Abstract
Animal welfare in livestock farming is a general concept that involves many concrete ethical issues for which solutions need to be developed. To avoid disturbing the internal market, the European Union encourages market players to develop harmonized solutions to such issues. One issue is the castration of piglets without pain relief, the practice of which causes pain to piglets. Although scientists have found alternatives to replace castration without pain relief, the process of solving the castration issue has stagnated. Questions remain as to why this painful castration practice has still not been addressed after three decades, how it is likely to develop in the near future, and whether it will lead to a single harmonized solution for the EU. To answer these questions, this study examines the development of the castration issue using in-depth interviews and desk research. The results show that different countries have developed different solutions at different stages of the issue’s development. For a long period, the developments did not set a course toward a single solution; most EU pork producers waited for a castration ban in Germany. Such a situation was turbulent in solving the issue because the heterogeneous EU was unlikely to agree upon on a single alternative. With the EU now taking a market-based orientation, however, solving the issue now seems more likely. More attention is needed to understand market opportunities and chain integration in this area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“On-line” refers to the slaughter line. Briefly, carcasses go through a sensory evaluation by an expert.
The official notification from Germany in 1993 created tensions between the Danish and German governments. The Danish government asked the European Commission to take Germany to the Court of Justice in Luxembourg due to an infringement of EU law. In 1998, the European Court of Justice ruled that Germany had infringed on the Fresh Meat Directive as far as trade in meat from male pigs was concerned. Based on this conclusion, the Danish pork industry decided to start a civil court case in Germany claiming compensation from the Germany government for profit lost.
Latest update: the end of 2021.
Approximately 80–85% of piglets in Spain and Portugal are raised as entire males. The two countries, together with Ireland and United Kingdom (was part of the EU), have a tradition of producing entire males at a low weight or slaughtering them before reaching sexual maturity. In 2000, the UK introduced Red Tractor Assurance standards, a requirement of which is no castration. The Assurance scheme –– covering more than 90% of UK pig production –– emphasizes its reputation of a high level of animal welfare. Castration in these countries is generally unnecessary, because boar taint does not appear before puberty. However, the carcasses of younger pigs are less competitive on the market and not suitable for some special meat products. Their practice has not gained much attention from producers with economic motives.
References
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International organization, 58(2), 239–275
Aluwé, M., Vanhonacker, F., Millet, S., & Tuyttens, A. (2015). Influence of hands-on experience on pig farmers’ attitude towards alternatives for surgical castration of male piglets. Research in veterinary science, 103, 80–86
Anderson, J. R. (1997). Production of Entire Male Pigs; the Danish Perspective. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2016-10/aw_prac_farm_pigs_cast-alt_research_dmri_entire-male-pigs.pdf
Bee, G., Chevillon, P., & Bonneau, M. (2015). Entire male pig production in Europe. Animal Production Science, 55(12), 1347–1359
Čandek-Potokar, M., Škrlep, M., & Zamaratskaia, G. (2017). Immunocastration as Alternative to Surgical Castration in Pigs Theriogenology (Vol. 6, pp. 109–126)
Clark, B., Stewart, G. B., Panzone, L. A., Kyriazakis, I., & Frewer, L. J. (2017). Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies. Food Policy, 68, 112–127
Commission, E. (2021a). Alternatives to pig castration. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/animal-welfare/animal-welfare-practice/animal-welfare-farm/pigs/alternatives-pig-castration_en
Commission, E. (2021b). Pigmeat Statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/farming/facts-and-figures/markets/overviews/market-observatories/meat/pigmeat-statistics_en
Commission, E. (2021c). Pigmeat Trade. Retrieved from https://agridata.ec.europa.eu/extensions/DataPortal/pigmeat.html
De Briyne, N., Berg, C., Blaha, T., & Temple, D. (2016). Pig castration: will the EU manage to ban pig castration by 2018? Porcine health management, 2(1), 29
Duina, F. G. (1999). Harmonizing Europe: nation-states within the Common Market. SUNY Press
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International organization, 52(4), 887–917
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions
Georgallis, P. (2017). The link between social movements and corporate social initiatives: Toward a multi-level theory. Journal of business ethics, 142(4), 735–751
Gispert, M., Oliver, M., Velarde, A., Suarez, P., Pérez, J.,i, & Furnols, M. F. (2010). Carcass and meat quality characteristics of immunocastrated male, surgically castrated male, entire male and female pigs. Meat Science, 85(4), 664–670
Hackman, J. H. (2018). Agricultural Cooperation in Western Europe: Section C: Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Forgotton Books
