climate moderates the indirect relationship between daily WFC in the evening and next day’s USB at work via daily ED in the next morning. The index of moderated mediation was −0.079, 95%CI: [−0.113, −0.045]. Specifically, when service climate was low, the indirect effect was significant (γ = 0.123, S.E. = 0.041, 95%CI = [0.043, 0.204]), whereas that was not significant when service climate was high (γ = 0.045, S.E. = 0.026, 95%CI = [−0.006, 0.096]). Overall, results provided empirical support for H5.
General Discussion
Drawing upon EDT, the current study investigated the spillover effect of daily evening’s WFC on next afternoon’s USB via increased next morning’s ED. Specifically, salespeople’s daily WFC positively associated with next morning’s ED, which in turn positively influences afternoon’s USB, and service climate moderates the relationship between daily ED and daily USB. Below, this paper further discusses the theoretical contributions, practical implications of this study and the future research direction.
Theoretical Contributions
The present study offers several theoretical contributions for the current pool of knowledge. First, this study linked WFC to USB through a daily dairy study, and deepened the understanding of the lagged effects of WFC. The existing WFC literature primarily concentrates on the antecedents, yet relatively lack of attention to the consequences, such as job dissatisfaction, withdrawal behaviors, and decreased organizational commitment and performance (Allen et al., 2020; Cheng et al., 2021). Nonetheless, to my knowledge, little scholars have investigated the relationship between WFC and USB (Miao & Wang, 2017). Notably, in the context of sales management, USB should not be ignored and will do indelible damage to the organization's reputation and reduce opportunities for new and repeat business (Lian et al., 2022).
In addition, previous literature on the antecedents of USB primarily focuses on workplace factors, such as leader’s behaviors and traits, work pressure, organizational culture/climate (e.g., Kish-Gephart et al., 2010), whereas family factors are relatively scarce. More recently, some scholars have begun to explore the relationship between family factors and workplace behaviors, such as unhealthy eating (Cho & Kim, 2022) and work-family conflict (Lan et al., 2021). To the best of my knowledge, this study is one of the first to reveal that salespersons’ WFC at home may serve as a potential non-work stressor and relate to next day’s increased USB at work. Thus, the present study makes a unique contribution to the WFC and USB literature by providing a fine-grained understanding of WFC-USB link through a daily diary study.
Second, this study investigates the underlying mechanism of daily WFC on next day’s USB through the perspective of ED, which enriches the literature on ED. Extant literature on ED antecedents mainly concentrate on work or organizational factors, such as workplace temptation, emotional labor, and abusive supervision (Gino et al., 2011; Lyddy et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2020). More recently, some scholars have called for exploring the antecedents of ED from family factors, such as lack of sleep, smartphone use, unhealthy eating, and availability norms during non-work hours (Chen & Hou, 2021; Lanaj et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). In fact, the effect of WFC on ED is more critical and direct than these factors, yet less academic attention. Until recently, Lan et al. (2021) used a cross-sectional data and found that WFC has a direct and positive effect on high-speed railway (HSR) drivers’ ED, thus impairing safety performance. Through a daily diary study to capture the dynamic change of the critical variables, this research reconfirms and provides stronger causal support for the findings of Lan et al. (2021) in the context of sales management. Moreover, Miao and Wang (2017) explained the relationship between salespeople’s WFC and unethical behavior through work stress, and they encouraged future studies to explore other possible mediators to explain the relationship between WFC and unethical behavior. This research also echoes Miao and Wang’s (2017) notion and enriches the underlying mechanism of the relationship between WFC and USB.
Finally, the present study contributes to EDT and climate research by identifying service climate as a moderator. The extant literature of ED-USB link mainly explores boundary conditions from leadership and individual traits (Mackey et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2020). Unfortunately, the situational factor of organizational climate (e.g., service climate) has been neglected in these literatures (Rahaman et al., 2022). The literature on ED calls for attention to the positive factors at the organizational level that can weaken the effect of ED, such as job autonomy, material or motivational rewards (Bell & DeWall, 2019; Muraven et al., 2007). For instance, rewards can improve the motivation level of depleted individuals, thus strengthening their willpower to resist depletion and actively mobilize more remaining resource to complete tasks (Jimura et al., 2013). Accordingly, this research proposed and provided empirical evidence that service climate mitigates the negative consequences of ED effects by strengthening work motivation and codes of conduct. Taken together, this paper echoes literature on EDT and enriches the intervention mechanism of ED effect in the context of sales management.
