Abstract
This paper objects to treating begging the question as circular reasoning. It argues that what is at issue in the argument is not to be confused with the claim or position that the arguer is adopting, and that logicians from Aristotle on give the wrong definition and have difficulty making sense of the fallacy because they try to define it in terms of how an argument is defined by logical theory - as a sequence consisting of premises followed by a conclusion. That the problematic about begging the question depends on treating an argument as a context-less sequence of statements seems to be anticipated by the pragma-dialectical approach. The paper offers a critique of this dialogical approach, as exemplified by Douglas Walton in his recent book on begging the question, on the grounds that it raises more problems than it solves. It concludes with the suggestion that what is really at issue in discussions of begging the question is the need for a theory of fallacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, John: 1976, ‘The Fallacy of Begging the Question,’Dialogue 15, 241–55.
Biro, John: 1977, ‘Rescuing “Begging the Question”,’Metaphilosophy 8, 257–71.
DeMorgan, Augustus: 1847,Formal Logic, Taylor and Walton, London, 254.
Hamblin, C. L.: 1970,Fallacies, Methuen & Company, London.
Hintikka, Jaako: 1987, ‘The Fallacy of Fallacies,’Argumentation 1, 211–38.
Hoffman, Robert: 1971, ‘On Begging the Question at any Time,’Analysis 32, 51.
Mackenzie, J. D.: 1984, ‘Begging the Question in Dialogue,’Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 174–81.
Robinson, Richard: 1971, ‘Begging the Question 1971,’Analysis 32, 113–17.
Sanford David: 1972, ‘Begging the Question,’ Analysis32, 197–9.
Van Eemeren, Frans and Rob Grootendorst: 1987, ‘Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective,’Argumentation 1, 283–301.
Van Eemeren, Frans, Rob Grootendorst and Tjark Kruiger: 1987,Handbook of Argumentation Theory, Foris Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.
Walton, Douglas: 1991,Begging the Question, Greenwood Press, New York.
Walton, Douglas: 1987,Informal Fallacies, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Woods, John and Douglas Walton: 1975, ‘Petitio Principii,’Synthese,31, 107–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levi, D.S. Begging what is at issue in the argument. Argumentation 8, 265–282 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711193
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711193