Soziale Strukturen, generative Mechanismen und das gute Leben

Literatur

Adorno, Theodor W. (1966): Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1997.Search in Google Scholar

Alcoff, Linda Martin/Hames-Garcia, Michael/Mohanty, Satya P./Moya, Paula M. L. (Hrsg.) (2006): Identity Politics Reconsidered. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403983398Search in Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis (1965): „Einführung. Vom ‚Kapital‘ zur Philosophie von Marx“. In: Louis Althusser/Etienne Balibar: Das Kapital lesen. Hamburg: Rohwohlt 1972, S. 11–93.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (1982): „Morphogenesis versus structuration. On combining structure and action“. In: The British Journal of Sociology. 33. Jg., Heft 4, S. 455–483.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (1988): Culture and Agency. The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (1995): Realist Social Theory. The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557675Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (2000): Being Human. The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488733Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (2003): Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139087315Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (2007): Making our Way through the World. Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618932Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (2010a): „Routine, reflexivity, and realism“. In: Sociological Theory. 28. Jg., Heft 3, S. 272–303.10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.xSearch in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (2010b): „Introduction. The reflexive re-turn“. In: Margaret S. Archer (Hrsg.): Conversations About Reflexivity. Oxon, New York: Routledge, S. 1–13.10.4324/9780203867556-6Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S. (2012): The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108058Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S./Bhaskar, Roy/Collier, Andrew/Lawson, Tony/Norrie, Allan (Hrsg.) (1998): Critical Realism. Essential Readings. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Archer, Margaret S./Elder-Vass, Dave (2012): „Cultural System or norm circles? An exchange“. In: European Journal of Sociology. 15. Jg., Heft 1, S. 93–115.10.1177/1368431011423592Search in Google Scholar

Bartelborth, Thomas (2007): Erklären. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110916867Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Ted (1977): Philosophical Foundations of the Three Sociologies. London, Boston: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Ted (1981a): „Realism and social science. Some comments on Roy Bhaskar’s The Possibility of Naturalism. In: Radical Philosophy 27, S. 13–21.Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Ted (1981b): „‚Objective‘ interests and the sociology of power“. In: Sociology. 15. Jg., Heft 2, S. 161–184.10.1177/003803858101500202Search in Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy (1975): A Realist Theory of Science. Sussex, New Jersey: Harvester Press 1978.Search in Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy (1979): The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Sussex: Harvester Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy (1986): Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy (1993): Dialectic. The Pulse of Freedom. London, New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Bhaskar, Roy/Hartwig, Mervyn (2010): The Formation of Critical Realism. A Personal Perspective. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203878088Search in Google Scholar

Boghossian, Paul (2006): Angst vor der Wahrheit. Ein Plädoyer gegen Relativismus und Konstruktivismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Borchert, Jens/Lessenich, Stephan (2004): „‚Spätkapitalismus‘ revisited. Claus Offes Theorie und die adaptive Selbsttransformation der Wohlfahrtsstaatsanalyse“. In: Zeitschrift für Sozialreform. 50. Jg., Heft 6, S. 563–583.Search in Google Scholar

Brassier, Ray (2011): „Concepts and Objects“. In: Bryant, Levi/ Srnicek, Nick/Harman, Graham (Hrsg.): The Speculative Turn. Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: Re.Press, S. 47–65.Search in Google Scholar

Brenner, Robert (1989): „Bourgeois revolution and transition to capitalism“. In: A. L. Beier/David Cannadine/James M. Rosenheim (Hrsg.): The First Modern Society. Essays in English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 271–304.Search in Google Scholar

Brubaker, Rogers (2002): „Ethnicity without groups“. In: European Journal of Sociology. 43. Jg., Heft 2, S. 163–189.10.1017/S0003975602001066Search in Google Scholar

Bryant, Levi R. (2011): The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbour: Open Humanities Press.10.3998/ohp.9750134.0001.001Search in Google Scholar

Buckley, Walter (1967): Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Bunge, Mario (1996): Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bunge, Mario (2003): Emergence and Convergence. Qualtiative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442674356Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Judith (1990): Das Unbehagen der Geschlechter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Callinicos, Alex (2001): „Critical Realism and beyond. Roy Bhaskar’s Dialectic“. In: Jaques Bidet/Stathis Kouvelakis (Hrsg.): Critical Companion to Contemporary Marxism. Leiden, Boston: Brill 2008, S. 567–586.Search in Google Scholar

