Skip to main content
Log in

Excusing Responsibility for the Inevitable

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is by now well established that the fact that an action or aconsequence was inevitable does not excuse the agent from responsibilityfor it, so long as the counterfactual intervention which ensures thatthe act will take place is not actualized. However, in this paper I demonstrate that there is one exception to this principle: when theagent is aware of the counterfactual intervener and the role she wouldplay in some alternative scenario, she might be excused, despite the fact that in the actual scenario she acts, as we say, of her own freewill. I illustrate this contention by way of a critique of Fischer andRavizza's well-known account of responsibility for consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, N. Excusing Responsibility for the Inevitable. Philosophical Studies 111, 43–52 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021269912443

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021269912443

Keywords

Navigation