Abstract
This paper draws upon a recently completed research study of the responses of accountants and HR professionals to actual issues at work that had posed them ethical qualms. The study sought to get beyond ethical reasoning about hypothetical scenarios and to address issues of actual behaviour, focusing upon the interviewees explanations of these behaviours. In general terms there was an observable difference between the attitudes and behaviours of accountants and HR professions, but not in the simple, stereotypical sense. The concerns expressed by the interviewees when calculating their chosen courses of action in a given situation, reflected grave concerns for their current and future employment prospects, if they were to raise their concerns, either within their employing organisation, or beyond. The problems of whistleblowers are well documented, but at a time when corporate governance issues occupy the attention of financial markets and corporate boards around the world, and national governments are introducing new laws to ostensibly provide enhanced protection for whistleblowers, the evidence of this study is that moral agency remains at best an aspiration, and at worst a chimera.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauman Z.: 1994, Alone Again: Ethics after Certainty (Demos, London).
Bird, F. B. and J. A. Waters: 1989, ‘The Moral Muteness of Managers’, California Management Review (Fall), 73–88.
Fineman S.: 1998, ‘The Natural Environment, Organisation and Ethics’, in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics & Organisations (Sage, London).
Fisher, C. and A. T. A. Lovell: 2000, Accountants and Their Responses to Ethical Issues at Work (CIMA).
Gorz A.: 1989, Critique of Economic Reason, trans. G. Handyside and C. Turner (Verso, London).
Humphrey, C., P. Miller and R. Scapens: 1993, ‘Accountability and Accountable Management in the U.K. Public Sector’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 6(3), 7–29.
Jackall, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, New York).
Kärreman, D. and M. Alvesson: 1999, ‘Ethical Closure in Organisational Settings-The Case of Media Organisations’, paper presented at the EGOS 15th. Colloquium, Organisations in a Challenging World: Theories, Practices and Societies, The University of Warwick, July 4th-6th.
Kutnick, P.: (1984), ‘The Relationship of Moral Action: Kohlberg's Theory, Criticisms and Reviews’, in S. Modgil and C. Modgil (eds.), Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy (The Falmer Press, London).
Laughlin R. C.: 1996, ‘Principles and Higher Principals: Accounting for Accountability in the Caring Professions’, in R. Munro and J. Mouritsen (eds.), Accountability: Power, Ethos the Technologies of Managing (International Thompson Business Press).
Lovell, A. T. A.: (forthcoming), Internal Charging Systems in the Public Sector: Accounting for Illusions (ACCA).
Legge, K: (1998), ‘Is HRM Ethical? Can HRM be Ethical’, in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics & Organisations (Sage, London).
Lindblom, C. E.: 1977, Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems (Basic Books, New York).
Titmuss, R.: 1970, The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy (Allen & Unwin, London).
Watson, T.: 1998, ‘Ethical Codes and Moral Communities: The Gunlaw Temptation, the Simon Solution and the David Dilemma’, in M. Parker (ed.), Ethics & Organisations (Sage), pp. 253–269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lovell, A. Ethics as a Dependent Variable in Individual and Organisational Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 37, 145–163 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015016524880
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015016524880