Skip to main content
Log in

Functionalist and Conflict Views of AICPA Code of Conduct: Public Interest vs. Self Interest

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sociological models of functionalism and conflict are introduced and utilized to analyze professionalism in the accounting profession as it is manifest in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountant's Code of Conduct. Rule 203 of the Code and provisions of the Code related to the public interest are examined using semiotic analysis to determine if they are most consistent with the functionalist or conflict models. While the analysis does not address intent of the Code, it is determined that the Code contains semantic defects which result in different interpretations of the Code to different readers. The defects found are most consistent with the conflict model of professionalism. This has implications for the public and for individuals within the profession, making the Code less useful to both groups. The defects are seen as a potential battleground for the self-interest vs the public interest orientation of the accounting profession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants: 1988, Code of Conduct (AICPA, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, A. K.: 1973, 'How Free Should Professions Be?', in Professions and Prospects (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills/London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J. and A. D. Spaulding: 1993, The Accountant's Guide to Legal Liability and Ethics (Irwin, Homewood, Illinois).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptman, R. and F. Hill: 1991, 'Deride, Abide or Dissent: On the Ethics of Professional Conduct', Journal of Business Ethics 10, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Terence: 1972, Professionalism and Power (The MacMillan Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, T. D.: 1976, 'Marxist and Functionalist Theories in the Study of Stratification: Common Elements that Lead to a Test', Social Forces 54, 559–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kultgen, J.: 1988, Ethics and Professionalism (University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kultgen, J.: 1983, 'The Ideological Use of Professional Codes', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1(3), 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. S.: 1977, The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (University of California Press, Berkley).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, B.: 1991, Ethical Conduct and the Professional's Dilemma: Choosing Between Service and Success (Quorum Books, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, L.: 1982, 'The Origin of Professionalism: Sociological Conclusions and Ethical Implications', Business and Professional Ethics Journal 1(4), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott: 1954, 'The Professions and Social Structure', Essays in Sociological Theory (The Free Press, Glencoe, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruland, R. and C. Lindblom: 1992, 'Ethics and Disclosure: An Analysis of Conflicting Duties', Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3, 259–272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindblom, C.K., Ruland, R.G. Functionalist and Conflict Views of AICPA Code of Conduct: Public Interest vs. Self Interest. Journal of Business Ethics 16, 573–582 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017950006942

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017950006942

Keywords

Navigation