Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical analysis of knotless flexor tendon repair using large-diameter unidirection barbed suture

  • Surgery Articles
  • Published:
HAND

Abstract

Purpose

In traditional flexor tendon repairs, suture knots can be sites of weakness, impair tendon healing, stimulate an inflammatory response, and increase the bulk of the tendon repair. Because of this, there has been an increased interest in knotless flexor tendon repair using barbed suture. Since knots are not required, it may be possible to increase the strength of the tendon repair by using a large-diameter barbed suture. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare a traditional four-strand tendon repair using 3-0 braided polyester with a similar knotless four-strand tendon repair using 0 unidirectional barbed suture.

Methods

Twenty-two matched cadaveric flexor digitorum profundus tendons were lacerated and assigned to repair by a four-strand modified Kirchmayr–Kessler technique using 3-0 braided polyester (n = 11) or knotless four-strand modified Kirchmayr–Kessler repair using 0 unidirectional barbed suture (n = 11). Repaired tendons were linearly distracted to failure at 20 mm/min after 1 N preload. Maximum load and load at 2-mm gap formation were recorded. Maximum load and load at 2-mm gap formation were compared with the Student’s t test, and p values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

The mean maximum load of the barbed, knotless suture repair was higher than that of the traditional repair (52 vs. 42 N). There was no difference between the two groups in the mean load required to produce a 2-mm gap.

Conclusions

The four-strand knotless tendon repairs using a large-diameter unidirectional barbed suture were stronger than the traditional four-strand repairs using 3-0 braided polyester, and had similar 2-mm gap resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alavanja G, Dailey E, Mass DP. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study. J Hand Surg. 2005;30:448–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoki M, Kubota H, Pruitt DL, Manske PR. Biomechanical and histologic characteristics of canine flexor tendon repair using early postoperative mobilization. J Hand Surg. 1997;22:107–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Kubota H, Larson BJ. Work of flexion after flexor tendon repair according to the placement of sutures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;320:205–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aoki M, Manske PR, Pruitt DL, Larson BJ. Work of flexion after tendon repair with various suture methods. A human cadaveric study. J Hand Surg. 1995;20:310–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bainbridge LC, Robertson C, Gillies D, Elliot D. A comparison of post-operative mobilization of flexor tendon repairs with “passive flexion-active extension” and “controlled active motion” techniques. J Hand Surg. 1994;19B:517–21.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J, Merrell GA, Wolfe SW. Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg. 2001;26:340–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bunnell S. Gig pull-out suture for tendons. J Bone Joint Surg. 1954;36:850–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buonocore SD, Broer PN, Kaldany A, Sawh-Martinez R, Thomson JG. The effects of A1 pulley release after flexor tendon repair in a cadaveric model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):857–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buonocore S, Sawh-Martinez R, Emerson JW, Mohan P, Dymarczyk M, Thomson JG. The effects of edema and self-adherent wrap on the work of flexion in a cadaveric hand. J Hand Surg. 2012;37(7):1349–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giesen T, Sirotakova M, Copsey AJ, Elliot D. Flexor pollicis longus primary repair: further experience with the tang technique and controlled active mobilization. J Hand Surg. 2009;34:758–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gussous YM, Zhao C, Amadio PC, An KN. The resurgence of barbed suture and connecting devices for use in flexor tendon tenorrhaphy. Hand. 2011;6:268–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang MD, Pettrone S, Trumble TE. Work of flexion related to different suture materials after flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis tendon repair in zone II: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg. 2009;34(4):700–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jennings ER. A new technique in primary tendon repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1952;95:597–600.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings ER. Barbwire tendon suture; clinical experience with thirty flexor tendons. AMA Arch Surg. 1955;70:566–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jennings ER. Tendon sutures. Md State Med J. 1954;3:17–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lengemann F. A new wire tendon suture. Zentrabl Chir. 1951;76:964–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Manske PR, Gelberman RH, Vande Berg JS, Lesker PA. Intrinsic flexor-tendon repair. A morphological study in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg. 1984;66:385–96.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marrero-Amadeo IC, Chauhan A, Warden SJ, Merrell GA. Flexor tendon repair with a knotless barbed suture: a comparative biomechanical study. J Hand Surg. 2011;36:1204–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McClellan WT, Schessler MJ, Ruch DS, Levin LS, Goldner RD. A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:322–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mckee GK. Metal anastomosis tubes in tendon suture. Lancet. 1945;245:659–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McKenzie AR. An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg. 1967;49:440–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McKenzie AR. Function after reconstruction of severed long flexor tendons of the hand. A review of 297 tendons. J Bone Joint Surg. 1967;49:424–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Momose T, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Zobitz ME, An KN. The effect of knot location, suture material, and suture size on the gliding resistance of flexor tendons. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53:806–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Parikh PM, Davison SP, Higgins JP. Barbed suture tenorrhaphy: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1551–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pruitt DL, Aoki M, Manske PR. Effect of suture knot location on tensile strength after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg. 1996;21:969–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw PC. A method of flexor tendon suture. J Bone Joint Surg. 1968;50:578–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Strickland JW. Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg. 2000;25:214–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Strickland JW. Flexor tendon injuries: I. Foundations of treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3:44–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang JB, Wang B, Chen F, Pan CZ, Xie RG. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;386:252–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang JB, Xie RG, Cao Y, Ke ZS, Xu Y. A2 pulley incision or one slip of the superficialis improves flexor tendon repairs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;456:121–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Taras JS, Raphael JS, Marczyk SC, Bauerle WB. Evaluation of suture caliber in flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg. 2001;26:1100–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Trail IA, Powell ES, Noble J. An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. J Hand Surg. 1989;14:422–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Trail IA, Powell ES, Noble J. The mechanical strength of various suture techniques. J Hand Surg. 1992;17:89–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Trocchia AM, Aho HN, Sobol G. A re-exploration of the use of barbed sutures in flexor tendon repairs. Orthopedics 2009;32.

  35. van Rijssel EJ, Brand R, Admiraal C, Smit I, Trimbos JB. Tissue reaction and surgical knots: the effect of suture size, knot configuration, and knot volume. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:64–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wada A, Kubota H, Miyanishi K, Hatanaka H, Miura H, Iwamoto Y. Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg. 2001;26:301–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Xie RG, Cao Y, Xu XF, Zhu B. The gliding force and work of flexion in the early days after primary repair of lacerated flexor tendons: an experimental study. J Hand Surg. 2008;33(2):192–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang C, Zhao C, Amadio PC, Tanaka T, Zhao KD, An KN. Total and intrasynovial work of flexion of human cadaver flexor digitorum profundus tendons after modified Kessler and MGH repair techniques. J Hand Surg. 2005;30(3):466–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zeplin PH, Zahn RK, Meffert RH, Schmidt K. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material: a comparative ex vivo study. J Hand Surg. 2011;36:446–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao C, Amadio PC, Momose T, Couvreur P, Zobitz ME, An KN. The effect of suture technique on adhesion formation after flexor tendon repair for partial lacerations in a canine model. J Trauma. 2001;51:917–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1801 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA

    Toni E. Lin, Chrisovalantis Lakhiani, Michael R. Lee, Michel Saint-Cyr & Douglas M. Sammer

Authors
  1. Toni E. Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chrisovalantis Lakhiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael R. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michel Saint-Cyr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Douglas M. Sammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas M. Sammer.

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, T.E., Lakhiani, C., Lee, M.R. et al. Biomechanical analysis of knotless flexor tendon repair using large-diameter unidirection barbed suture. HAND 8, 315–319 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9491-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-012-9491-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation