Abstract
Molyneux's Question, that is, “Suppose a man born blind, and now adult, and taught by his touch to distinguish between a cube and a sphere... and the blind man made to see: Quaere, whether by his sight, before he touched them, he could now distinguish, and tell, which is the globe, which the cube”, was discussed by many theorists in the 17th and 18th centuries, and has recently been addressed by contemporary philosophers interested in the nature, and identity conditions, of perceptual concepts. My main concern in this paper is to argue – against Evans, Campbell, and a number of other contemporary philosophers – that a test of the sort Molyneux envisioned, at least if carefully designed and administered, can indeed be a crucial experiment for the claim that we deploy the same perceptual concepts when identifying shapes by sight and by touch. I will explore some implications of this argument for a theory of recognitional concepts. And I’ll try to trace out some unhappy consequences of various alternative views.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkeley, G. (1709/1965): Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision, in Armstrong, Berkeley’s Philosophical Writings. Macmillan, 1965
Campbell, J. (1996): “Molineux’s Question”, in E. Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing
Campbell J. (2005). Information-Processing, Phenomenal Consciousness and Molyneux’s Question. In: Bermudez, José (eds) Thought, Reference and Experience: Themes from the Philosophy of Gareth Evans, pp. Oxford University Press, forthcoming, Oxford
Dretske F. (1995). Naturalizing the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Evans G. (1985). Molyneux’s Question, in Evans, Collected Papers. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Leibniz G.W. (1765/1982). New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge
Livingston, K.R., Andrews J.K. and Harnad, S. (1998): ‘Categorical Perception Effects Induced by Category Learning’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 24(3), 732–753
Loar B. (1996). Comments on John Campbell, “Molineux’s Question. In: Villanueva, E. (eds) Perception, pp. Ridgeview Publishing, Atascadero, CA
Ludwig K. (1996). Shape Properties and Perception. In: Villanueva, E. (eds) Perception, pp. Ridgeview Publishing, Atascadero, CA
Lycan W. (1996). Layered Perceptual Representation. In: Villanueva, E. (eds) Philosophical Issues 7, pp. Ridgeview Press, Atascadero
Macdonald, C. (2004): ‘Mary Meets Molyneux: The Explanatory Gap and the Individuation of Phenomenal Concepts’. NOUS 38:2
Martin, M. (1992): ‘Sight and Touch’, in T. Crane (ed.), The Contents of Experience, Cambridge University Press
Meltzoff, A. (1993): ‘Molyneux’s Babies’, in N. Eilan, R. McCarthy and B. Brewer (eds.), Spatial Representation: Problems in Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 219–235)
Pitcher, G. (1977): Berkeley, Boston: RKP
Printz J. (2002). Furnishing the Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Rozemond and Yaffe (2004): ‘Peachtrees, Gravity and God: Mechanism in Locke’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12(3), 387–342
Thomson, J.J. (1974): ‘Molyneux’s Question’, Journal of Philosophy 71
Tye M. (2000). Consciousness, Color and Content. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levin, J. Molyneux’s question and the individuation of perceptual concepts. Philos Stud 139, 1–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9072-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-007-9072-5