Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From Paternalism to Managerialism: A Healing Shift?

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, medical professionals have taken a paternalistic stance towards their patients and have relied on a traditional approach to medical ethics. In recent years, in Britain, however, a new ‘managerialism’ has developed in the National Health Service (the NHS). This stresses consumerism and greater patient choice and is changing the relationship between doctors and patients. This paper draws out the implications for patients. It describes the ethical characteristics of the two conflicting approaches and argues the need to stress again the view of the patient as an individual person.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forder A Concepts in Social Administration — a framework for analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1974 pp 119–139

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jones K, Brown J, Bradshaw J. Issues in Social Policy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1978 pp 59–77

    Google Scholar 

  3. Susser M W, Watson W Sociology in Medicine 2nd Edition Oxford: Oxford University Press 1971

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Downie R S Traditional medical ethics and economics in health care: a critique. In: Medical Ethics and Economics in Health Care. Eds Mooney G, McGuire A Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988 pp 40–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. ten Have H. Ethics and economics in health care: a medical philosopher’s view. In: Medical Ethics and Economics in Health Care. Eds Mooney G, McGuire A Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988 pp 23–39

    Google Scholar 

  6. Downie R S op cit p 46

  7. Beauchamp T L, Childress J F Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd Ed Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mill J S On Liberty Ed Acton H B London: J M Dent & Sons Ltd., 1980 p 223

  9. Childress J F Who should decide? Paternalism in health care New York: Oxford University Press 1982

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feinberg J Harm to Self Vol. III of The Moral Limits of Criminal Law New York: Oxford University Press 1986

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beauchamp T L, Childress J F op cit

  12. Benson H, Epstein M The placebo effect: a neglected aspect in the care of patients. Journal of the American Medical Association 232 (1975) 1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ernst E, Herxheimer A. The power of placebo BMJ 1996; 313: pp 1569–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dahan R, Caulin C et al. Does informed consent influence therapeutic outcome? BMJ 1986; 293 pp 363–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. London: Tavistock Publications 1957

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holliday I The NHS Transformed. Oxford: Nuffield Press 1995

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holliday I op cit pp 15–16

  18. This followed the publication of the Griffith’s Report, the report of a group chaired by Roy Griffiths, deputy managingdirector of the J Sainsbury supermarket chain. The report observed that "if Florence Nightingale were carrying her lamp through the corridors of the NHS today she would almost certainly be searching for the people in charge." Griffiths R. NHS Management Enquiry Report (the Griffiths Report). London: DHSS 1983

    Google Scholar 

  19. NHS Executive. Towards a primary care led NHS: An accountability framework for GP fundholding. Leeds: NHSE 1994

    Google Scholar 

  20. Department of Health The NHS Plan, Cmd 4818-I. London: The Stationery Office 2000

    Google Scholar 

  21. Department of Health NHS Direct a new gateway to healthcare. London: The Stationery Office 2000

    Google Scholar 

  22. This can be seen on the website www.nice.org.uk

  23. Department of Health A first class service — quality in the NHS. London: The Stationery Office 1997

    Google Scholar 

  24. Coulter A, Paternalism or partnership? BMJ 1999; 319 pp 719–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. See Tudor Hart J A new kind of doctor. London: Merlin Press 1988

    Google Scholar 

  26. Secretary of State for Health Saving lives: our healthier nation Cm 4386. London: The Stationery Office 1999

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guadagnli E, Ward P Patient participation in decision-making. Soc. Sci. Med. 1998; 47 pp 329–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Richards M A, Ramirez A J et al Offering choice of treatment to patients with cancer. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A pp 112–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Coulter A, Peto V, Doll H. Patients’ preferences and general practitioners’ decisions in treatment of menstrual disorders. Fam Pract 1994; 11 pp 67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NHS, East Kent, England

    Sandro Limentani (Director of Public Health)

Authors
  1. Sandro Limentani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Limentani, S. From Paternalism to Managerialism: A Healing Shift?. Philos. of Manag. 2, 3–9 (2002). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20022118

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20022118

Keywords

Search

Navigation