Skip to main content
Log in

A Levinasian Approach to Whistleblowing

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article draws on the work of the philosopher Emmanuel Levinas to offer a fresh insight into the law’s response to the issue of whistleblowing. In order to achieve this we briefly outline the main themes of his philosophy of otherness which insists that the very essence of ethics springs from the subjection (a succumbing) of the Subject to the ethical call of the Other. We provide a short description of the UK law on whistleblowing before undertaking a Levinasian reading of a particular case in order to consider the dilemma that confronts the judge in framing an ethical response to the whistleblower as Other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aasland, D. C. 2004, ‘On the Ethics Behind Business Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 53, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman Z. 1993, Postmodern Ethics, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge Massachusetts, Basil

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (ed) 2008, Whistle blowing In The Australian Public Sector (Canberra, Australian National University)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, D. 1992, The Philosophy of the Limit, Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. 1992, The Ethics of Deconstruction, Derrida and Levinas (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford and Cambridge, Massachusetts)

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. 2006, ‘Anarchic Law: A review of Proximity, Levinas and the Soul of Law by Desmond Manderson’ Law & Humanities, 248

  • Critchley, S. 2007, Infinitely Demanding, Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance (Verso, London & New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J. ‘The force of law: “the mystical foundation of authority”’, Cardozo Law Review, 11, pp. 916–1046

  • Douzinas C., Warrington R.: 1994, Justice miscarried: Ethics and Aesthetics in Law (Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Douzinas C., Gearey A.: 2005, Critical Jurisprudence The Political Philosophy of Justice (Hart Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R.: 2006, Verdict and Sentence: Cover and Levinas on the Robe of Justice, The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, Volume 14, Issue 1, 73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B.: 2003, Justice in the Risk Society (Sage Publications)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn-Freund, O.: 1972, Labour and the Law, (Hamlyn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., O’Learey, M.: 2006, ‘Leadership, Ethics and Responsibility to the Other’, Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E.: 2007, Totality and Infinity (first published in French under the title Totalité et Infini, 1961) (A. Lingis tr, 20th edn, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E.: 2002, Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism (first published under the title Difficile liberté, 1963) (S. Hand tr, 13th edn, John Hopkins University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E.: 2006, Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence (first published in French under the title Autrement qu etre, 1974) (A. Lingis tr, 6th edn, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E.: 1995, Ethics and Infinity (first published in French under the title Ethique et infini, 1982 (A. Cohen tr, 6th edn, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) Levinas, E.:2001, Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas, J. Robbins (ed) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D., Kender, M.:2010, A survey of whistleblowing/confidential reporting procedures used by the FTSE top 250 firms (Middlesex University and SAI Global)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loumansky, A.: 2000, ‘Me voici, here I am, here I stand, I can do no other’, Law Critique 11, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manderson, D.: 2006, Proximity, Levinas and the Soul of Law (McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal & Kingston, London and Ithaca)

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnow M.:1990, Dying and Living — In a case like ours: The Story of Phillip Becker, Contribution to Making All the Difference, Cornell University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., Near, J., Dworkin T.: 2008, Whistle-blowing In Organizations (New York, Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.P.: 1975, Whigs & Hunters (Penguin Books)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Loumansky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loumansky, A., Lewis, D. A Levinasian Approach to Whistleblowing. Philos. of Manag. 12, 27–48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom201312317

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom201312317

Keywords

Navigation