Skip to main content
Log in

Valuing Others’ Information under Imperfect Expectations

A Cross-Individual Perspective on Harmful Information and Stock Market Price Reactions

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sometimes we believe that others receive harmful information. However, Marschak’s value of information framework always assigns non-negative value under expected utility: it starts from the decision maker’s beliefs – and one can never anticipate information’s harmfulness for oneself. The impact of decision makers’ capabilities to process information and of their expectations remains hidden behind the individual and subjective perspective Marschak’s framework assumes. By introducing a second decision maker as a point of reference, this paper introduces a way for evaluating others’ information from a cross-individual, imperfect expectations perspective for agents maximising expected utility. We define the cross-value of information that can become negative – then the information is “harmful” from a cross-individual perspective – and we define (mutual) cost of limited information processing capabilities and imperfect expectations as an opportunity cost from this same point of reference. The simple relationship between these two expected utility-based concepts and Marschak’s framework is shown, and we discuss evaluating short-term reactions of stock market prices to new information as an important domain of valuing others’ information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aumann R.J. (1976), Agreeing to disagree. Annals of Statistics 4, 1236–1239

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlisk J. (1996), Why bounded rationality?. Journal of Economic Literature 34, 669–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Geanakoplos J.D., Polemarchakis H.M. (1982), We can’t disagree forever. Journal of Economic Theory 28, 192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant S., Kajii A., Polak B. (2000), Preference for information and dynamic consistency. Theory and Decision 48, 263–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J., Riley J.G. (1979), The analytics of uncertainty and information. Journal of Economic Literature 17, 1375–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstädt H. (2001), More nonconcavities in information processing functions. Theory and Decision 51, 351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman B.L. (1991), How to decide how to decide how to...: modeling limited rationality. Econometrica 59, 1105–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman B.L. (1995), Information processing and bounded rationality. Canadian Journal of Economics 28, 42–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J.G. (1978), Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics 9, 587–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschak J. (1954), Toward an economic theory of organization and information. In: Thrall R.M., Coombs C.H., Davis R.L. (eds), Decision Processes. Wiley, New York, pp. 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak J. (1959), Efficient and viable organization forms. In: Haire M. (eds), Modern Organization Theory. Wiley, New York, pp. 307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire C.B. (1986), Comparison of information structures. In: McGuire C.B., Radner R. (eds), Decision and Organizations. 2nd ed. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 101–130

  • Mongin P., Walliser B. (1988), Infinite regressions in the optimizing theory of decisions. In: Munier B. (eds), Risk, Decisions, and Rationality. D Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 435–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker P. (1988), Nonexpected utility as aversion to information. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1, 169–175

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hagen Lindstädt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindstädt, H. Valuing Others’ Information under Imperfect Expectations. Theor Decis 62, 335–353 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9039-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9039-1

Keywords

JEL-Classification

Navigation