Skip to main content

Epistemic Logic

  • Chapter
Handbook of Epistemology

Abstract

The core meaning of the Greek word episteme is knowledge. Thus, taken literally, epistemic logic represents the logic of knowledge. In modern philosophy, however, epistemic logic is used as a technical term not only for the logic of knowledge but also for the logic of belief, (although the latter might more appropriately be referred to as doxastic logic from the Greek doxa to mean belief).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beckermann, A.: 1997, `Wissen und wahre Meinung’, in W. Lenzen (ed.), Das weite Spektrum der Analytischen Philosophie, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boh, I.: 1986, `Elements of epistemic logic in later Middle Ages’, in L’Homme et son Univers au Moyen Age — Philosophes Médiévaux 27, 530–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1947, Meaning and Necessity,University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.M.: 1963, `The logic of knowing’, in Journal of Philosophy 60, 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagin, R., J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses and M. Y. Vardi: 1994, Reasoning about Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K.: 1974, `An ascending chain of S4-logics’, in Theoria 40, 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finetti, B. de: 1964, `Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources’, in H.E. Kyburg and H.E. Smokier (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, R.E. Krieger, Huntington, N.Y., pp. 53–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1988, Knowledge in Flux: Modelling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1961, `Modality and Quantification’, in Theoria 27, 119–128; revised version reprinted in J. Hintikka, Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1969, `Semantics for propositional attitudes’, in J. W. Davis et al. (eds.), Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 21–45; reprinted in J. Hintikka, Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 87–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1970a, `Surface information and depth information’, in J. Hintikka and P. Suppes (eds.), Information and Inference, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 263–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1970b, The Semantics of Modal Notions and the Indeterminacy of Ontology’, in Synthese 21, 408–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: 1975, `Quine on Quantifying in: A Dialogue’, in J. Hintikka, The Intentions of Intentionality and other New Models for Modalities, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 102–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, M.O.: 1972, `Is epistemic logic possible?’, in Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13, 433–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1969, `Quantifying In’, in Synthese 19, 178–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1959, `A completeness theorem in modal logic’, in Journal of Symbolic Logic 24, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, `Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 253–355 + 763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F.v.: 1976, Einführung in die intensionale Semantik,de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera, F.v.: 1982, Grundfragen der Erkenntnistheorie,de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, E.J.: 1977, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W.: 1976, `Die Paradoxie der überraschenden Übung: Logische, epistemologische und pragmatische Aspekte’, in Logique et Analyse 19, 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W.: 1978, Recent Work in Epistemic Logic, North Holland Publ. Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W.: 1979, ‘Epistemologische Betrachtungen zu [S4, S5]’ in Erkenntnis 14 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W.: 1980a, Glauben, Wissen und Wahrscheinlichkeit, Springer Verlag, Vienna.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W.: 1980b, Wittgensteins Zweifel über Wissen und Gewißheit’, in Grazer Philosophische Studien 10, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, W.: 1995, `On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic attitudes’, in A. Laux and H. Wansing (eds.), Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1968, `Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, in Journal of Philosophy 65, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, U.: 1998, Glaube und Notwendigkeit, Schiiningh Verlag, Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O.: 1956, `Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, in Journal of Philosophy 53, 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartwell, C.: 1991, `Knowledge is merely true belief, in American Philosophical Quarterly 28, 157–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerberg, K.: 1971, `Qualitative probability in a modal setting’, in J. Fenstad (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd Scandinavian Logic Symposium, North Holland Publ. Company, Amsterdam, pp. 341–352.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1962, Über Gewißheit, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lenzen, W. (2004). Epistemic Logic. In: Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., Woleński, J. (eds) Handbook of Epistemology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-6969-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-1986-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics