Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blair, J. A. 1998. The limits of the dialogue model of argument. Argumentation 12 (3): 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpowitz, C. F., and J. Mansbridge. 2005. Disagreement and consensus: the need for dynamic updating in public deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation 1 (1, Article 2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krabbe, E. C. W. 2006. Logic and games. In Considering pragma-dialectics, eds. P. Houtlosser, and M. A. van Rees, 185–198. Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • van Eemeren, F. H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. N. 1998. The new dialectic: conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Communication Department, University of Colorado, 80309, Boulder, CO, USA

    Marcin Lewiński, Mark Aakhus & Karen Tracy

Authors
  1. Marcin Lewiński
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark Aakhus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karen Tracy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Tracy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There were no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewiński, M., Aakhus, M. & Tracy, K. Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp. Argumentation 37, 493–495 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09619-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09619-4

Search

Navigation