Managerial Implications
These findings also provide important new insights into the managerial practices of sales departments. First of all, this paper suggests that organizations should fully understand the negative spillover effects of daily WFC. The findings indicate that salespeople’s WFC at home of Day t positively influences next morning’s ED, which in turn positively related to afternoon’s USB. Organizations need to value work-family management for salespeople, such as providing guidance on managing work-family boundaries and helping salespeople balance work and family to achieve work-family enhancement. Especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, employees are more likely to experience work-family conflict due to sudden and significant changes in work and family roles (Vaziri et al., 2020). Therefore, organizations can also provide some other measures to weaken morning’s ED, such as flextime and nap (Allen et al., 2013), which can enable employees to obtain more adequate rest.
Additionally, the findings underscore the importance of creating a strong and positive service climate for the sales force while pursuing sales performance. Service climate plays an unavoidable and profound role in individual cognition and behavior in the service industry (Lin et al., 2021). The findings indicated the motivational forces induced by a positive climate seem to enable employees to remain resilient to the potentially adverse impacts of WFC and ED. This study encourages organizations to establish a customer-centric service climate so that salespeople do not behave unethically towards customers because of the increased ED. In the short term, such unethical behavior helps to achieve sales quotas, but is devastating to corporate reputation in the long term (Lussier et al., 2021). Furthermore, the organizations could encourage ethical behavior, create an implicit ethics institutionalization (Tseng, 2019), and teach salespeople to recognize "good ethics pays" and "bad ethics costs" (Lynn, 2021). For example, organizations could consider reporting ethical employees and their stories to set examples while imposing severe penalties for unethical behavior.
Limitations and Future Research
Some limitations of this research merit discussion, which could provide fruitful avenues for future research. First of all, this paper measured all constructs at multiple time points to obtain data with high ecological validity via a daily dairy study (Dimotakis et al., 2011; Li et al., 2021). Nevertheless, all studied variables were completed by salespeople, which may not be objective enough. This research encourages future research to use the multi-source data to provide more robust support for the hypothesized relationships between variables, such as USB rated by sales managers or customers (Lussier et al., 2021; Miao & Wang, 2017). Moreover, employing different response methods can reduce the common method bias to a certain extent (Podsakoff et al., 2003).
Secondly, this study proposes and provides empirical support for the mediating role of ego depletion between salesperson’s daily WFC and unethical behavior. However, there may be alternative underlying mechanisms, such as work stress (Miao & Wang, 2017), negative emotion (Shi et al., 2021), moral disengagement (Jin et al., 2022), and work alienation (Fedi et al., 2016). For example, Jin et al. (2022) found that employees with high work-family conflict would have a higher tendency to engage in counterproductive work behavior due to higher moral disengagement. Thus, future research could consider to test alternative mediators from other potential theoretical perspectives.
Finally, this work does not assess if people believe unethical sales behavior is instrumental, and also not their specific motivation to control themselves regarding this. For instance, Zhang et al. (2022) revealed that the negative outcomes of ED would be stronger for employees who believed that willpower was a limited resource. These limitations are worth further consideration. Moreover, studies have indicated that organizational institutions, leadership, salesperson's traits and motivation may also affect ED-USB link (Lussier et al., 2021; Mackey et al., 2020; Tseng, 2019). Therefore, future research can consider looking for potential moderating factors from the level of organization, sales manager, and salespeople to mitigate salespeople’s responses to the perception of being depleted.
Data Availability
The datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2020). A cross-national meta-analytic examination of predictors and outcomes associated with work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 539–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000442
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
Antino, M., Ruiz-Zorrilla, P., Sanz-Vergel, A., Maria Leon-Perez, J., & Rodriguez-Munoz, A. (2022). The role of job insecurity and work-family conflict on mental health evolution during COVID-19 lockdown. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(5), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2049251
Barnes, C. M., Lucianetti, L., Bhave, D. P., & Christian, M. S. (2015). “You wouldn’t like me when i’m sleepy”: Leaders’ sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1419–1437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1063
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
Bell, S. B., & DeWall, C. N. (2019). Pressing the rewarding button: The relationship between impulsivity, fatigue, and reward sensitivity. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.01.004
Blair-Loy, M., Hochschild, A., Pugh, A. J., Williams, J. C., & Hartmann, H. (2015). Stability and transformation in gender, work, and family: Insights from the second shift for the next quarter century. Community, Work & Family, 18(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1080664
Bowen, D. E., & Schneider, B. (2014). A service climate synthesis and future research agenda. Journal of Service Research, 17(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670513491633
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). SAGE Publications.
