Abstract
In this essay, I argue that the work of Giorgio Agamben provides us with a theory of studious play which cuts across many of the categories that polarize educational thought. Rather than either ritualized testing or constructivist playfulness, Agamben provides a model of what he refers to as studious play—a practice which suspends the logic of both ritual and play. In order to explore this notion of studious play, I first articulate Agamben’s fleeting remarks on the topic with an important problematic found in his early, literary work: transmission. If ritual transmits cultural traditions to ensure continuity with the past, and play as constructivist invention makes such transmission impossible, then studious play transmits transmissibility itself as a pure potentiality. Studious play accomplishes this peculiar educational task by suspending without destroying traditional things: laws, signs, and so on. I end the essay with a consideration of the ontological status of suspended things, arguing that they are transformed into toys via the action of study. Finally, I give a literary example of studious play found in Robert Walser’s novel Jakob von Gunten in which the school itself is imagined to be a kind of toy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agamben, G. (1993a). The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, G. (1993b). Stanzas: Word and phantasm in western culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, G. (1995). Idea of prose. New York: SUNY Press.
Agamben, G. (1999). The man without content. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2007a). Infancy and history: Essay on the destruction of experience. London: Verso.
Agamben, G. (2007b). Profanations. London: Zone Books.
Chmelynski, C. (2006). Play teaches what testing can’t touch: Humanity. Educational Digest: Essential Readings, 72(3), 10–13.
De la Durantaye, L. (2008). Homo profanus: Giorgio Agamben’s profane philosophy. Boundary, 2(35), 27–62.
Dinger, D., & Johnson, J. (2011). Let them play: An early learning (un)curriculum. St Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
Faulkner, J. (2010). Innocence, evil, and human frailty: Potentiality and the child in the writings of Giorgio Agamben. Angelaki: The Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 15(2), 203–219.
Heidegger, M. (2008). Being and time. New York: HarperPerennial.
Illich, I. (1970). Deschooling society. New York: Marion Boyars Publishers.
Lauer, L. (2011). Play deprivation: Is it happening in your school? EBSCO online submission. http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED524739.
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2007). The architecture of the learning environment: A ‘school’ without a ‘soul’? OASE: Journal for Architecture, 72, 6–13.
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2010). Schools as architecture for newcomers and strangers: The perfect school as public school? Teachers College Record, 112(10), 533–555.
Mills, C. (2009). The philosophy of Giorgio Agamben. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.
Neill, A. S. (1992). Summerhill school: A new view of childhood. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.
Olfman, S. (Ed.). (2003). All work and no play: How educational reforms are harming our preschooolers. Westport: Praeger.
Walser, R. (1999). Jakob von Gunten. New York: New York Review of Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lewis, T.E. Education as Free Use: Giorgio Agamben on Studious Play, Toys, and the Inoperative Schoolhouse. Stud Philos Educ 33, 201–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9365-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9365-4