Skip to main content
Log in

Generalization of complementarity

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Barbour, I. G.: 1960, ‘The Methods of Science and Religion’, in H. Shapley (ed.), Science Ponders Religion, Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp. 196–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, H. and P. Oppenheim: 1961, ‘Complementarity in Quantum Mechanics: A Logical Analysis’, Synthese 13, 201–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E.: 1960, Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N.: 1934, Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N.: 1958, Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, M.: 1949, The Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, N. and P. Oppenheim: 1969, ‘Application of Bohr's Principle of Complementarity to the Mind-Body Problem’, The Journal of Philosophy 66, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. and E.H. Lenneberg: 1954, ‘A Study in Language and Cognition’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49, 454–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1955, ‘Strife About Complementarity’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6, 1–12, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsmith, J. M. and E. Aronson: 1963, ‘Some Hedonic Consequences of the Confirmation and Disconfirmation of Expectancies’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 66, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1962, ‘The Aim of Inductive Logic’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, C. A.: 1955, Science and Christian Belief, The Univ. of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBroglie, L.: 1953, The Revolution in Physics, The Noonday Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H.: 1958, ‘The ‘Mental’ and the ‘Physical’’, in H. Feigl, M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 2, Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 370–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1968, ‘On a Recent Critique of Complementarity’, Part I, Philosophy of Science 35, 309–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.: 1969, ‘On a Recent Critique of Complementarity’, Part II, Philosophy of Science 36, 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P.: 1957, Philosophy of Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, W.: 1958, Physics and Philosophy, Harper and Brothers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1939, ‘Vagueness and Logic’, Philosophy of Science 6, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1952, Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. II, No. 7, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutten, E.: 1956, The Language of Modern Physics, George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. and P. Oppenheim, ‘The Bargain Principle’ (forthcoming).

  • Margenau, H.: 1950, The Nature of Physical Reality, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, W.: 1950, ‘Die philosophische Bedeutung der Idee der Komplementarität’, Experientia 6, 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, A.: 1968, Quantum Physics and the Philosophical Tradition, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, W.: 1958, Change and Providence, God's Action in a World Governed by Scientific Law, Scribner and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V.: 1966, The Ways of Paradox, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R.: 1963, ‘On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment’, American Scientist 51, 268–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E.: 1953, ‘What Is Matter?’, Scientific American 189, 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H.: 1949, Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H.: 1945, ‘On Biological Transformations’, in Essays on Growth and Form Presented to D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors gratefully acknowledge critical suggestions towards the final formulation by H. Bedau, N. Brody, Judith Economos, C. G. Hempel, F. Kling, A. Nehamas, F. Oppenheim, and M. Sukale. The full responsibility for the article lies, of course, solely with the authors. Financial help of the Foundation for Research in Philosophy of Science, Princeton, N.J., for this project is greatly appreciated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindenberg, S., Oppenheim, P. Generalization of complementarity. Synthese 28, 117–139 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485231

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485231

Navigation