Chen, C., Qin, X., Yam, K. C., & Wang, H. (2021). Empathy or schadenfreude? Exploring observers’ differential responses to abusive supervision. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 1077–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09721-4
Chen, Z., & Hou, L. (2021). An actor-partner interdependence model of work challenge stressors and work-family outcomes: The moderating roles of dual-career couples’ stress mindsets. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(6), 1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09724-1
Cheng, C.-Y., Hsieh, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-S. (2014). Who would engage in unethical behavior? Should organizations bear the responsibility? Quality & Quantity, 48(4), 2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9895-4
Cheng, D., Chan, X. W., Amarnani, R. K., & Farivar, F. (2021). Finding humor in work–life conflict: Distinguishing the effects of individual and co-worker humor. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, 103538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103538
Cho, S., & Kim, S. (2022). Does a healthy lifestyle matter? A daily diary study of unhealthy eating at home and behavioral outcomes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000890
Dimotakis, N., Scott, B., & Koopman, J. (2011). An experience sampling investigation of workplace interactions, affective states, and employee well-being. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.722
Eisenbeiß, S. A., & Brodbeck, F. (2014). Ethical and unethical leadership: A cross-cultural and cross-sectoral analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(2), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1740-0
Fedi, A., Pucci, L., Tartaglia, S., & Rollero, C. (2016). Correlates of work-alienation and positive job attitudes in high- and low-status workers. Career Development International, 21(7), 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2016-0027
Geldhof, G. J., Preacher, K. J., & Zyphur, M. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032138
Gino, F., Schweitzer, M. E., Mead, N. L., & Ariely, D. (2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.001
Grandey, A., Foo, S. C., Groth, M., & Goodwin, R. E. (2012). Free to be you and me: A climate of authenticity alleviates burnout from emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025102
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486
Hong, Y., Liao, H., Hu, J., & Jiang, K. (2013). Missing link in the service profit chain: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 237–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031666
Hu, J., He, W., & Zhou, K. (2020). The mind, the heart, and the leader in times of crisis: How and when COVID-19-triggered mortality salience relates to state anxiety, job engagement, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(11), 1218–1233. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000620
Ilies, R., Schwind, K. M., & Heller, D. (2007). Employee well-being: A multilevel model linking work and nonwork domains. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701363712
Inzlicht, M., McKay, L., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stigma as ego depletion—How being the target of prejudice affects self-control. Psychological Science, 17(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01695.x
Jerger, C., & Wirtz, J. (2017). Service employee responses to angry customer complaints: The roles of customer status and service climate. Journal of Service Research, 20(4), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517728339
Jiang, K., Hu, J., Hong, Y., Liao, H., & Liu, S. (2016). Do it well and do it right: The impact of service climate and ethical climate on business performance and the boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1553. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000138
Jimura, K., Chushak, M. S., & Braver, T. S. (2013). Impulsivity and self-control during intertemporal decision making linked to the neural dynamics of reward value representation. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(1), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0919-12.2013
Jin, S., Zhu, X., Fu, X., & Wang, J. (2022). Family supportive leadership and counterproductive work behavior: The roles of work-family conflict, moral disengagement and personal life attribution. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906877
Johnson, R. E., Lanaj, K., & Barnes, C. M. (2014). The good and bad of being fair: Effects of procedural and interpersonal justice behaviors on regulatory resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035647
Kang, H. J., & Busser, J. A. (2018). Impact of service climate and psychological capital on employee engagement: The role of organizational hierarchy. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.03.003
Karapinar, P. B., Camgoz, S. M., & Ekmekci, O. T. (2020). Employee wellbeing, workaholism, work-family conflict and instrumental spousal support: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(7), 2451–2471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00191-x
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103
Kouchaki, M., & Smith, I. H. (2014). The morning morality effect: The influence of time of day on unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 25(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613498099
Krannitz, M. A., Grandey, A. A., Liu, S., & Almeida, D. A. (2015). Workplace surface acting and marital partner discontent: Anxiety and exhaustion spillover mechanisms. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(3), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038763
Lam, C. K., Huang, X., & Janssen, O. (2010). Contextualizing emotional exhaustion and positive emotional display: The signaling effects of supervisors’ emotional exhaustion and service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017869
