Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Institutional Isomorphism and Food Fraud: A Longitudinal Study of the Mislabeling of Rice in Taiwan

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of high-profile mislabeling incidents have led to many studies exploring the decision-making processes that firms make around performing illegal acts. However, it remains unclear why the proportion of firms conducting these acts constantly fluctuates and never disappears. Therefore, this study investigated this by carrying out a longitudinal analysis of food labeling in the Taiwanese rice industry. Drawing on the institutional isomorphism theory, it was found that the degree of mislabeling is negatively correlated with both the level of control of inspection regulations and public attention toward food regulations, and positively correlated with the previous proportion of firms mislabeling their products. Thus, there is a feedback loop between regulatory control, public attention, and the amount of mislabeling, with the amount of mislabeling not only being affected by the former degree of regulatory control, public attention, and mislabeling, but also modifying the future status of each of these. These findings further our understanding of the causal effects of illegal actions in the institutional agricultural environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abreu, M. C. S., Cunha, L. T., & Barlow, C. Y. (2015). Institutional dynamics and organizations affecting the adoption of sustainable development in the United Kingdom and Brazil. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AFA (Agriculture and Food Agency). (2014). Introduction of production and marketing team. http://www.afa.gov.tw/content_en.aspx?pcatid=1&ycatid=1&lcatid=500.

  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, H. B. (1983). Causal modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1993). The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 837–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Segev, E. (2011). Exploring new web-based tools to identify public interest in science. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R., Herdt, R. W., & Rose, B. (1985). The rice economy of Asia. Washington, DC: The International Rice Research Institute/Manila.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, I., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2006). To conform or to perform? mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1559–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baucus, M. S. (1987). Antecedents and consequences of illegal corporate behavior. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, IN, USA.

  • Baucus, M. S., & Near, J. P. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicted? an event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2015). Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z.

  • Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, J. A., & Mojduszka, E. M. (1996). Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78(5), 1248–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Control Yuan Republic of China (2014). Investigation report for SUNSUIVI company. NO:1020800341. http://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdUrl=./di/edoc/eDocForm_Read.asp&ctNode=910&AP_Code=eDoc&Func_Code=t01&case_id=103000002.

  • Cooper, D. R., & Emory, C. W. (1995). Business research methods. Chicago, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P., & Wicks, P. (2011). Institutional interest in corporate responsibility: Portfolio evidence and ethical explanation. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Y., Kong, D., & Wang, M. (2013). Investor reactions to food safety incidents: Evidence from the Chinese milk industry. Food Policy, 43, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, C. C., & Huang, J. (1996). Political eocnomy of rice price protection in Asia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44(3), 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 312–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35(1), 91–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Walter, W. P. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P., Howton, S. D., Howton, S. W., & Siegel, D. S. (2010). Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? the role of institutions, information, and legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1461–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopfer, K. (1991). Toward a theory of economic institutions: Synergy and path dependency. Journal of Economic Issues, 25(2), 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FDA. (2006). FDA counterfeit drug task force report: 2006 update. Rockville, MD 20857, USA: Food and Drug Administration.

  • FDA. (2010). FDA conducts preliminary review of agency’s diversion and counterfeit criminal case information. (Keynote address by Dr. Margaret Hamburg at Counterfeit drug interchange conference.) Washington, DC: Hosted by the Partnership for Safe Medicines.

  • Fligstein, N. (1993). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakas, K., & Fulton, M. (2002). Consumption effects of genetic modification: what if consumers are right? Agricultural Economics, 27(2), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golan, E., Kuchler, F., Mitchell, L., Greene, C., & Jessup, A. (2001). Economics of food labeling. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(2), 117–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, K., & Shelton, T. (2007). Family empowerment as a mediator between family-centered systems of care and changes in child functioning: identifying an important mechanism of change. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16(4), 556–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitaiton: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, D. A., Roosen, J., & Jensen, H. H. (2003). Systemic failure in the provision of safe food. Food Policy, 28(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, J. E. (2004). Information asymmetry and the role of traceability systems. Agribusiness, 20(4), 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. (1997). From Heresy to Dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. San Francisco, CA: The New Lexington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Grocery Distribution. (2000). GM foods-past, present, future. Hertfordshire, UK: IGD Business Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, H. S, Jr. (2003). On finding solutions to ethical problems in agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16(5), 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhou, M. S., & Hu, J. Y. (2013). Rice industry structure and trends at home and abroad. Food Security and Biotechnology, 36, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2014). Food fraud and “Economically Motivated Adulteration” of food and food ingredients. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, D. (2012). Does corporate social responsibility matter in the food industry? Evidence from a nature experiment in China. Food Policy, 37(3), 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, C. E., & Luoto, J. (1982). “The health consequences of smoking: Cancer,” overview of a report of the surgeon general. Public Health Reports, 97(4), 318–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lan, T. M., & Chi, W. (2014). Manager! An angel or a devil?. Taipei: Sin-Shih Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S. F. (2013). Disclosure mixed rice insider profiteering. Common Wealth Magazine, 532, http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5052545.

