Skip to main content
Log in

A Framework for Multi-Agent Belief Revision

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Benferhat, S., D. Dubois, and H. Prade, ‘From semantic to syntactic approaches to informtion combination in possibilistic logic’ In B. Bouchon-Meunier, editor, Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pages 141–161, Physica Verlag, 1997.

  2. Cantwell, J., ‘Resolving conicting information’, Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 7:191–220, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C., F. De Rosis, R. Falcone, and S. Pizzutilo, ‘Personality traits and social attitudes in multiagent cooperation’, Applied Artificial Intelligence 12:649–675, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis, R., and R. G. Smith, ‘Negotiation as a metaphor for distributed problem solving’, Artificial Intelligence 20:63–109, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dragoni, A. F., ‘Belief revision under uncertainty in a multi-agent environment’, in S. Tzafestas, editor, Knowledge-Based Systems: Advanced Concepts, Techniques and Applications, pages 191–215, World Scientific, 1997.

  6. Dragoni, A. F., and P. Guorgini, ‘Revising beliefs received form multiple sources’, in M.-A. Williams and H. Rott, editors, Frontiers of Belief Revision, 1999.

  7. Dragoni, A. F., P. Guorgini, and M. Baffetti, ‘Distributed belief revision vs. belief revision in a multi-agent environment: First result of a simulation experiment’, in Multi-Agent Rationality, Proc. of MAAMAW'97, LNAI, pages 45–62, Ronneby, Sweden, Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dragoni, A. F., P. Guorgini, and P. Puliti, ‘Distributed belief revision versus distributed truth maintenance’, in Proc. of 6th IEEE conf. on Tools with A.I. IEEE computer Press, 1994.

  9. Dragoni, A. F., and P. F. Guorgini, ‘Belief revision through the belief function formalism in a multi-agent environment’, in Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, Springer-Verlag, 1997.

  10. Dubois, D., and H. Prade, ‘Belief change and possibility theory’, in P. Gärdenfors, editor, Belief Revision, pages 142–182, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ephrati, E., and J. S. Rosenschein, ‘Deriving consensus in multiagent systems’, Artificial Intelligence 87:21–74, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fagin, F., J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Y. Vardi, Reasoning about Knowledge, The MIT Press, London, 1 edition, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gabbay, D. M., C. J. Hogger, and J. A. Robinson, editors, Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, volume 1, Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Gärdenfors, Knowledge in Flux — Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States, The MIT Press, London, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huhns, M. N., and D. M. Bridgeland, ‘Distributed truth maintenance’, in S. M. Dean, editor, Cooperating Knowledge Based Systems, pages 133–147, Springer-Verlag, 1990.

  16. Kfir-dahav, N.E., and M. Tennenholtz, ‘Muti-agent belief revision’, in 6th Conf. on Theoretical Aspects to Rationality and Knowledge, pages 175–194, 1996.

  17. Liberatore, P., and M. Schaerf, ‘Arbitration (or how to merge knoweledge bases)’, IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10(1):76–90, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, W., and M. A. Williams, ‘A framework for multi-agent belief revision (part i: The role of ontology)’, in N. Foo, editor, 12th Australian Joint Conference on Artifificial Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, Springer-Verlag, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lomuscio, A., and M. Ryan, ‘Ideal agents sharing (some!) knowledge’, in H. Parade, editor, 13th European Conf. on AI, ECAI'98, pages 557–561, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1998.

  20. Malheiro, B., N. R. Jennings, and E. Oliveira, ‘Belief revision in multi-agent systems’, in A. G. Cohn, editor, 11th European Conferece on Artificial Intelligence, pages 294–298, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, John Wiley & sons, Ltd, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. van der Meyden, R., ‘Mutual belief revision’, in the Fourth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'94), 1994.

  22. Papaxoglou, M.P., and G. Schlageter, editors, Cooperative Information Systems, Academic Press Limited, San Diego, California, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Saten, http://u2.newcastle.edu.au/webworld/saten/ (hint: use netscape 4.5 or above with java 1.1.1 plugin).

  24. Singh, M.P., Muti-Agent Systems — A Theoretical Framework for Intentions, Know-How, and Communications, LNAI. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tidhar, G., E. A. Sonenberg, and A. S. Rao, ‘On team knowledge and common knowledge’, in Y. Demazeau, editor, Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 301–308, Paris, France, IEEE Computer Society, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Williams, M.A., ‘Transmutation of knowledge systems’, in J. Doyle, E. Sandewall, and P. Torasso, editors, 4th International Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 619–629, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1994.

  27. Williams, M. A., ‘Anytime belief revision’, in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 74–80, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1997.

  28. Williams, M.A., ‘Applications of belief revision’, in B. Freitag, editor, Transactions and Change in Logic Databases, volume LNCS 1472, pages 15–47, Springer-Verlag, 1998.

  29. Wooldridge, M., ‘Intelligent agents’, in G. Weiss, editor, Multiagent Systems, The MIT Press, 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, W., Williams, MA. A Framework for Multi-Agent Belief Revision. Studia Logica 67, 291–312 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010555305483

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010555305483

Navigation