Celikates, Robin (2009): Kritik als soziale Praxis. Gesellschaftliche Selbstverständigung und kritische Theorie. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus.Search in Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000): Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Colapietro, Vincent (2010): „Cartesian privacy and Peircian interiority“. In: Margaret S. Archer (Hrsg.): Conversations About Reflexivity. Oxon, New York: Routledge, S. 39–54.Search in Google Scholar

Collier, Andrew (1998): „Language, practice and realism“. In: Ian Parker (Hrsg.): Social Constructionism, Discourse and Realism. London: Sage, S. 47–58.10.4135/9781446217412.n4Search in Google Scholar

Collier, Andrew (1999): Being and Worth. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Patricia Hill (1998): Fighting Words. Black Women & The Search for Justice. Minneapolis. University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Danermark, Berth/Ekström, Mats/Jakobson, Liselotte/Karlsson, Jan Ch. (2002): Explaining Society. Critical Realism in the Social Sciences. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald (1963): „Handlungen, Gründe und Ursachen“. In: Donald Davidson: Handlung und Ereignis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1990, S. 19–42.Search in Google Scholar

DeLanda, Manuel (2006): A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London, New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

DeLanda, Manuel (2011): „Emergence, causality and realism“. In: Levi Bryant/Nick Srnicek/Graham Harman (Hrsg.): The Speculative Turn. Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: Re.Press, S. 381–392.Search in Google Scholar

Dörre, Klaus (2012): „Finance capitalism, Landnahme and discriminating precariousness. Relevance for a new social critique.“ In: Social Change Review. 10. Jg., Heft 2, S. 125–151.Search in Google Scholar

Dörre, Klaus/Lessenich, Stephan/Rosa, Hartmut (2009): Soziologie – Kapitalismus – Kritik. Eine Debatte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, Dave (2007a): „Luhmann and emergentism. Competing paradigms for social systems theory?“ In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 37. Jg., Heft 4, S. 408–432.10.1177/0048393107307660Search in Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, Dave (2007b): „Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action“. In: Sociological Theory. 25. Jg., Heft 4, S. 325–346.10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00312.xSearch in Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, Dave (2008): „Searching for realism, structure and agency iin Actor Network Theory“. In: The British Journal of Sociology. 59. Jg., Heft 3, S. 455–473.Search in Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, Dave (2010a): The Causal Power of Social Structures. Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761720Search in Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, Dave (2010b): „Realist critique without ethical naturalism and moral realism“. In: Journal of Critical Realism. 9. Jg., Heft 1, S. 33–58.10.1558/jcr.v9i1.33Search in Google Scholar

Elder-Vass, Dave (2012): The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139169202Search in Google Scholar

Fleetwood, Steve (2008): „Structure, institutions, agency. Habit and reflexive deliberations“. In: Journal of Institutional Economics. 4. Jg., Heft 2, S. 183–203.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy (1989): „Wie kritisch ist die kritische Theorie?“ In: Nancy Fraser: Widerspenstige Praktiken. Macht, Diskurs, Geschlecht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1994, S. 173–221.Search in Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy (2007): „Identity, exclusion, and critique. A response to four critics“. In: European Journal of Political Theory. 6. Jg., Heft 3, S. 305–338.10.1177/1474885107077319Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Christian/Hofkirchner, Wolfgang (2009): „Autopoiesis and critical social systems theory“. In: Rodrigo Magalhães/Ron Sanchez (Hrsg.): Autopoiesis in Organization Theory and Practice. Bingley: Emerald, S. 111–129.Search in Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony (1976): New Rules of Socilogical Method. Cambridge: Polity 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony (1984): The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Gorski, Philip S. (2009): „Social ‚mechanism‘ and comparative-historical sociology. A critical realist proposal“. In: Peter Hedström/Björn Wittrock (Hrsg.): Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden, Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004165694.i-450.48Search in Google Scholar

Gorski, Philip S. (2013): „What is critical realism? And why should you care?“. In: Contemporary Sociology. 42. Jg., Heft 5, S. 658–670.10.1177/0094306113499533Search in Google Scholar

Groff, Ruth (2004): Critical Realism, Post-positivism, and the Possibility of Knowledge. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203417270Search in Google Scholar

Groff, Ruth (2012): Ontology Revisited. Metaphysics in Social and Political Philosophy. Oxon, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203855157Search in Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian (1983): Einführung in die Philosophie der Naturwissenschaften (engl.: Representing and Intervening). Stuttgart: Reclam 1996.Search in Google Scholar