  • Madhavan, R., & Prescott, J. E. (1995). Market value impact of joint ventures: The effect of industry information processing load. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 900–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magat, W., & Viscusi, W. K. (1992). Informational approaches to regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadeo, J. D., Oogarah-Hanuman, V., & Soobaroyen, T. (2011). Changes in social and environmental reporting practices in an emerging economy (2004–2007): Exploring the relevance of stakeholder and legitimacy theories. Accounting Forum, 35(3), 158–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, L., & Soon, J. M. (2014). Developing systems to control food adulteration. Food Policy, 49(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcellino, M., & Musso, A. (2011). The reliability of real-time estimates of the euro area output gap. Economic Modelling, 28(4), 1842–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehic, E. (2014). 7th international conference of the school of economics and business. Policy, 11(3), 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellon, J. (2013). Where and when can we use Google trends to measure issue salience? PS: Political Science and Politics, 46(2), 280–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. H., & Cameron, K. S. (1982). Coffin nails and corporate strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A. S., Terry, L. A., & Timothy, S. (1990). Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 689–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. C., Spink, J., & Lipp, M. (2012). Development and application of a database of food ingredient fraud and economically motivated adulteration from 1980 to 2010. Journal of Food Science, 77(4), 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1985). Applied linear statistical models (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2008). The economic impact of counterfeiting and piracy. Part II: Combating counterfeiting and piracy.

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman, S., Darus, F., & Arshad, R. (2011). The influence of coercive isomorphism on corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, S. (2010). Food fraud—a current issue but an old problem. British Food Journal, 112(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi, A. (2001). Changing structure of global food consumption and trade. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Trade Report. WRS-01-1.

  • Rhee, M., Kim, Y.-C., & Han, J. (2006). Confidence in imitation: Niche-Width strategy in the UK automobile industry. Management Science, 52(4), 501–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, B., & Sheldon, I. (2007). Credence good labeling: The efficiency and distributional implications of several policy approaches. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(4), 1020–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. W. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(5), 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuangjie, S., Hui, C., & Kun, Y. (2011). Investor attention and IPO anomalies: Evidence from Google trend volume. Economic Research Journal, S1, 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. S. (1986). The decomposition of antitrust: Testing a multi-level, longitudinal model of profit-squeeze. American Sociological Review, 51(6), 859–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spink, J., & Moyer, D. C. (2011). Defining the public health threat of food fraud. Journal of Food Science, 76(9), 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TPA (Supreme Adminstrative Court). (2014). Referee book, Conference Zi No. 177 103 Annual. http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/index_1.htm.

  • TPB (Taipei High Administrative Court). (2014). Referee book, No. 2 103 annual bully. http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/FJUD/FJUDQRY03_1.aspx?id=1&v_court=TPB + %E8%87%BA%E5%8C%97%E9%AB%98%E7%AD%89%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E6%B3%95%E9%99%A2&v_sys=A&jud_year=&jud_case=&jud_no=&jud_no_end=&jud_title=&keyword=%E8%81%AF%E7%B1%B3&sdate=&edate=&page=&searchkw=%E8%81%AF%E7%B1%B3&jmain=&cw=0.

  • Van Wezemael, L., Verbeke, W., Kügler, J. O., de Barcellos, M. D., & Grunert, K. G. (2010). European consumers and beef safety: Perceptions, expectations and uncertainty reduction strategies. Food Control, 21(6), 835–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venard, B. (2009). Organizational isomorphism and corruption: An empirical research in Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venard, B., & Hanafi, M. (2008). Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 481–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W. (2005). Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(3), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCO (World Customs Organization). (2007). Counterfeiting and piracy: Crime of the 21st century?. Brussels: World Customs Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization). (2007). General information on counterfeit medicines. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimanda, R. E., Turner, P. M., & Hall, M. J. B. (2011). Expectations and the inertia of inflation: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(3), 426–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, M., & Hoffman, A. (2008). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook for organizational institutionalism (pp. 130–147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W., Johan, S., & Rui, O. (2014). Institutional investors, political connections, and the incidence of regulatory enforcement against corporate fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–18. dio: 10.1007/s10551-014-2392-4.

  • Yang, M. H., Lu, Y. H., & Tai, M. Y. (2013). Profit efficiency analysis of grain merchants involved in the specialized rice production and marketing areas. Taiwanese Agricultural Economic Review, 18(2), 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabid, A., & Alsagoff, S. (1993). Perceived ethical values of Malaysian managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(4), 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13(2), 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chia-Yi Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, CY. Institutional Isomorphism and Food Fraud: A Longitudinal Study of the Mislabeling of Rice in Taiwan. J Agric Environ Ethics 29, 607–630 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9623-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9623-x

Keywords

Navigation