Abstract
This experimental essay intends to analyze interpretational cases related to the understanding of the Mencian theory of human nature. The first part introduces straightforward reading by a representative sinologist, historian, and philosopher. The second part discusses two examples that reinterpret the Mencian theory in an injective way with the Kantian theory and processing philosophy, respectively. The third part reexamines our understanding and evaluation of human nature in the Mencian theory using new discoveries of experimental psychology. The claim that there exists a foundation of goodness in human nature has been revealed by both Mencius and modern psychologists from their own perspectives. It should be meaningful to further examine the rationale of acceptance of these theories. Such study also contributes to establishing a right attitude towards people and human societies, which in turn will influence the quality of our life in the long term.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, Roger T. 1991. “The Mencian Conception of Ren xing 人性: Does It Mean ‘Human Nature’?” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, edited by Henry Rosemont, Jr. La Salle: Open Court.
______. 2002. “Mencius and a Process Notion of Human Nature.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations, edited by Alan K. L. Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawai`i Press.
______. 2003. “Confucianism and Deweyan Pragmatism: A Dialogue.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30.3–4: 403–417.
Behuniak, James Jr. 2005. Mencius on Becoming Human, Albany: SUNY Press.
______. 2011. “Naturalizing Mencius.” Philosophy East and West 61.3: 492–515.
Bloom, Irene T. 2002. “Mengzian Arguments on Human Nature.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mencius, edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianaplolis: Hacket Publishing Company.
Bloom, Paul. 2013. Just Babies: Origins of Good and Evil. New York: Crown Publishers.
Chan, Wing-tsit. 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. Trans. by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Sheed & Ward.
Graham, A. C. 1990. Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Albany: SUNY Press.
Lau, D. C. 1970. Mencius. London: Penguin Books.
Li, Minghui 李明輝. 1994. Kant’s Ethics and the Reconstruction of Mencian Moral Thinking 康德倫理學與孟子道德思考之重建. Taipei 台北: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan, Zhongguo Wenzhe Yanjiusuo 中央研究院中國文哲研究所.
______. 2001. Reinvestigation into Mencius孟子重探. Taipei 台北: Lianjing 聯經.
Liu, Xiaogan 劉笑敢. 2009. Hermeneutics and Orientation: Research Methodology and Orientation in Chinese Philosophical Research 詮釋與定向: 中國哲學研究方法之探究. Beijing 北京: Shangwu Yinshuguan 商務印書館 .
Mou, Zongsan 牟宗三. 1996. On Perfective Goodness 圓善論. Taipei 台北: Xuesheng Shuju 學生書局.
Munro, Donald J. 1969. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
______. 1977. The Concept of Man in Contemporary China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
______. 2002. “Mencius and an Ethics of the New Century.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations, edited by Alan K. L. Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
______. 2005a. “A Modern Way of Justifying Ethical Rules: J. S. Mill, Mencius, and Current Biology.” In A Chinese Ethics for the New Century. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
______. 2005b. “The Biological Basis of Confucian Ethics: Or, a Reason Why Confucianism Has Endured for So Long.” In A Chinese Ethics for the New Century. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Su, Yu 蘇輿. 1992. Certification of the Rich Dew of the Spring and Autumn Annals 春秋繁露義證. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.
Yang, Zebo 楊澤波. 2014. Contribution and Completion: A Research of MouZongsan’s Confucian Theories 貢獻與終結——牟宗三儒學思想研究. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Remin Chubanshe 上海人民出版社.
Zhang, Dainian 張岱年. 1982. An Outline of Chinese Philosophy 中國哲學大綱. Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe 中國社會科學出版社.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X. Straightforward Reading, Injective Interpretation, and Scientific Implication: On the Mencian Theory of Human Nature. Dao 19, 175–192 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09717-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-020-09717-0