Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Education and the Immunization Paradigm

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I chart the origins of modern day “biopedagogy” through an analysis of two historically specific figures of abnormality: the nervous child and the degenerate. These two figures form the positive (hygienic) and negative (eugenic) surfaces of biopolitics in education, sustained and articulated through the category of immunization. By analyzing the relation between the medical discourse of immunity and the practice of pedagogy, I will reveal how biopedagogy is predicated on a dialectical reversal of life into death and thus unsustainable for furthering social democracy. In conclusion, I begin to search for an affirmative notion of biopolitical education that is no longer predicated on the dialectics of immunization. For help in this project, I briefly suggest that a theory of natality helps to disentangle the promise of life from its negation in the form of educational eugenics and mental hygiene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, G. (1999). Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (2006). Between past and future. New York: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averill, L. (1928). The hygiene of instruction. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, D. (1997). Through the looking glass: Women and borderline personality disorder. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, J. (1986). Learning disability: Social class and the construction of inequality in American education. New York: Greewood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1999). Challenging orthodoxies. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. (1998). Racialized punishment and prison abolition. In J. James (Ed.), The Angela Davis reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, R. (2008). Bios: Biopolitics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, L. (1998). What is it impossible to think? A genealogy of the educated subject. In D. Carlson & M. Apple (Eds.), Power/knowledge/pedagogy. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). History of sexuality: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The birth of the clinic: An archeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003a). Abnormal. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2003b). Society must be defended. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. New York: Palgrave McMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, A. (2005). Social choreography: Ideology as performance in dance and everyday movement. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S., & Doris, J. (1979). Educational handicap, public policy, and social history: A broadened perspective on mental retardation. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S. (1999). Inheriting shame: The story of eugenics and racism in America. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. (1914). The hygiene of the school child. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. (1916). The measurement of intelligence. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, R. (1997). Genetic pathology model of deficit thinking. In R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyson E. Lewis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, T.E. Education and the Immunization Paradigm. Stud Philos Educ 28, 485–498 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9140-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-009-9140-8

Keywords

Navigation