Skip to main content
Log in

What Does “Society” Look Like?

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bargh JA, Ferguson MJ (2000) Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin 126: 925–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijker WE (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MB, Gardner W (1996) Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner J (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne RW, Whiten A (1988) Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1960) Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67: 380–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1994) How individual and face-to-face group selection undermine firm selection in organizational evolution. In: Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (Baum JAC, Singh JV, eds), 23–38. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT (1997) From evolutionary epistemology via selection theory to a sociology of scientific validity. Evolution and Cognition 3: 5–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael LR (2001) Parts and wholes: The evolutionary importance of groups. In: Individual Self, Relational Self, and Collective Self (Sedikides C, Brewer MB, eds), 214–258. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael LR (2003) Repeated assembly. In: Alternative Approaches to Evolutionary Psychology (Schur S, Rauscher F, eds), 71–90. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael LR (2007) Evolutionary theory for social and cultural psychology. In: Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds), 3–18. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael LR (2008) Groups and the evolution of good stories and good choices. In: Rationality and Social Responsibility: Essays in Honor of Robyn Mason Dawes (Krueger JI, ed), 275–319. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporael LR, Dawes RM, Orbell JM, van de Kragt AJC (1989) Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 683–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancey WJ (1997) Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyd J (1983) Shareability: The social psychology of epistemology. Cognitive Science 7: 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin CD, Higgins ET (1996) Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In: Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, Vol. 3: The Interpersonal Context (Sorrentino RM, Higgins ET, eds), 28–84. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks-Jansen H (1996) Catching Ourselves in the Act. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull DL (1988) Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1996) Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Brown GR (2002) Sense and Nonsense. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1987 [Orig. 1984]) Science and myth. In: The Natural History Reader in Evolution (Eldredge N, ed), 222–229. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (2003) Self and social functions: Individual autobiographical memory and collective narrative. Memory 11: 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett R, Ross L (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Johnstone M (1990) The Roots of Thinking. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore B (1996) Culture in Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E, Wilson DS (1998) Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K, Griffiths PE (1999) Sex and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS (1975) A theory of group selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 72: 143–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC (2001) Generative entrenchment and the developmental systems approach to evolutionary processes. In: Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems and Evolution (Oyama S, Gray R, Griffiths P, eds), 219–237. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt WC, Griesemer JR (2007) Reproducing entrenchments to scaffold culture: The central role of development in cultural evolution. In: Integrating Evolution and Development: From Theory to Practice (Sansom R, Brandon RN, eds), 227–323. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linnda R. Caporael.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caporael, L.R. What Does “Society” Look Like?. Biol Theory 3, 103–107 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.2.103

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.2.103

Keywords

Navigation