Abstract
A new experimental procedure is introduced for studying word recognition. On each trial in the word reading task, subjects are presented a target word, and their response latency, indicating when they have read the word, is recorded. Two experiments demonstrated the sensitivity of the procedure. In Experiment 1, subjects responded faster to frequent words than to infrequent words, and the frequency effect was greater for long words than for short words. In Experiment 2, responses were faster to a target word if it was preceded by a related, rather than an unrelated, word. Furthermore, reaction times were slower if the target was degraded rather than intact. The word reading task is a potentially less complicated experimental procedure than the lexical decision and naming tasks because it eliminates the binary decision and verbal production demands of those tasks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 56–70.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a goodmeasure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 340–357.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production frequency? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89–106.
Balota, D. A., & Lorch, R. F., Jr. (in press). The depth of spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.
Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 252–259.
Becker, C. A., & Killion, T. H. (1977). Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 3, 389–401.
Chumbley, J. I., & Balota, D. A. (1984). A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 12, 590–606.
Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–635.
Haberlandt, K. F., & Graesser, A. C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 357–374.
Hudson, P. T. W., & Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 46–58.
Jenkins, J. J. (1970). The 1952 Minnesota word association norms. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.), Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.
Keppel, G., & Strand, B. Z. (1970). Free-association responses to the primary responses and other responses selected from the Palermo-Jenkins norms. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.), Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
Kinoshita, S., Taft, M., & Taplin, J. E. (1985). Nonword facilitation in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 346–362.
Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
Lupker, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 709–733.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on visual word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Domic (Eds.), Attention and performance V. London: Academic Press.
Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 86, 165–178.
Postman, L. (1970). The California norms: Association as a function of word frequency. In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.), Norms of word association. New York: Academic Press.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., & Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 12, 315–328.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1983). On priming by a sentence context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 1–36.
West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 8, 385–399.
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-non word classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 143–154.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I would like to express my appreciation to the following people for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript: Susan M. Belmore, Robert Crowder, Kenneth Forster, and Henry L. Roediger III.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorch, R.F. Use of a word reading task for studying word recognition. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 24, 11–14 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330489
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330489