Hay, M., Vulin, A., Génin, S., Sales, P., & Prunier, A. (2003). Assessment of pain induced by castration in piglets: behavioral and physiological responses over the subsequent 5 days. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 82(3), 201–218
Huber-Eicher, B., & Spring, P. (2008). Attitudes of Swiss consumers towards meat from entire or immunocastrated boars: A representative survey. Research in veterinary science, 85(3), 625–627
Judgment of the Court. Retrieved from https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document_print.jsf;jsessionid=F40E36E7C0DDB781B74D291D51D270C0?docid=77796&text=&doclang=EN&pageIndex=0&cid=9510894
Larson, E. M., Maribo, H., & Bejerholm, C. (1993). The production of entire male pigs in Denmark: The case of boar taint and sensory assessment. Retrieved from http://icomst-proceedings.helsinki.fi/papers/1993_04_13.pdf
Mena, S., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(3), 527–556
Mergenthaler, M., & Schröter, I. (2020). Market and Institutional Limits in Supplying Animal Welfare: some Conceptual Thoughts for Future Agricultural Economic Research. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 11(2), 127–138
Nalon, E., & Stevenson, P. (2019). Addressing lameness in farmed animals: An urgent need to achieve compliance with EU animal welfare law. Animals, 9(8), 576
Niemi, J. K., Sinisalo, A., Valros, A., & Heinonen, M. (2012). Market and policy-oriented incentives to provide animal welfare: The case of tail biting. Retrieved from
Oliver, M. A. (2009). ALCASDE - Final Report. Sanco. 2008/D5/018. Retrieved from
Panella-Riera, N., Blanch, M., Kallas, Z., Chevillon, P., Garavaldi, A., Gil, M., & Oliver, M. (2016). Consumers’ segmentation based on the acceptability of meat from entire male pigs with different boar taint levels in four European countries: France, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom. Meat Science, 114, 137–145
Ramirez, F. O., Soysal, Y., & Shanahan, S. (1997). The changing logic of political citizenship: Cross-national acquisition of women’s suffrage rights, 1890 to 1990.American sociological review,735–745
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 259–284
Towers, L. (2016). Progress Report: Castration of Pigs in the EU. Retrieved from https://thepigsite.com/news/2016/12/progress-report-castration-of-pigs-in-the-eu-1
Tutu, A. D. (2013). The global guide to animal protection. University of Illinois Press
Tuyttens, F. A., Struelens, E., Van Gansbeke, S., & Ampe, B. (2008). Factors influencing farmers’ responses to welfare legislation: A case study of gestation sow housing in Flanders (Belgium). Livestock Science, 116(1–3), 289–299
Tuyttens, F. A., Vanhonacker, F., Verhille, B., De Brabander, D., & Verbeke, W. (2012). Pig producer attitude towards surgical castration of piglets without anaesthesia versus alternative strategies. Research in veterinary science, 92(3), 524–530
Van Huik, M., & Bock, B. (2007). Attitudes of Dutch pig farmers towards animal welfare.British Food Journal
Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., & Tuyttens, F. (2009). Belgian consumers’ attitude towards surgical castration and immunocastration of piglets. Animal Welfare, 18(4), 371–380
Von Borell, E., Baumgartner, J., Giersing, M., Jäggin, N., Prunier, A., Tuyttens, F., & Edwards, S. (2009). Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal, 3(11), 1488–1496
Widmar, N. J. O., Morgan, C. J., & Croney, C. C. (2018). Perceptions of Social Responsibility of Prominent Animal Welfare Groups. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 21(1), 27–39
Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141–155). American Psychological Association
Acknowledgements
This study is conducted as part of the SuSI-project (Sustainability in pork production with immunocastration), funded by Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) as a part of the ERA-NET Confund SusAn (grantnr 696231) then supported by the Nanjing Agricultural University Yucai Program (grantnr SKYC2021001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) as part of the ERA-Net Cofund SusAn (grantnr 696231) through a virtual common pot model with EU top-up. This work was carried out by the Marketing and Consumer Behavior (MCB) group of Wageningen University in the Netherlands. Both authors, Dr. Li Lin-Schilstra and Dr. Paul Ingenbleek, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in the paper.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix Background information of interviewees
Appendix Background information of interviewees
Name | Country | Working experience with boar taint issue | Background | Year of the interview |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ulrike Weiler | Germany | 35 years | Research institute | 2018 |
Yves Beunnens | Belgium | 10 years | Industry | 2018 |
Niels Juul | Denmark | Confidential | Confidential | 2018 |
Michel Bonneau | France | 46 years | Research institute | 2018 |
Marijke Aluwé | Belgium | 13 years | Research institute | 2018 |
Gé Backus | Netherlands | 13 years | Institute and industry | 2018; 2022 |
Jakub Babol | Sweden | 27 years | Research institute | 2018 |
João Almeida | Portugal | Unknown | Research institute | 2018 |
Kai-Uwe Sprenger | Belgium | Unknown | European Commission | 2019 |
Anonymous | France | 13 years | NGO | 2019 |
Deborah Temple | Spain | 12 years | Research institute | 2022 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin-Schilstra, L., Ingenbleek, P.T. A complex ball game: piglet castration as a dynamic and complex social issue in the EU. J Agric Environ Ethics 35, 11 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-022-09886-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-022-09886-3