Abstract
Between 1900 and 1930 colloid chemistry, a branch of physical chemistry, gained crucial importance for the understanding of vital phenomena. To many it seemed that the properties of colloids would differ from those of ordinary matter, paralleling the specific properties of protoplasm, the “living substance”. The application of theoretical concepts and experimental models of colloid chemistry to biological problems shaped “Biocolloidology” as a new research program, which appeared promising for the exploration of organic processes such as mitotic cell division, growth, muscle contraction and movement. “Biocolloidology” could simultaneously absorb the quest for a physical-chemical explanation of life and the (post)-romantic notion of organic nature as a container of creative and vital forces that was central to life-philosophy. At least until the late 1920s, it is argued, the merging of different scientific and philosophical metaphors made “Biocolloidology” and the concept of protoplasm highly appealing in a broad cultural context.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Bergson, Henri (1967):Schöpferische Entwicklung. Zürich [original 1907].
Bertalanffy, Ludwig v. (1932):Theoretische Biologie. Bd. 1. Berlin.
Burwick. Frederick; Douglas, Paul (eds.) (1992):The crisis in modernism. Bergson and the vitalist controversy. Cambridge University Press.
Donnan, F. G. (1942/44): „Herbert Freundlich”.Obituary Notices of Fellows of The Royal Society 4: 27–50.
Florkin, Marcel (1972):A History of Biochemistry. Part I/II (=Comprehensive Biochemistry Vol. 30). Amsterdam—London—New York.
Freundlich, Herbert (1924a):Kolloidchemie und Biologie. Dresden—Leipzig.
Freundlich, Herbert (1924b): „Jacques Loeb und die Kolloidchemie”.Die Naturwissenschaften 12: 602 f.
Freundlich, Herbert (1927): „Neuere Fortschritte der Kolloidchemie und ihre biologische Bedeutung”.Protoplasma 2:278–299.
Freundlich, Herbert; Enslin, O.; Söllner, K. (1933): „Über die Bildung von Taktoiden in Gemischen zweier Sole und ihre biologische Bedeutung”.Protoplasma 17:489–98.
Gaidukov, N. (1929): „Das Protoplasma als dynamischer Begriff”.Protoplasma 6: 162–96.
Geison, Gerald (1969) „The Protoplasmic Theory of Life and the Vitalist-Mechanist Debate”.Isis 60: 273–292.
Glas, Eduard (1979):Chemistry and Physiology in their Historical and Philosophical Relations. Delft.
Graham, Thomas (1861): „Liquid Diffusion applied to Analysis”.Philosophical Transactions 151:183–224.
Hall, Thomas S. (1969):Ideas of Life and Matter. Bd. 2. Chicago—London.
Heidenhain, Martin (1907):Plasma und Zelle. Erste Abteilung. Allgemeine Anatomie der lebendigen Masse. Jena.
Hille, Hermann (1925): „A History of Colloids in Medicine.”,Medical Life 32:419–53.
Kohler, Robert (1975): „The History of Biochemistry: A Survey.”Journal of the History of Biology 8:275–318.
Kraus, Friedrich (1926):Die allgemeine und spezielle Pathologie der Person. Klinische Syzygiologie. Besonderer Teil. I: Tiefenperson. Leipzig.
Lenoir, Timothy (1982):The Strategy of Life: Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth-Century German Biology. Dordrecht.
Lindner, Martin (im Druck):Die Pathologie der Person. Friedrich Kraus' Neubestimmung des Organismus am Beginn des 20. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: GNT-Verlag.
Loeb, Jacques (1906):Vorlesungen über die Dynamik der Lebenserscheinungen. Leipzig.
Mazumdar, Pauline M. H. (1974): „The Antigen-Antibody Reaction and the Physics and Chemistry of Life”.Bulletin of the History of Medicine 48:1–21.
Ostwald, Wolfgang (1920):Die Welt der vernachlässigten Dimensionen. 4. Aufl., Dresden—Leipzig [1. Aufl. 1915].
Pauly, Philip J. (1987):Controlling Life. Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. Oxford University Press.
Pritykin, L. M. (1981): „The Role of Concepts of Structur in the Development of the Physical Chemistry of Polymers”.Isis 72:446–56.
Servos, John W. (1990):Physical chemistry from Ostwald to Pauling: The making of a science in America. Princeton University Press.
Sühnel, Klaus (1989): „80 Jahre Kolloidchemie—Leben und Werk Wolfgang Ostwalds”.Schriftenreihe für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 26, Heft 2:31–45.
Teich, Mikuláš (1973): „From ‘Enchyme’ to ‘Cyto-skeleton’: The Development of Ideas on the Chemical Organization of Living Matter”Changing Perspectives in the History of Science, hrsg. v. Mikuláš Teich, Robert Young. London: 439–71.
Uexküll, Jakob v. (1921):Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. 2. Aufl., Berlin.
Virchow, Rudolf (1858):Die Cellularpathologie in ihrer Begründung auf physiologische und pathologische Gewebelehre. Berlin. Nachdruck, Hildesheim 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindner, M. Der Stoff, aus dem das Leben ist. NTM N.S. 8, 11–21 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914166
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914166