Skip to main content
Log in

Realisms

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is argued that the general thesis of realism is ill-defined, as are various versions of its denial. Only specific theses of the form ‘There areK's’ make clear sense. It is also argued that various efforts to deny realism always turn out to deny specific existential theses. Thus, it is argued, van Fraassen and Schwartz deny the existence of electrons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levin, M. Realisms. Synthese 85, 115–138 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873197

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873197

Keywords

Navigation