Abstract
The central objection to the constitution view is the too many thinkers problem – if the animal that constitutes you thinks and you are not it, then there are two thinkers within the region you occupy. Lynne Rudder Baker claims that the animal thinks only derivatively, in virtue of constituting the person that thinks nonderivatively, and this leads to a solution to the too many thinkers problem. This paper offers two objections to Baker’s solution. First, the idea of derivative/nonderivative properties faces a dilemma unacceptable to constitutionalists: either the too many thinkers problem is reinstated or the constitution view is undermined by the idea itself. Further, Baker should concede that the person thinks in virtue of brain functions. This implies, contra Baker’s claim, that the person thinks derivatively and the animal thinks nonderivatively. The paper also considers a way in which Baker might respond to the two objections.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to audiences at the Midsouth Philosophy Conference and the SCP’s Minds, Bodies, and Souls Conference. Thanks also to Jeff Engelhardt, referees for this journal, and especially Trenton Merricks.
References
Baker, L. R. 2000. Persons and Bodies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Baker, L. R. 2001. “Materialism with a Human Face.” In Soul, Body, and Survival, edited by K.Corcoran, 159–80. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501723520-012Search in Google Scholar
Baker, L. R. 2002. “The Ontological Status of Persons .” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research65:370–88.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00207.xSearch in Google Scholar
Carter, W. R. 1988. “Our Bodies, Our Selves .” Australasian Journal of Philosophy66:308–19.10.1080/00048408812343391Search in Google Scholar
Garrett, B. 1998. Personal Identity and Self-Consciousness. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 1987. “Human Beings .” Journal of Philosophy84:59–83.10.2307/2026626Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Lim, J. 2011. “Bodies and Persons: An Essay on Animalism.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Virginia.Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 1996. Subjects of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mackie, D. 1999. “Animalism versus Lockeanism: No Contest .” Philosophical Quarterly49:369–76.10.1111/1467-9213.00148Search in Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1997. “Reductionism and the First Person.” In Reading Parfit, edited by J.Dancy, 230–50. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Merricks, T. 2001. Objects and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245363.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Noonan, H. 1998. “Animalism versus Lockeanism: A Current Controversy .” Philosophical Quarterly48:302–18.10.1111/1467-9213.00102Search in Google Scholar
Noonan, H. 2003. Personal Identity, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203428351Search in Google Scholar
Olson, E. 1997. The Human Animal. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Olson, E. 2002. “What Does Functionalism Tell Us About Personal Identity? ” Noûs36:682–98.10.1111/1468-0068.00407Search in Google Scholar
Olson, E. 2007. What Are We?New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176421.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1999. “Self, Body, and Coincidence .” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society73:287–306.10.1111/1467-8349.00059Search in Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 2007. Physical Realization. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214396.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 2008. “Persons, Animals, and Identity .” Synthese162:313–24.10.1007/s11229-007-9253-ySearch in Google Scholar
Snowdon, P. 1990. “Persons, Animals, and Ourselves.” In The Person and the Human Mind, edited by C.Gill, 83–107. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Thomasson, A. 2007. Ordinary Objects. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195319910.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1996. “Reply to Paul Snowdon.” In Essays for David Wiggins, edited by S.Lovibond and S. G.Williams, 244–48. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. 1995. “Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution .” Philosophical Review104:53–110.10.2307/2186012Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by De Gruyter