Harman, Graham (2011): The Quadruple Object. Winchester, Washington: Zero Books.Search in Google Scholar

Harré, Rom (1970): The Principles of Scientific Thinking. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-81592-0Search in Google Scholar

Harré, Rom/Madden, Edward H. (1975): Causal Powers. Theory of Natural Necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hedström, Peter (2005): Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hooks, Bell (1981): Ain’t I a Woman. Black Women and Feminism. Cambridge: South End Press 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2011): „Emergenz. Postulate und Kandidaten“. In: Jens Greve/Annette Schnabel (Hrsg.): Emergenz. Zur Analyse und Erklärung komplexer Strukturen. Berlin: Suhrkamp, S. 37–58.Search in Google Scholar

Isaac, Jeffrey C. (1987): Power and Marxist Theory. A Realist View. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan (2010): A Revolution of the Mind. Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400831609Search in Google Scholar

James, C. L. R. (1937): The Black Jacobins. Toussaint L’Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution. New York: Vintage 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Jay, Martin (1984): Adorno. London: Fontana.Search in Google Scholar

Joas, Hans (1996): Die Kreativität des Handelns, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto/Mouffe, Chantal (1985): Hegemonie und radikale Demokratie. Zur Dekonstruktion des Marxismus (engl.: Hegemony and Socialist Strategy). Wien: Passagen 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Kaidesoja, Tuukka (2007): „Exploring the concept of causal power in a critical realist tradition“. In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 37. Jg., Heft 1, S. 63–87.10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00324.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kaidesoja, Tuukka (2009): „Bhaskar and Bunge on social emergence“. In: Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 39. Jg., Heft 3, S. 300–322.10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00409.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (1781/7): Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Meiner 1956.Search in Google Scholar

Kittler, Friedrich (1985): Aufschreibesystme 1800/1900. München: Wilhelm Fink 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Kocka, Jürgen (2000): „Zivilgesellschaft als historisches Problem und Versprechen“. In: Manfred Hildermeier/Jürgen Kocka/Christoph Conrad (Hrsg.): Europäische Zivilgesellschaft in Ost und West. Begriff, Geschichte, Chancen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, S. 13–39.Search in Google Scholar

Lawson, Tony (1997): Economics and Reality. London, New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203195390Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul (2010): „Peter Berger and his critics. The significance of emergence“. In: Society. 47. Jg., Heft 3, S. 207–213.Search in Google Scholar

Lindner, Urs (2013): Marx und die Philosophie. Wissenschaftlicher Realismus, ethischer Perfektionismus und kritische Sozialtheorie. Stuttgart: Schmetterling.Search in Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (1996): Die Realität der Massenmedien. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.10.1007/978-3-663-01103-3Search in Google Scholar

Mader, Dimitri (2013): „‚Conditioning is not determinism‘. Margaret S. Archers Agency-Theorie und die herrschaftsförmige Einschränkung von Handlungsfähigkeit durch Geschlecht und Klasse“. In: Vera Kallenberg/Jennifer Meyer/Johanna M. Müller (Hrsg.): Intersectionality und Kritik. Neue Perspektiven für alte Fragen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, S. 219–243.Search in Google Scholar

Mader, Dimitri/Lindner, Urs/Pühretmayer, Hans (2015): „Einleitung“. In: Urs Lindner/Dimitri Mader (Hrsg.): Critical Realism meets kritische Sozialtheorie. Bielefeld: Transkript.Search in Google Scholar

Meillassoux, Quentin (2006): Nach der Endlichkeit. Versuch über die Notwendigkeit der Kontingenz. Zürich: Diaphanes 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Menon, Nivedita (2002): „Universalism without foundations?“. In: Economy and Society. 31. Jg., Heft 1, S.152–169.10.1080/03085140120109295Search in Google Scholar

Menon, Nivedita/Nigam, Aditya (2007): Power and Contestation. India Since 1989. London: Zed Books.10.5040/9781350221956Search in Google Scholar

Mepham, John/Ruben, David-Hillel (Hrsg.) (1979): Issues in Marxist Philosophy I-III. Sussex: Harvester Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mohanty, Satya P. (1997): Literary Theory and the Claims of History. Postmodernism, Objectivity, Multicultural Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501728938Search in Google Scholar

