Skip to main content
Log in

Choice Functions and Scope of Existential Polarity Wh-Phrases in Mandarin Chinese

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent popular analysis of English indefinites isthat they involve a choice function mechanism in their semantic interpretation. However,there are diversified views regarding how intermediate scope readings should be dealt withand which level(s) existential closure should apply to. This paper attempts to make acontribution to this debate by examining existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese. I showthat unlike the behaviors of polarity indefinites in St'át'imcets reported by Matthewson(1999), intermediate scope readings are possible for polarity wh-phrases in Chinese but aresubject to some locality conditions. I suggest that implicit arguments of choice functionsmight have a parametric value the choice of which affects availability of intermediate readings.The findings in this paper thus revive the possibility, rejected by Matthewson (1999), that thechoice function mechanism may vary from language to language or from indefinite NPs in onelanguage to indefinite NPs in another language or even from one type of indefiniteNP to another type of indefinite NP within the same language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, C. L.: 1970, 'Notes on the Description of English Questions. The Role of an Abstract Question Morpheme', Foundations of Language 6, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L.-S. L.: 1991, On the Typology of Wh-Questions, PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L.-S. L.: 1994, 'Wh-Words as Polarity Items', in R.-K. Li (ed.), Chinese Languages and Linguistics II, pp. 614–640, Academia Sinica, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L.-S. L. and C.-T. J. Huang: 1998, 'Two Types of Donkey Sentences', Natural Language Semantics 4, 121–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G.: 2001, 'A Puzzle about Indefinites', in C. Cecchetto, G. Chierchia and M. Tersa Guasti (eds.), Semantic Interfaces, pp. 51–89, CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.: 1979, 'The Interpretation of Pronouns', in F. Heny and H. S. Schnelle (eds.), Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table (= Syntax and Semantics 10), pp. 61–92, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1967, 'The Logical Form of Action Sentences', in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, pp. 81–95, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, M.: 1990, The Syntactic Roots of Semantic Partition, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, M.: 1992, Indefinites, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J.-Y.: 1985, 'Wuding NP Zhuwujyu [Sentences with an Indefinite Subject]', Zhongguo Yuwen 5, 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D.: 1981, 'Quantifier Scope and Syntactic Islands', Proceedings of the Seventeenth Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago University, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D. and I. A. Sag: 1982, 'Referential and Quantificational Indefinites', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C. L.: 1973, 'Questions in Montague English', Foundations of Language 10, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C.-T. J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., H. Pan, and C. Zou: 1997, 'On the Semantic Content of Noun Phrases', in L.-J. Xu (ed.), The Referential Properties of Chinese Noun Phrases [Collection des Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 2], pp. 3–24, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1981, 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation', in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language: Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Part I, Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: 1977, 'Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1989, 'An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1998, 'Scope or Pseudo-Scope? Are There Wide-Scope Indefinites?', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events in Grammar, pp. 163–196, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1975, 'Adverbs of Quantification', in E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 3–15, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y.-H. A.: 1992, 'Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese', Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W.: 1996, Polarity Licensing and Wh-Phrase Quantification in Chinese, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.-W.: 1997, 'Restrictive vs. Nonrestrictive Relative Clauses in Chinese', Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (ICCL 7), June 19–21, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

  • Lin, J.-W.: 1998, 'On Existential Polarity Wh-Phrases in Chinese', Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7, 219–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewson, L.: 1999, 'On The Interpretation of Wide-Scope Indefinites', Natural Language Semantics 7, 79–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, G.: 1974, Existential Sentences in English, PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, T.: 1986, Quantification in Syntax, PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, T.: 1990, Quantification in the Theory of Grammar, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H.: 1989, 'Many Quantifiers', in Joyce Powers and Kenneth de Jong (eds.), Proceedings of 5th Eastern State Conference on Linguistics, Columbus, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D.: 1987, “Wh-in-Situ: Movement and Unselective Binding”, in E. Reuland and A. Ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, pp. 98–129, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T.: 1992, 'Wh-in-situ: An Apparent Paradox', in P. Dekker et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium.

  • Reinhart, T.: 1997, 'Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided between QR and Choice Functions', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, P.: 1998, 'A Note on Skolem Functions and the Scope of Indefinites', Unpublished manuscript, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

  • Tsai, W.-T. D.: 1999, On Economizing the Theory of A-Bar Dependencies, Garland Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Y.: 1997, 'Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of the Indefinites', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 399–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L.-J. and D.-Q. Liu: 1998, Huati de Jiegou han Gongneng [The Structure and Function of Topics], Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, JW. Choice Functions and Scope of Existential Polarity Wh-Phrases in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 451–491 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000024407.76999.f7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LING.0000024407.76999.f7

Keywords

Navigation