Abstract
The question is discussed how noise gained a functional meaning in the context of biology. According to the common view, noise is considered a disturbance or perturbation. I analyze how this understanding changed and what kind of developments during the last 10 years contributed to the emergence of a new understanding of noise. Results gained during a field study in a synthetic biology laboratory show that the emergence of this new research discipline—its highly interdisciplinary character, its new technologies and novel modeling strategies—provided essential impulses, which led to the observed change in the concept of noise. The laboratory study is combined with a historical analysis, which explores the general question as to how concepts travel between disciplines and, specifically, how noise was transferred from engineering and physics into biology. In the past, scientists, such as Lotka and Goodwin, tried to introduce a statistical mechanics into biology and discussed the problem of “unfitting” concepts. The change in the meaning of the concept can be interpreted as a way of making it fit to the novel context in which it is applied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alon U, Suette M, Barkai N, Leibler S (1999) Robustness in bacterial Chemotaxis. Nature 397: 168–171.
Bartholomay FA (1958) Stochastic models for chemical reactions: 1. Theory of the unimolecular reaction process. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 20: 175–190.
Bechtel W, Richardson RC (1993) Discovering Complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Delbrück M (1940) Statistical fluctuations in autocatalytic reactions. Journal of Chemical Physics 8: 120–124.
Elowitz MB, Leibler S (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional translation. Nature 403: 335–338.
Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297: 1183–1186.
Endy D (2005) Foundations for engineering biology. Nature 438: 449–453.
Fujimura J (2005) Postgenomics futures: Translations across the machine-nature border in systems biology. New Genetics and Society 24: 195–225.
Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry 81: 2340–2361.
Goodwin BC (1963) Temporal Organization in Cells. London: Academic Press.
Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW (1999) From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature 402 (6761 Suppl.): C47–C52.
Hesse M (1963) Models and Analogies in Science. London: Sheed and Ward.
Konopka R, Benzer S (1971) Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 68: 2112–2116.
Lindler B, Gracia-Ojalvo J, Neiman A, Schimansky-Geier L (2004) Effects of noise in excitable systems. Physics Reports, 392: 321–424.
Loettgers A (2007) Model organisms, mathematical models, and synthetic models in exploring gene regulating mechanism. Biological Theory 2: 142–143.
Lotka A (1925) Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
McQuarrie DA, Jachimowski CJ, Russel ME (1964) Kinetics of small systems II. Journal of Chemical Physics 40: 2914–2921.
Mitchell S (2003) Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nersessian NJ, Chandrasekharan S (2009) Hybrid analogies in conceptual innovation in science. Cognitive Systems Research Journal 10: 178–188.
Nersessian NJ, Patton C (2009) Model-based reasoning in interdisciplinary engineering. In: The Handbook of the Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (Meijers AWM, ed), 678–718. New York: Springer.
Paulsson J, Berg HO, Ehrenberg M (2000) Stochastic focusing: Fluctuation-enhanced sensitivity of intracellular regulation. PNAS 9713: 7148–7153.
Pittendrigh CS (1961) On temporal organization in living systems. The Harvey Lectures 59: 63–125.
Pittendrigh CS, Bruce VC (1957) An oscillator model for biological clocks. In: Ryhthmic and Synthetic Processes in Growth (Rudnick D, ed), 55–109. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Spudish LJ, Koshland DE Jr (1976) Non-genetic individuality: Chance in the single cell. Nature 262: 467–471.
Suel G, Gracia-Ojalvo J, Liberman L, Elowitz MB (2006) An excitable gene regulatory circuit induces transient cellular differentiation. Nature 440: 759–766.
Szybalski W, Skala A (1978) Nobel prizes and restriction enzymes. Gene 4: 181–182.
Thattai M, van Oudenaarden A (2001) Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 8614–8619.
Thattai M, van Oudenaarden A (2004) Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics 167: 523–530.
Vilar JMG, Kueh HY, Barkai N, Leibler S (2002) Mechanisms of noise-resistance in genetic oscillators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 99: 5988–5992.
Wimsatt WC (2007) Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winfree A (1967) Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators. Journal of Theoretical Biology 16: 15–42.
Winfree A (1980) The Geometry of Biological Time. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loettgers, A. Synthetic Biology and the Emergence of a Dual Meaning of Noise. Biol Theory 4, 340–356 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00009
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00009