Europe PMC
Do data resources managed by EMBL-EBI and our collaborators make a difference to your work?
If so, please take 10 minutes to fill in our survey, and help us make the case for why sustaining open data resources is critical for life sciences research.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


A strong body of opinion contends that late terminations of pregnancy are better carried out by surgical methods. We show that the suggested advantages of greater safety and patient acceptance are based on out-of-date or inaccurate (biased) data. The advantages of medical methods are, however, equally unproven. However, we argue that the adverse emotional and symbolic effects of late surgical termination have moral force. We therefore contend that in the absence of strong patient preference, medical termination is the preferable method; and will remain of that opinion unless clear demonstration of the greater safety of surgical methods can be made at some future date.

Free full text 


Logo of jmedethLink to Publisher's site
J Med Ethics. 1989 Jun; 15(2): 82–85.
PMCID: PMC1375785
PMID: 2746608

Surgical abortion at twenty weeks: is morality determined solely by the outcome?

Abstract

A strong body of opinion contends that late terminations of pregnancy are better carried out by surgical methods. We show that the suggested advantages of greater safety and patient acceptance are based on out-of-date or inaccurate (biased) data. The advantages of medical methods are, however, equally unproven. However, we argue that the adverse emotional and symbolic effects of late surgical termination have moral force. We therefore contend that in the absence of strong patient preference, medical termination is the preferable method; and will remain of that opinion unless clear demonstration of the greater safety of surgical methods can be made at some future date.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (693K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Cates W, Jr, Tyler CW., Jr Mid-trimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation: a safe and practical alternative. N Engl J Med. 1977 May 19;296(20):1141–1145. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Cadesky KI, Ravinsky E, Lyons ER. Dilation and evacuation: a preferred method of midtrimester abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Feb 1;139(3):329–332. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Grimes DA, Hulka JF, McCutchen ME. Midtrimester abortion by dilatation and evacuation versus intra-amniotic instillation of prostaglandin F2 alpha: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Aug 1;137(7):785–790. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnstone FD, Beard RJ, Boyd IE, McCarthy TG. Cervical diameter after suction termination of pregnancy. Br Med J. 1976 Jan 10;1(6001):68–69. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hulka JF, Lefler HT, Jr, Anglone A, Lachenbruch PA. A new electronic force monitor to measure factors influencing cervical dilation for vacuum curettage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Sep 15;120(2):166–173. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaltreider NB, Goldsmith S, Margolis AJ. The impact of midtrimester abortion techniques on patients and staff. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Sep 15;135(2):235–238. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Wright CS, Campbell S, Beazley J. Second-trimester abortion after vaginal termination of pregnancy. Lancet. 1972 Jun 10;1(7763):1278–1279. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson JA, Dixon G. Effects of legal termination on subsequent pregnancy. Br Med J. 1976 May 29;1(6021):1303–1304. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu DT, Mmelville HA, Martin T. Subsequent gestational morbidity after various types of abortion. Lancet. 1972 Aug 26;2(7774):431–431. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Hogue CJ, Cates W, Jr, Tietze C. The effects of induced abortion on subsequent reproduction. Epidemiol Rev. 1982;4:66–94. [Abstract] [Google Scholar]
  • Valman HB, Pearson JF. What the fetus feels. Br Med J. 1980 Jan 26;280(6209):233–234. [Europe PMC free article] [Abstract] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Ethics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1136/jme.15.2.82

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
0
3
0

Article citations


Go to all (6) article citations

Similar Articles 


To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.