Lan, Y., Zhang, X., Deng, H., Yang, Z., & Xia, Y. (2021). How work-family conflict predict HSR drivers safety performance? Empirical evidence from China. Chinese Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-12-2020-0527
Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Barnes, C. M. (2014). Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.01.001
Li, Y., Kleshinski, C. E., Wilson, K. S., & Zhang, K. (2021). Age differences in affective responses to inclusion experience: A daily diary study. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12484
Lian, H., Huai, M., Farh, J.-L., Huang, J.-C., Lee, C., & Chao, M. M. (2022). Leader unethical pro-organizational behavior and employee unethical conduct: Social learning of moral disengagement as a behavioral principle. Journal of Management, 48(2), 350–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320959699
Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D. P., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high-performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013504
Lin, M., Ling, Q., Liu, Y., & Hu, R. (2021). The effects of service climate and internal service quality on frontline hotel employees’ service-oriented behaviors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 97, 102995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102995
Lin, S.-H., Ma, J., & Johnson, R. E. (2016). When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: How ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(6), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000098
Liu, X., & Yu, K. (2021). When pursuing more career, success hits home and job: Examining the cost of vocational delay of gratification. Career Development International, 26(6), 806–823. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2020-0204
Loi, T. I., Feng, Z., Kuhn, K. M., & Tripp, T. M. (2022). When and how underdog expectations promote cheating behavior: The roles of need fulfillment and general self-efficacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(2), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04976-0
Lussier, B., Hartmann, N. N., & Bolander, W. (2021). Curbing the undesirable effects of emotional exhaustion on ethical behaviors and performance: A salesperson-manager dyadic approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(4), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04271-z
Lyddy, C. J., Good, D. J., Bolino, M. C., Thompson, P. S., & Stephens, J. P. (2021). The costs of mindfulness at work: The moderating role of mindfulness in surface acting, self-control depletion, and performance outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(12), 1921–1938. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000863
Lynn, A. (2021). Why “doing well by doing good” went wrong: getting beyond “good ethics pays” claims in managerial thinking. Academy of Management Review, 46(3), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0250
Mackey, J. D., Huang, L., & He, W. (2020). You abuse and I criticize: An ego depletion and leader-member exchange examination of abusive supervision and destructive voice. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4024-x
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303258971
Mantel, S. P. (2005). Choice or perception: How affect influences ethical choices among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.2005.10749046
Miao, C. F., & Wang, G. (2017). Effects of work-family interface conflicts on salesperson behaviors: A double-edged sword. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 762–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0492-7
Muraven, M., Rosman, H., & Gagné, M. (2007). Lack of autonomy and self-control: Performance contingent rewards lead to greater depletion. Motivation and Emotion, 31(4), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-007-9073-x
Naveh, E., & Katz-Navon, T. (2015). A longitudinal study of an intervention to improve road safety climate: Climate as an organizational boundary spanner. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037613
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Qiu, H., Wang, N., & Li, M. (2021). Stimulating customer citizenship behavior with service climate: The mediating role of customer psychological empowerment. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211006065
Rahaman, H. M. S., Stouten, J., Decoster, S., & Camps, J. (2022). Antecedents of employee thriving at work: The roles of formalization, ethical leadership, and interpersonal justice. Applied Psychology, 71(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12308
Román, S. (2003). The impact of ethical sales behavior on customer satisfaction, trust and loyalty to the company: An empirical study in the financial services industry. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(9–10), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2003.9728245
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809
Scott, B., & Barnes, C. (2011). A multilevel field investigation of emotional labor, affect, work withdrawal, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.59215086
Shao, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, M., Chang, C.-H., & Wang, L. (2021). Making daily decisions to work from home or to work in the office: The impacts of daily work- and COVID-related stressors on next-day work location. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(6), 825–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000929
Shi, W., Wang, F., & Li, X. (2021). Depletion effect of work-leisure conflict: A daily diary study. Social Indicators Research, 158(1), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02710-x
Tseng, L.-M. (2019). How implicit ethics institutionalization affects ethical selling intention: The case of Taiwan’s life insurance salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(3), 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3723-z
Twenge, J., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2004). Measuring state self-control: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego State University
