Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Death with dignity from the Confucian perspective

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Death with dignity is a significant issue in modern bioethics. In modern healthcare, the wide use of new technologies at the end of life has caused heated debate on how to protect human dignity. The key point of contention lies in the different understandings of human dignity and the dignity of death. Human dignity has never been a clear concept in Western ethical explorations, and the dignity of death has given rise to more confusions. Although there is no such term as “dignity” in Confucian ethics, there are discussions of a number of ideas related to human dignity and the dignity of death. Therefore, Confucian bioethics can offer a new perspective for understanding the theoretical difficulties associated with the dignity of death and new methods for solving them. In this article, we attempt to reconstruct Confucian views on human dignity and the dignity of death and, based on those views, to analyze the following issues: the relationship between the dignity of death and biological life, the relationship between the dignity of death and suffering, the relationship between the dignity of death and the autonomy of human beings, and the relationship between the dignity of death and social justice. This article will also compare the Confucian views on these issues with the views of Western philosophers. Confucian ethics can offer distinct answers to the above issues and help resolve some confusions concerning concepts and theories in Western research on the dignity of death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Confucius. 2014. The book of filial piety and the book of rites. Trans. Hu Shengping and Chen Meilan. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.

  2. Confucius. 2013. The book of rites [Liji]. Trans. and ed. Dai Sheng. Harbin: The Northern Literature and Art Press.

  3. Liezi. 2015. Liezi. Trans. Jing Zhong. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.

  4. Mencius. 2015. Mencius. Trans. Wan Lihua and Lan Xu. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.

  5. Xun Zi. 2015. Xunzi. Trans. An Xiaolan. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.

  6. Confucius. 2015. Analects. Trans. Zhang Yanying. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.

  7. Sulmasy, Daniel P. 2008. Dignity and bioethics: History, theory, and selected applications. In Human dignity and bioethics: Essays commissioned by the President’s Council on Bioethics, ed. Adam Schulman, 469–501. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen-Almagor, Raphael. 1995. Autonomy, life as an intrinsic value, and the right to die in dignity. Science and Engineering Ethics 1(3): 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Munson, Ronald. 2008. Intervention and reflection: Basic issues in medical ethics. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hardwig, John. 1997. Is there a duty to die? Hastings Center Report 27(2): 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson, H.L. 1996. Death with Kantian dignity. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 7(3): 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Velleman, David. 1999. A right of self-termination? Ethics 109(3): 606–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wei, Hua. 2012. The root of traditional culture: Four dimensions in the confucian view on death. Academic World 11: 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Bai. 1977. The complete works of Taibai Li. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lo, Ping-cheung. 2010. Euthanasia and assisted suicide from confucian moral perspectives. Dao 9(1): 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pullman, Daryl. 2002. Human dignity and the ethics and aesthetics of pain and suffering. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23(1): 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. American Medical Association. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. 1996. Code of medical ethics: Current opinion with annotations. 1996–1997 Edition. Chicago: American Medical Association.

  18. Sima, Qian. 1959. A letter for Ren An. In Classical Chinese Literature [GuWen GuanZhi], vol. 1, ed. Wu Chucai and Wu Diaoho, 216–228. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen-Almagor, Raphael. 2002. The Chabot case: Analysis and account of Dutch perspectives. Medical Law International 5(3): 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, Simiao. 1990. Virtue of the great physician (DaYiJingCheng). In Medical ethics in ancient China, ed. Zhimin Wang, 95–105. Tianjin: Tianjin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maklin, Ruth. 2003. Dignity is a useless concept. British Medical Journal 327: 1419–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harris, John. 2015. Euthanasia and the value of life. In Euthanasia examined, ed. John Keown, 6–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dworkin, RonaldM. 1993. Life’s dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fan, Ruiping. 2010. Reconstructionist Confucianism. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Lo, Ping-cheung. 1999. Confucian views on suicide and their implications for euthanasia. In Confucian bioethics, ed. Ruiping Fan, 624–641. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to two anonymous reviewers of this journal for their good suggestions. We also thank the National Foundation of Social Science of China for funding support for this research. We also thank Marcus Düwell for inviting us to take part in the joint research project Human Dignity in the Context of Bioethics—China and the West. This China Exchange Programme is jointly organized by the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) and the Ministry of Education of China. Marcus Düwell and Jianhui Li are the leaders of the project on the Netherlands and Chinese sides, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhui Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Li, J. Death with dignity from the Confucian perspective. Theor Med Bioeth 38, 63–81 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9383-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9383-7

Keywords

Navigation