Morriss, Peter (1987): Power. A Philosophical Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moya, Paula M.L./Hames-Garcia, Michael R. (Hrsg.) (2000): Reclaiming Identity. Realist Theory and the Predicaments of Postmodernism. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520924949Search in Google Scholar

Muraca, Barbara (2013): „Décroissance. A project for a radical transformation of society“. In: Environmental Values. 22. Jg, Heft 2, S. 147–169.Search in Google Scholar

Nesbitt, Nick (2008): Universal Emancipation. The Haitian Revolution and the Radical Enlightenment. Charlottesville, London: University of Virginia Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nigam, Aditya (2014): „Capital, growth and molecular socialism. Reflections from the Indian context“. Vortrag am Postwachstums-Kolleg Jena, 27.2.2014.Search in Google Scholar

Obrecht, Werner (2005): „Der emergentistische Systemismus Mario Bunges und das Systemtheoretische Paradigma der Sozialarbeitswissenschaft und der Sozialen Arbeit (SPSA)“. In: http://www.sozialarbeit.ch/dokumente/bunge_spsa.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Phillips, Anne (2007): Multiculturalism without Culture, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1972): Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1979.Search in Google Scholar

Potter, Garry (2006): „Reopening the wound. Against god and Bhaskar“. In: Journal of Critical Realism. 5. Jg., Heft 1, S. 92–109.10.1558/jocr.v5i1.92Search in Google Scholar

Psillos, Stathis (1999): Scientific Realism. How Science Tracks Truth. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary (2004): The Collaps of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pdrpz4Search in Google Scholar

Rosa, Hartmut (2012): Weltbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Beschleunigung. Umrisse einer neuen Gesellschaftskritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, Keith R. (2011): „Emergenz, Komplexität und die Zukunft der Soziologie“. In: Jens Greve/Annette Schnabel (Hrsg.): Emergenz. Zur Analyse und Erklärung komplexer Strukturen. Berlin: Suhrkamp, S. 187–213.Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew (1984): Method in Social Science. A Realist Approach. Second Edition. London, New York: Routledge 1992.10.4324/9780203310762Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew (2000): Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446218730Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew (2010): „Reflexivity and the habitus“. In: Margaret S. Archer (Hrsg.): Conversations About Reflexivity. Oxon, New York: Routledge, S. 108–122.Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Andrew (2011): Why Things Matter to People. Social Science, Values and Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511734779Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Derek (1979): Marx’s Method. Ideology, Science and Critique in Capital. Sussex: Harvester Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans Bernhard/Schweikard, David P. (Hrsg.) (2009): Kollektive Intentionalität. Eine Debatte über die Grundlagen des Sozialen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Schuck, Hartwig (2012): „Macht und Herrschaft. Eine realistische Analyse“. In: Ingo Elbe/Sven Ellmers/Jan Eufinger (Hrsg.): Anonyme Herrschaft. Zur Struktur moderner Machtverhältnisse. Münster: Dampfboot, S. 35–81.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (1995): The Construction of Social Reality. London: Allen Lane.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (1997): „Replies to critics of The Construction of Social Reality“. In: History of the Human Sciences. 10. Jg., Heft 4, S. 103–110.10.1177/095269519701000408Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. (2010): Making the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Simmel, Georg (1908): Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Stephan, Achim (1999): Emergenz. Von der Unvorhersagbarkeit zur Selbstorganisation. Dresden: Dresden University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stove, David (1991): The Plato Cult and Other Philosophical Follies. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles (1967): „Neutrality in political science“. In: Alan Ryan (Hrsg.): The Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford Illustrated Press 1973, S. 139–170.Search in Google Scholar

Walby, Sylvia (2007): „Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities“. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 37. Jg., Heft 4, S. 449–470.10.1177/0048393107307663Search in Google Scholar

Waldenburger, Lisa (2014): „Situierte Reflexivität. Margaret Archers Entwurf eines kritisch-realistischen Subjektverständnisses“. In: Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie. 1. Jg., Heft 2.10.1515/zksp-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

Wan, Poe Yu-Ze (2011): Refraiming the Social. Emergentist Systemism and Social Theory. Surrey, Burlington: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Wan, Poe Yu-Ze (2013): „Dialectics, complexity and the systemic approach. Toward a critical reconciliation“. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 43. Jg., Heft 4, S. 411–452.10.1177/0048393112441974Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, Frieder Otto (2011): „Nachwort“. In: Louis Althusser: Für Marx. Berlin: Suhrkamp, S. 350–380.Search in Google Scholar