Vaziri, H., Casper, W. J., Wayne, J. H., & Matthews, R. A. (2020). Changes to the work-family interface during the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining predictors and implications using latent transition analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(10), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000819
Walumbwa, F. O., Hsu, I.-C., Wu, C., Misati, E., & Christensen-Salem, A. (2019). Employee service performance and collective turnover: Examining the influence of initiating structure leadership, service climate and meaningfulness. Human Relations, 72(7), 1131–1153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718790649
Wang, I.-A., Tsai, H.-Y., Lee, M.-H., & Ko, R.-C. (2021). The effect of work-family conflict on emotional exhaustion and job performance among service workers: The cross-level moderating effects of organizational reward and caring. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(14), 3112–3133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1651373
Wang, Y., Wang, G., Chen, Q., & Li, L. (2017). Depletion, moral identity, and unethical behavior: Why people behave unethically after self-control exertion. Consciousness and Cognition, 56, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.09.007
Wehrt, W., Casper, A., & Sonnentag, S. (2020). Beyond depletion: Daily self-control motivation as an explanation of self-control failure at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(9), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2484
Wotruba, T. R. (1990). A comprehensive framework for the analysis of ethical behavior, with a focus on sales organizations. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 10(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.1990.10753821
Yam, K. C. (2018). The effects of thought suppression on ethical decision making: Mental rebound versus ego depletion. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2944-2
Yuan, X., Xu, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). Resource depletion perspective on the link between abusive supervision and safety behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(1), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3983-2
Zhang, N., Shi, Y., Ma, H., & Zhang, H. (2022). Is it up to you? The moderating role of beliefs about willpower in the relationship between availability norms and control over leisure time via ego depletion. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 136, 103742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103742
Zhou, Y., Fei, Z., He, Y., & Yang, Z. (2022). How human-chatbot interaction impairs charitable giving: The role of moral judgment. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05045-w
Zyphur, M. J., & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Bayesian estimation and inference: A user’s guide. Journal of Management, 41(2), 390–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313501200
Acknowledgements
The author is particularly grateful to Dr. Wan-nok Wong and three anonymous reviewers for their guidance in the analysis.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers: 72072187).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article contains a study with human participants. All of the procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the APA ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Measurement of the Key Variables in the Study.
Service climate (Bowen & Schneider, 2014; 1 = very poor, 7 = outstanding).
-
1.
How would you rate the job knowledge and skills of employees in your business to deliver superior quality service?
-
2.
How would you rate efforts to measure and track the quality of service in your business?
-
3.
How would you rate the recognition and rewards employees receive for the delivery of superior service?
-
4.
How would you rate the overall quality of service provided by your business?
-
5.
How would you rate the leadership shown by management in your business in supporting the service quality effort?
-
6.
How would you rate the effectiveness of our communications efforts to both employees and customers?
-
7.
How would you rate the tools, technology, and other resources provided to employees to support the delivery of superior quality service?
Daily work-family conflict (Netemeyer et al., 1996; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree).
-
1.
The demands of my today’s work interfere with my home and family life.
-
2.
Today, the amount of time my job takes up makes it difficult to fulfill family responsibilities.
-
3.
Things I want to do at home do not get done because of the demands my today’s job puts on me.
-
4.
Today, my job produces strain that makes it difficult to fulfill family duties.
-
5.
Due to work-related duties, I have to make changes to my today’s plans for family activities.
Daily ego depletion (Twenge et al., 2004; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree).
-
1.
Now, I feel drained.
-
2.
My mind feels unfocused right now.
-
3.
Right now, it would take a lot of effort for me to concentrate on something.
-
4.
Now, my mental energy is running low.
-
5.
Now, I feel like my willpower is gone.
Daily unethical sales behavior (Román, 2003; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree).
-
1.
In today’s work, I usually lie about availability in order to make a sale.
-
2.
In today’s work, I usually lie about competition in order to make a sale.
-
3.
In today’s work, I give answers when I don’t really know the answers.
-
4.
In today’s work, I apply sales pressure, even though I know that the product is not right for the customer.
-
5.
In today’s work, I paint rosy pictures of the products to make them sound as good as possible.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lei, S. Shedding Light on the Adverse Spillover Effects of Work-Family Conflict on Unethical Sales Behaviors at Work: A Daily Diary Study. J Bus Ethics 190, 399–411 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05423-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05423-y