Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Straightforward Reading, Injective Interpretation, and Scientific Implication: On the Mencian Theory of Human Nature

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experimental essay intends to analyze interpretational cases related to the understanding of the Mencian theory of human nature. The first part introduces straightforward reading by a representative sinologist, historian, and philosopher. The second part discusses two examples that reinterpret the Mencian theory in an injective way with the Kantian theory and processing philosophy, respectively. The third part reexamines our understanding and evaluation of human nature in the Mencian theory using new discoveries of experimental psychology. The claim that there exists a foundation of goodness in human nature has been revealed by both Mencius and modern psychologists from their own perspectives. It should be meaningful to further examine the rationale of acceptance of these theories. Such study also contributes to establishing a right attitude towards people and human societies, which in turn will influence the quality of our life in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger T. 1991. “The Mencian Conception of Ren xing 人性: Does It Mean ‘Human Nature’?” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, edited by Henry Rosemont, Jr. La Salle: Open Court.

  • ______. 2002. “Mencius and a Process Notion of Human Nature.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations, edited by Alan K. L. Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press.

  • ______. 2003. “Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: A Dialogue.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30.3–4: 403–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behuniak, James Jr. 2005. Mencius on Becoming Human, Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2011. “Naturalizing Mencius.” Philosophy East and West 61.3: 492–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Irene T. 2002. “Mengzian Arguments on Human Nature.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mencius, edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianaplolis: Hacket Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Paul. 2013. Just Babies: Origins of Good and Evil. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. Trans. by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Sheed & Ward.

  • Graham, A. C. 1990. Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C. 1970. Mencius. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Minghui 李明輝. 1994. Kant’s Ethics and the Reconstruction of Mencian Moral Thinking 康德倫理學與孟子道德思考之重建. Taipei 台北: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan, Zhongguo Wenzhe Yanjiusuo 中央研究院中國文哲研究所.

  • ______. 2001. Reinvestigation into Mencius孟子重探. Taipei 台北: Lianjing 聯經.

  • Liu, Xiaogan 劉笑敢. 2009. Hermeneutics and Orientation: Research Methodology and Orientation in Chinese Philosophical Research 詮釋與定向: 中國哲學研究方法之探究. Beijing 北京: Shangwu Yinshuguan 商務印書館 .

  • Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. 1996. On Perfective Goodness 圓善論. Taipei 台北: Xuesheng Shuju 學生書局.

  • Munro, Donald J. 1969. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1977. The Concept of Man in Contemporary China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2002. “Mencius and an Ethics of the New Century.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations, edited by Alan K. L. Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2005a. “A Modern Way of Justifying Ethical Rules: J. S. Mill, Mencius, and Current Biology.” In A Chinese Ethics for the New Century. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • ______. 2005b. “The Biological Basis of Confucian Ethics: Or, a Reason Why Confucianism Has Endured for So Long.” In A Chinese Ethics for the New Century. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • Su, Yu 蘇輿. 1992. Certification of the Rich Dew of the Spring and Autumn Annals 春秋繁露義證. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

  • Yang, Zebo 楊澤波. 2014. Contribution and Completion: A Research of MouZongsan’s Confucian Theories 貢獻與終結——牟宗三儒學思想研究. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Remin Chubanshe 上海人民出版社.

  • Zhang, Dainian 張岱年. 1982. An Outline of Chinese Philosophy 中國哲學大綱. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe 中國社會科學出版社.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Philosophy, Beijing Normal University, 19 Xinjiekouwai Street, Haidian, Beijing, China

    Xiaogan Liu

Authors
  1. Xiaogan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaogan Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X. Straightforward Reading, Injective Interpretation, and Scientific Implication: On the Mencian Theory of Human Nature. Dao 19, 175–192 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09717-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09717-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation